This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

New laws will make it easier for digital-first providers to set up new practices

NHS England has announced plans to make it easier for digital-first providers - such as Babylon GP at Hand - to set up practices in deprived areas from April 2020.

Under the plans, which form part of a consultation on out-of-area patient registration - providers could be able to set up new practices in deprived and under-doctored areas through an APMS contract if they can demonstrate a 'credible plan' for bringing new GPs to the area, and offer face-to-face appointments in underserved areas.

NHS England stressed the current GP shortage, saying that digital-first providers have the potential to address issues in access to services and mitigate the effects of the inverse care law.

As part of the same consultation, which runs for two months, NHS England has proposed that Babylon, which has a huge number of patients based in different CCGs, should be forced to open a new practice under an APMS contract in CCGs where they have a large presence. These practices will then have the right to join an existing primary care network.

Under the long-term plan, released earlier this year, NHS England committed to offer every patient in England access to digital-first primary care over the next five years.

Documents published today said that this will be achieved 'by supporting existing general practice to expand and develop its digital-first offer, as some practices are already doing by partnering with suppliers of digital technology to deliver a digital offer to their patients'.

The documents state: 'A new programme will be introduced in 2019/20 to support ICSs, STPs, CCGs, PCNs and practices to develop an integrated digital-first offer that supports both patients and staff. The programme will ensure a new framework is available for digital suppliers to offer their platforms on standard NHS terms.

'But we recognise that change takes time and this approach alone is unlikely to maximise take-up and innovation in digital-first services at pace, ensuring delivery of the NHS long-term plan commitment. We also need to continue to improve access to general practice services in some geographies, and digital-first providers could help achieve this.

The documents added: 'In this chapter, we consider whether we could go further to facilitate new digital and physical services to be set up via an APMS contract in a way that would help to address issues in access to services.

'The development of digital general practice now offers the possibility that has never before existed – to expand GP capacity for patients in an area even when the GP sessions are provided at some distance. By targeting under-doctored areas, it could help to bring additional capacity into these areas and deliver improvements in access. This would support our wider goals to reduce health inequalities. We would therefore require any such providers to have a credible plan for bringing additional GPs into the area from outside, and to deliver this additionality as an ongoing contractual requirement.'

In a briefing with Pulse, NHS England national director for strategy and innovation Ian Dodge said: 'We start a debate as to whether or not there should be any circumstances in which it is easier for people to set up new practices. For example, in our most under-doctored communities, if that is a way of bringing in extra GPs and tackling inequality rather than making it worse.

'We pose a series of questions and we will be engaging with a lot of people, including the BMA and GPC.'

The consultation closes on 23 August. 

Earlier this month, NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens said digital services will help ease GP shortages.

This comes after Hammersmith and Fulham CCG approved GP at Hand’s expansion to Birmingham, with a limited list size of 2,600.

Related images

  • phone - smartphone - app - mobile - online

Readers' comments (7)

  • Yep excellent idea as ever, would no doubt take all the other listed patients I saw this AM freeing my valuable time to concentrate 110% on chasing/sorting the safeguarding issue that was on the same AM list. (took 5 calls, 2 e mails and advised at one point to leave patient name on voicemail)

    Oh yea, like I said yesterday another day another article nearer sticking two fingers up!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Real docs for the rich, robots and a few named blame sinks for the poor.
    Swedish primary care funding model would resolve inverse care provision of primary care in the UK.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • why would they be in any way interested? the whole set up is designed to not being involved with such areas and patients, unless they are being paid a massive premium to do so. In that case why not pay the people doing the work now so that they will stay. bonkers planning.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Right

    So the doctors in underpaid deprived areas now lose their healthy patients to private companies, leaving them with the most complex only

    This is the most bizarre development and surprising it has NHSE backing

    Why not offer deprived practices funding and support to set this up for their patients? Isn’t this the point of the PCN???!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wouldn't work in rural or remote areas where internet access is either totally lacking or very poor, and GPs deal with minor injuries & cottage hospital services.
    How do "Digital First" services amanage in areas where the nearest A&E is over an hour away?

    "Digital First" could only cover patients who could afford digital access - which rules out many in deprived areas & most in remote areas.

    GPatHand patients are mostly young, mobile & healthy - but consume more health services than those registered with regular practices.

    Does NHS England ever think things through?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The consultation is designed to produce the answers they want, with negatively phrased questions with yes no responses required!

    The fact that they have no idea what primary care is doesn't seem to be preventing them from destroying it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say