This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

BMA announces judicial review and more strike action over contract imposition

The BMA has announced it is launching a judicial review over what is calls the ‘embarrassing’ revelation that the Government failed to carry out an equality impact assessment before imposing a new contract on junior doctors in England.

It has also announced three more 48-hour strikes in March and April, during which junior doctors will only provide emergency care.

Junior doctor leaders said that the failure to undertake an equality impact assessment was ’yet another example of the incompetence which the Government has demonstrated throughout its handling of this dispute’.

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt this month announced that he was imposing a contract on junior doctors after talks broke down over the issue of evening and weekend pay, with the Government refusing to step back from its decision to remove ‘unsociable hours’ pay premiums from Saturdays and weekday evenings.

The BMA had said it was looking into the legality of the imposition in an email to junior doctors over the weekend, adding that further strike action was ’inevitable’.

It has announced the dates of the new action. They are:

  • 48-hour emergency care only from 8am, Wednesday 9 March to 8am, Friday 11 March
  • 48-hour emergency care only from 8am, Wednesday 6 April to 8am, Friday 8 April
  • 48-hour emergency care only from 8am, Tuesday 26 April to 8am, Thursday 28 April.

It also revealed that the Government had ‘failed to provide evidence’ that it had had any due regard for equality issues when imposing the contract, as required under the Equality Act 2010.

Dr Johann Malawana, BMA junior doctor committee chair, said: ’In recent weeks I have heard from thousands of junior doctors across the country, and the resounding message is that they cannot and will not accept what the Government is trying to do.

’It now appears that in trying to push through these changes the Government failed to give proper consideration to the impact this contract could have on junior doctors. This is yet another example of the incompetence which the Government has demonstrated throughout its handling of this dispute.’

He added: ’The Government can avert this action by re-entering talks with the BMA and addressing the outstanding issues and concerns junior doctors have, rather than simply ignoring them.

’If it pushes ahead with plans to impose a contract that junior doctors have resoundingly rejected we will be left with no option but to take this action. The Government must put patients before politics, get back around the table and find a negotiated solution to this dispute.’

A Department of Health spokesperson said: 'Further strike action is completely unnecessary and will mean tens of thousands more patients face cancelled operations – over a contract that was 90% agreed with the BMA and which senior NHS leaders including Simon Stevens have endorsed as fair and safe. The new contract will mean an average 13.5% basic pay rise, and will bring down the maximum number of hours doctors can work. 

‘We urge junior doctors to look at the detail of the contract and the clear benefits it brings.’

What the contract includes

The junior doctor contract imposed by health secretary Jeremy Hunt includes:

  • An increase in basic pay of 13.5%;
  • Redefining the definition of ‘plain time’ to include Saturday from 7am to 5pm;
  • Paying a premium of 30% for Saturday ‘plain time’ working, if the doctor works one in four weekends;
  • Reduce the definition of ‘safe hours’ from 91 to 72 hours a week;
  • Doctors will not work more than four consecutive nights – down from seven currently;
  • The maximum number of consecutive ‘long days’ will be reduced from seven to five;
  • A new ‘Guardian’ role will be introduced, with the authority to impose fines for breaches to agreed working hours, which will be invested in educational resources and facilities for trainees.

Read more here

Readers' comments (30)

  • This news regarding a judicial review actually made my day. Go on guys and gals, show the way to our sleazy leaders in LMCs how to deal with JH and gang.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Read the leading article on BBC News Health this morning
    Junior doctors' row: Hunt's 6,000 deaths claim 'was unverified'
    By Sarah Bloch

    Nigel, are you going to publish anything on this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'sleazy leaders in LMCs'

    Ask to attend your LMC meeting or go on local website to see what they are doing for you locally. If you are speaking from a position of knowledge, I apologise, if not make it part of your PDP

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As the pound falters and public services get slashed, expect support for this to evaporate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • BBC Today programme this am: 6000 deaths now 11,000 after peer review.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hunt misrepresented data on 7-day NHS
    BBC WEBSITE 24.2.2016

    BMA should refuse to engage with Mr Hunt for the reason of his dishonesty and on what is his personal agenda and should be sacked. How can this man stay in office! You would be struck off on any dishonesty/manipulation on research material.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • im sorry im loosing track of this one. what is so bad with the contract they have been offered?

    ok its imposed and thats bad - but is it that bad?

    i agree the data that weekend deaths is higher is crap - the bbc had a programme that dispelled that. but this sounds good. increase in basic pay. less nights in a row, less hours in a week? i would have liked this when i was a junior doing a 1 in 3 with prospective cover almost killed me. then another job with 7 12 hour nights in a row - straight in from a week of days inc on call onto a week of days with not a day off was also horrendous.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As is evident from today's PMQ, Hunt is carrying out direct orders of Cameron.Radical decisions need to be made by the profession as Hunt is not alone and he knows that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Partner 6:49pm

    Your missing the main point. Their loosing their banding so even with the 13% pay life their taking an overall pay cut!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @medical student 8:45 - thanks but thats partly my point. on TV there are a lot of JDs going on about pt safety - the reality is the JDs will work less strenuous hours on this contract (and perhaps get less experience) - yes they may (and I'm not sure based on the figures) get less pay. but thats a different message - please sir we don't want to earn less... welcome to the last 10 years of general practice - and it might not play as well with the public. The BMa is confusing issues here. Hunt is a clever sod - who wants to do odd things to the NHS - yes we shouldn't trust him but thats not what they are arguing and by arguing something that can be disproven they run the risk of loosing credibility.

    don't get me wrong - the 7day idea is rubbish - I'm not even convinced its a vote winner so i don't get their obsession with it. they will be having a go at consultants next - some of whom still make a pretty penny in waiting list initiates and private practice - so wont get the publics vote quite as easily as JDs. they are trying to turn GPs salaried - the whole system is a mess - waiting lists are going up - the system is broke. workforce planning is years out of date. its just insane but the JDs need to be careful they know what they are striking for and aren't being used as a political football.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say