Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

BMA suspends this month's industrial action over safety fears

The BMA has announced that it is suspending the industrial action scheduled for later this month, due to NHS England concerns that the service will not cope. 

BMA junior doctors committee chair Dr Ellen McCourt said that the committee was concerned about plans for patient safety over the week of 12 September if the five-day strike went ahead.

In a statement, the BMA said that it had met with NHS England, who said they needed more time to plan for the industrial action - despite the BMA giving the statutory seven days notice.

It added that the action over October, November and December would continue unless the Government stopped its plans to impose the contract.

At the same time, health secretary Jeremy Hunt claimed that 1 million hospital appointments would need to be cancelled as a result of the planned strikes.

The latest development has come amid criticism of the BMA’s stance from the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges - which itself came under fire from member colleges, including the RCGP.

Earlier today, the GMC and Health Education England intervened, warning that doctors’ training and registration were being put in jeopardy if they decided to take part in the strike.

Dr McCourt said: ’Over the past few days we have been described as radical, we have been described as militant, we have been described as prioritising ourselves over our patient’s safety.

’This is not true. Patient safety remains doctors’ primary concern. For the first time in this dispute NHS England have told us that a service under such pressure cannot cope with the notice period for industrial action given.’

She said that the committee has listened to concerns of doctors, patients and the public: ’Thousands of you have been in touch, your level of anger over the Secretary of State’s imposed contract remains high, but at the same time you want to keep your patients safe during industrial action.

’The BMA is therefore suspending the industrial action planned for the week of 12 September. The remaining programme of industrial action stays in place.’

In a statement to Parliament, Mr Hunt welcomed the decision to cancel these strikes, but warned that the future dates for industrial action would cause problems. 

He said: ’We currently anticipate around up to 100,000 elective operations will be cancelled and up to a million hospital appointments will be postponed, inevitably impacting on our ability to hit the vital 18 weeks performance standard.’

A DH spokesperson said: ’The public will be relieved that the BMA has decided to call off the first phase of these unprecedented strikes, so this is welcome news. But if the BMA were really serious about patient safety, they would immediately cancel their remaining plans for industrial action which, as the GMC says, will only cause patients to suffer.’

 

 

Readers' comments (23)

  • Smart move.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • That's it. I'm off. Finish this afternoon's list and then the NHS can be one more doctor down

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not smart. This is game over. Strikes after the contract is already imposed will be useless. The support is waning anyway and every time the BMA fucks up it just goes down. Most juniors won't even strike next time because they'll think what's the point, making any subsequent action useless. Congtats BMA you screwed the NHS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is a smart move but on the other hand I feel like the BMA is not sure what to do!
    Why no body question J. Hunt when he is cutting funding and putting patients at risk. Today the GMC speaker on radio 4 sound like her works for J Hunt. He said the doctors will like be question if patients are affected. Can the GMC question J Hunt, Also doctors should be run by doctors not by politician who are not regulated by GMC.
    I feel so sorry for the JD and the patients.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A shame the risk assessment didn't take place BEFORE the announcement

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hunt 1 - Docs nil.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Better to enquire how many days they need, and then reschedule action for then.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Shows weakness to Hunt and poorly thought through strategy/consultation to the general public whom we need the support of

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @4.38pm
    I'm sure you already know that the GMC certainly doesn't work for the government. It is the independent regulatory body for doctors. It's key function is to protect patients and to set standards for students and doctors and to act when those standards are not met. As such it was absolutely right to intervene with warnings about the risk to patient care on the short notice impending 5 day strike next week.

    I wonder how the JDs who intend to join the strikes in the next few months can think that, on the one hand, they are vital to the NHS and patient care - but, on the other hand, think that no patient will suffer if they don't turn up for work 5 days running? I believe the former but definitely not the latter.

    There are ways and ways. To go from one extreme to another by first recommending the new contract and then calling for several long walk-outs has reduced the public standing of the BMA to near zero, with that of the JDs not far behind.

    The argument is lost.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The argument is not lost 5.29pm. Public opinion is confused, now is the time to launch information to educate the public. The imposition of the new contract may provide more evidence of how damaging it is so it may be more useful to strike after the imposition in October. Best wishes
    GP Partner

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.