This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

New £8,200 GP trainee pay premium will 'match current pay'

GP trainees will receive a pay premium of £8,200 per year while on placement in GP practices, which NHS Employers said would ’ensure current level of pay is matched in the new system’.

The latest incentive to attract medical graduates to choose general practice as a career and abate the current GP workforce crisis was one of a raft of measures imposed in reforms of junior doctor’s contract last week.

Last year, BMA had claimed the Government’s initial proposals to cut the training supplement could lead to a pay cut of almost a third, or 31%.

But it is not clear how this premium will affect GP trainees relative to their other junior doctor colleagues, as it is being introduced to replace the previous GP supplement which is based on their banding plus a 45% supplement.

Last week’s imposition followed protacted negotiations and breakdowns in talks between the Government and the BMA - and two days of strike action this year.

The new contract, which will see weekdays from 7am to 9pm and Saturdays 7am to 5pm redefined as ‘plain time’ - working hours that will not attract an unsociable hours pay premium – in exchange for a 13.5% increase in base pay.

Previous NHS Employers guidance on the contract negotiations explained that ‘flexible practice premiums will be used for those in hard-to-fill training programmes’, and applies to doctors who switch to these specialties.

The NHS Employers guidance for the final imposed contract states: ‘Pay premium paid to GP trainees in practice to ensure current level of pay is matched in the new system…’

But it added that the premium ’will only be paid to doctors undertaking general practice placements as part of a general practice training programme (replacing the GP supplement)’ and will ’not be paid to those trainees whilst they are in hospital or other community placements, or to trainees on other programmes (e.g. F2) undertaking placements in general practice’.

Dr Hamed Khan, a GP in Surrey, an A&E doctor and a clinical lecturer at St George’s, University of London, said: ’I’ve heard conflicting things about this, and some trainees have calculated it and said it will be lower to them, while a few have said it will roughly amount to the same.

’The feeling is that GP will be less affected than the other specialties, but it’s uncertain and I’m not sure if people have calculated it to the extent that hospital doctors have to work out exactly how much better or worse-off they’ll be as a result.’

Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, who went on strike last month at her training practice in north London, said: ‘Our concerns are straightforward. The pay premia is “flexible” to be applied as necessary in areas of staff shortages.

’This therefore suggests that after implementation it will likely be withdrawn from areas with sufficient applicants, such as London and the South East. This will mean that trainees who are relying on the higher salary will have no option but to apply to areas of shortage which tend to be far flung… HEE will deny this currently but it is our prediction.’

Pulse approached the BMA but they were unable to comment at time of publication.

Flexible pay premia

Including general practice, the final contract offer will give premia to four specialties - including emergency medicine; oral and maxillofacial surgery; and psychiatry - as well as those undertaking academic placements.

These specialties have been most hard-pressed to fill places in recent years, and Pulse revealed this month that applications for GP training – which receives the largest premium – had fallen 6% this year.

Currently the GP Registrar (GPR) supplement for junior doctors entering a GP practice placement stands at 45% of basic pay, and without the BMA says ‘GPs would be paid on average 31% less than hospital trainees’.

When action group GP Survival highlighted this risk last autumn, it prompted the RCGP to call for a ‘cast-iron guarantee’ that plans to remove the supplement would not reduce GP trainee pay and further undermine attempts to increase recruitment.

Chair of the GPC Junior Doctors Committee, Dr Donna Tooth, has previously warned that the new pay premium system ‘would be less stable than the current supplement… and could be removed over time.’

More than one in ten training places went unfilled across England last year, despite three rounds of recruitment and an overhaul of the application method that allowed failed candidates to reapply.

Readers' comments (15)

  • Yes that is going to help GP recruitment!😧?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Back in 2005 when i entered the VTS training I was in band 2A jobs as an SHO and in my GP placement had a generous fuel supplement of around 400 odd quid a month if I remember correctly which took my net to around 3k per month. That was generous in those days. i wonder what trainees will be making net PER MONTH with this new scheme?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't think 18 months of pay 'premiums' which is basically unaltered pay will attract anyone to general practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Based on salaries of those entering training straight after FY2 into a 4 year course (aware most in a 3 year, but this would be my situation):
    GPST 1.2 - current basic pay = £31,838. + 40% banding equating to an extra £12,735= £44,573.
    New contract = current basic + 11% uplift = £35,340 + £8,200 as above = £43,540. So £1033 less.

    GPST3 - current basic pay £35,952 + 45% banding equating to £16,178 = £52,130.
    New contract = current basic + 11% uplift = £39,906 + £8,200 = £48,106. So £4,024 less.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Feel free to correct me if wrong.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • it sounds like theyre maintaining current GP training pay and screwing over all the other specialities.

    Not sure if that will incentise or not...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How long does the incentivisation last for?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Anybody recalls the 'prisoner dilemma' in Game Theory?
    If GP trainees belong to one group of rational decision makers and trainees of other specialties to another .
    Proceed carefully , young Padawans.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I doubt it's gonna change the future of General Practice. We are dealing here with a rare breed of hairy hands. Just applied for Australia.... hope to leave soon.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Several thousand GMC requests for Letters of good standing and doctors will be lost to UK for years to come until they realise there will be almost no staff for a safe service without pillaging overseas doctors again, but who are now aware of the sh!t quality of treatment of our noble profession, and will head to greener pastures too.

    Unsafe/dangerous times ahead for those left holding it all together.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say