Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPC calls off plan to ballot members on mass resignation

The GPC has announced that it will not ballot members on potentially submitting undated resignations or industrial action after claiming that it has won concessions on workload from NHS England.

It announced today that NHS England has agreed to take on board a number of suggestions from the GPC’sUrgent Prescription for General Practice’, including ensuring GPs work within safe limits and longer appointments.

Instead of a ballot, it will be ’surveying members in September asking grassroots GPs for their views on future negotiations with the Government’.

But GPC members have said that NHS England has not delivered against what was demanded by the conference.

A motion at the LMCs Conference in May this year gave NHS England three months to ’accept the Urgent Prescription within three months of this conference’, or face a ballot on mass resignation.

But, with the three month deadline expiring this weekend, the GPC said it had obtained guarantees from NHS England, which it ‘welcomed’.

The letter from NHS England director of commissioning Rosamund Roughton, dated 16 August, says: ’NHS England accepts the BMA’s Urgent Prescription as a good basis for further discussion and work on supporting general practice pressures, also noting that some of the proposals need greater detail. We have continued to discuss the areas that are included in the Urgent Prescription but not in the General Practice Forward View.’

The BMA claims that several of the demands listed in the Urgent Prescription will form the ‘basis of negotiation’, including:

  • Ensuring that GPs work within safe limits each day.
  • Enabling GPs to have longer appointments to meet the needs of patients, and in particular those with complex and multiple problems.
  • Ending inappropriate workload demands on GPs that could be done by other parts of the NHS.
  • Empowering patients to better manage their own health when appropriate.
  • Ending time consuming bureaucracy, such as chasing up hospital actions or re-referring patients, time that could instead be spent providing more appointments to patients.
  • Provide GP practices with more frontline staff and facilities to meet record increase in the public’s demand for GP services, especially from an ageing population.

Dr Chaand Nagpaul, GPC chair, said: ‘In response to the calls from the BMA, NHSE has accepted taking forward our proposals to alleviate the unsustainable pressures on practices. Crucially, NHS England has recognised that GPs need to work within manageable workload limits to ensure safe and quality patient care.

‘The BMA will now be meeting NHS England to develop these proposals further, as well as putting pressure on NHSE to deliver on promises made in its General Practice Forward View plans, so that urgent support is delivered to frontline GP services.’

He added that the GPC ‘will also be proceeding with a survey of the profession in September, to ensure that the profession’s priorities and views are properly taken on board when we continue our negotiations in the future’.

But Dr Dean Eggitt, medical secretary of Doncaster LMC, said that - despite not being supportive of mass resignation himself - NHS England has not put forward a rescue package, which is what the LMCs Conference demanded.

He said: ‘The conference said if you don’t have a solution, a rescue package agreed between NHS England and the Department of Health, we now need to ballot the profession.

’We haven’t got that, we’ve got an agreement that the Urgent Prescription is along the right sort of lines, and the GP Forward View is working towards delivering something, but that’s not what conference mandated is it?

’Conference mandated we either have a rescue package in place, or we go out to ballot the profession.’

Ms Roughton also said that will be enforcing the message that LMCs need to be engaged in local Sustainability and Transformatiion Plans (STP) planning processes, after Pulse revealed that local GPs were being ‘excluded’ from discussions around the plans, will will reshape the local health economies. 

Related images

  • LMCs conference 2013 - voting card - online
  • flu vaccines 330x330

Readers' comments (46)

  • How?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHS ENGLAND WILL SAY ANYTHING TO THE GPC TO KEEP THEM QUIET....THEY COULD NOT CARE LESS ABOUT GPs-WE ARE SIMPLY MEDICAL "CANNON FODDER"-WORTHLESS AND VALUELESS TRASH IN THEIR OPINION.
    ALL THAT WILL HAPPEN IS THE USUAL CYCLE OF PHONING UP THE DAILY ******* MAIL SO THAT THEY CAN "TERRORISE" GPs WITH DERANGED AND RANTING ARTICLES....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ...and that flushing noise you can hear is the sound of the credibility of the GPC disappearing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lets have a motion of no confidence in the GPC and set up an alternative.

    Enough of this nonsense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Did you honestly believe anything other than a staged managed climb down would occur??

    The BMA, GPC, Royal college elite sip champagne round tables with the very people that persecute you.

    These concessions will amount to nothing and most of you probably notice a greater workload in the coming months and years.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm so ashamed of the GPC.
    I'm so ashamed of the GPC.
    I'm so ashamed of the GPC.
    I'm so ashamed of the GPC.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is anyone surprised? The invertebrate tendency of our profession is beyond parody.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr David Barrett

    Give it a chance.
    Whatever is done, it will be like steering around a supertanker in choppy waters, so from what I'm reading at least it's an attempt!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    We live in a totally different world to 1965/66 when the new deal for general practice was forced by undated mass resignation letters. Then, there was no funding for any staff and most GPs worked alone and unsupported from their homes. Now, a large proportion of the workforce is salaried. Would they resign? No, and the practice holding the contract would still have to find a way to "perform".
    Partners could resign their contracts and indeed many are having to do so - but the burden of premises and redundancy issues could take many to bankruptcy.
    If GPC foolishly held a resignation ballot, there would be potentially a small turnout and a very large majority in favour of NOT resigning, however bad things are. This would be a total propaganda gift to J Hunt.
    There are better ways of rightly expressing our disgust with the government and especially the Secretary of State for Health - but a resignation ballot would be a self-imposed disaster for the profession.
    We should continue to fight our corner - but this is not the way to go.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There's only one future now that resistance within the profession has been eliminated

    It's every person for themselves. The profession will really suffer

    DITCH THE COUNTRY COMRADES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say