This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

The waiting game

NHS managers backtrack on vow that all new GP contracts will be APMS

Exclusive NHS England has watered down its policy that any new GP contracts ‘should all be on APMS’ , after Pulse highlighted its position as part of the Stop Practice Closures campaign.

After pressure from the GPC, NHS England told Pulse said it would review practice closures on a ‘case-by-case’ basis, rather than the previous blanket policy of using APMS for all new GP contracts as ‘best practice’.

The GPC has welcomed the change, saying it was a ‘better position’, but added it would only make a difference when it is put into action.

The revised position comes after the GPC wrote to NHS England challenging the legality of its policy to only award APMS contracts, except in the case of a PMS review or a PMS practice reverting to GMS.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul warned that putting all new GP contracts out to procurement would ‘destroy the fabric and ethos of general practice, and throw open the door to private providers running general practice on a commercial basis by remote control’.

A Pulse investigation had revealed that local leaders have have been approached by more than 100 practices are considering closing as a result of funding issues or problems recruiting partners, leading Pulse to start the Stop Practice Closures campaign.

Following the GPC’s intervention, Pulse had asked NHS England to clarify its position, and it said it was ‘continuing’ to review on a case-by-case basis.

Its statement said: ‘NHS England has not made a decision to end the use of GMS or PMS contracts.  We continue to review on a case-by-case basis depending on local circumstances.

‘A practice closure may arise as a consequence of a range of factors. NHS England has a responsibility to secure high quality general practice for all patients affected. Depending on local circumstances, area teams will explore the most appropriate option, and in so doing, will frequently seek legal advice to ensure that process is in line with relevant guidelines and regulations.’

However, despite numerous requests from Pulse, NHS England would not comment on whether it had reversed its position.

GP leaders said this did look like a revision, and said its new policy was a ‘better position’.

Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chair of the GPC, said: ‘It is clear that NHS England can (and should) use GMS and PMS contractual options for new practices. The evidence is also clear that these options provide the highest quality service to local patients. Trying to make short term cost savings through the use of APMS has often led to longer term bigger cost implications and is why so many CCGs have terminated contracts locally.

‘[This] is a better position but it will only make a difference when we see it put in action.’

It comes as a health minister last week revealed that there had been 518 practice closures over the past five years.

Related images

  • PMS contracts - online
gp heroes nominations2020 180x250px

Readers' comments (5)

  • NHS England's destructive view of their future of NHS General Practice I suspect will change in the run up to the next General election and chaps like Dr Berwick will be looking for jobs with their American Health Care Maintenance insurance companies while the rest of us start to rebuild what's left of UK General Practice after the last 2-3 years of the Tory's kicking we've just had that has brought GP to its knees. "What a fine mess you've got me into Ollie"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • silly headline, they're covering themselves . there is no change

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We don't actually care is all too little, too late. Most of us are so ****** off that we are not even listening. I'd love to go salaried-paid sick leave with a medical "pass the parcel" mentality that plagues hospitals/secondary care.
    Bring it on Hunt !!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A bold headline given how how small the policy change to which it refers.

    Either way, it's surely questionable whether the APMS policy would be such a threat.

    Practice contracts are very persistent and only a tiny proportion of the national number of practices come up for procurement each year.

    Surely then it is the financial squeeze that is the real threat to GMS' existence. This is just an overly dramatic sideshow.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why have the Scottish public noticed privatisation of the NHS before the English who seem so much happier to blame problems on GPs. If they separate I wonder if well have plenty of GPs in England after they abandon the Scottish NHS when it suffers spending cuts?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say