Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

The nationwide PMS contract review, and what it means for you

What is going on with PMS contracting? Read our Q&A to get to grips with the ongoing PMS reviews.

What is happening to PMS practice funding?

NHS England area teams are reviewing all PMS contracts - the flexibly negotiated contracts that were introduced to better tackle particular needs of patients based on local priorities - with the view to ensure any extra funding above and beyond what an equivalent GMS practice would get is actually linked to providing extra services.

When will contracts be reviewed?

NHS England has asked all of its area teams to review PMS contracts over the next two years, starting from April this year.

Why is NHS England doing this?

NHS England did a national review of PMS funding and concluded much of it was not in fact linked with offering extra services above and beyond those provided by GMS-contracted practices.

How much money are we talking about?

NHS England identified £260m not explicitly linked to extra services.

And how much for individial practices?

Accountants who have sat down with clients to do the sums have concluded that losses of £50,000 to £150,000 are likely to be common, while some exceptional practices may lose up to £400,000.

What is likely to happen to that money?

Early signs are for area teams to take different approaches to the process. While NHS England’s London area team is creating a single, standardised PMS contract for all the capital, area teams including Essex and Cambridgeshire are effectively phasing out the PMS contracts by gradually reducing their premium over time. The common denominator is that the funding being clawed back looks likely to be used to incentivise both PMS and GMS practices to achieve local outcomes targets in line with local plans.

Does this spell the end of the PMS contract?

NHS England says it wants to keep all of the different contractual models but area teams incentivising PMS practices to switch to GMS seemed to contradict the policy. NHS England has also said it wants GMS practices to also be able to access the extra money currently in the PMS pot.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Incentives for PMS to go Gms. Last statement confuses should be negative incentive

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Look forward to local outcomes what a mess done by partners who retired or old pct staff who can't give steps. Eg. Reduce accident attendances reduce uti admissions . Hospitals should not overinvestigAte and keep uti patients etc .
    Consultants should not do routine follow up
    Nurses should care.
    Try those outcomes

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say