This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Up to 30 CCGs may face legal threat for funding homeopathy

Exclusive Some thirty CCGs may face legal action from scientists if they do not review their spend on homeopathy, Pulse can reveal.

The Good Thinking Society has already forced NHS Liverpool CCG into reviewing a £30,000 annual spend on homeopathy but said it has now written to a further 20-30 CCGs.

Together, the CCGs are thought to be allocating an estimated two-five million pounds towards the practice - which leading doctors have dismissed as ‘witchcraft’ - each year.

The small charity, which describes itself as ‘pro science’, has already filed for judicial review against NHS Liverpool CCG, which has since agreed to review its funding via a public consultation set to launch next month.

The Good Thinking Society’s project director Michael Marshall said every penny spent on homeopathy is ‘a kick in the teeth’ to anyone forced to wait for NHS treatment, with the letters sent to CCGs around England outlining both the lack of evidence for homeopathy and what has happened in the Liverpool case.

He said: ‘We want to give the CCGs the opportunity to start listening to those studies, to make sensible decisions about their funding policies.’

‘At a time when NHS budgets are under scrutiny, it seems like every penny that is spent on homeopathy is a kick in the teeth to anybody who’s waiting for their operation, or has had any other treatment delayed or cancelled due to funding issues.

‘This is money that could be spent on initiatives that are actually proven to be effective.’

A spokesperson for Liverpool CCG said: ‘Liverpool CCG currently resources a small homeopathy contract to the value of £30,000 per year that benefits a small number of patients in the city who choose to access NHS homeopathy care and treatment services.

‘The CCG has agreed with the Good Thinking Society to carry out further engagement with patients and the general public to inform our future commissioning intentions for this service.’

BMA has previously called for homeopathy to be ‘banned’ from the NHS after branding it ‘witchcraft’, however the Department of Health maintains two registers for registration of homeopathic remedies. The national rules scheme run by MHRA was last reviewed in 2012 after being criticised in a House of Commons report, but the review concluded the register should remain.

A BMA spokesperson said: ‘All treatments on the NHS must be clinically proven with clear and identifiable benefits to patients, especially at a time when NHS finances are under real pressure. The BMA does not believe that homeopathy passes this test and as a result it should not be funded by the NHS.’

Readers' comments (39)

  • Hooray! Another homeopathy debate! Bring out the angry weirdos!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Good

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Scientist
    Homeopathy works 30% of the time.
    Angry Weido

    Only joking no leather covered horse hair mallet striking the flask ten time rubbish for me, how can that work?
    Hovering crystals over someone in a scented room until it relieves them of a pile of cash for me!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Good, perhaps they could also look at the millions wasted on other non evidence based treatments for which there is no treatment options , eg steroid injections for frozen shoulder

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I hope they apply this to all unscientific things like politicians for example- they are worse because unlike homoeopathy which believes in adding a tiny amount of poison to cure things they add lots of poison (eg Social care act) to good things (NHS) and make it bad.
    However Politicians can be treated by Homoeopathy method- they have verbal diarrhoea and flatulence all the time with pre-election flare ups which can be countered by some of the same by the opposite party.
    So I strongly support homoeopathy for politicians but not for most normal human beings!
    Perhaps its irrational to expect Human beings to be rational (TM-Myself)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Took Early Retirement


    Since a lot of GPs use the term very loosely, I think it would be difficult to look at. I only diagnosed about 3 "true cases" (IMHO) in my career, but I injected a hell of a lot of shoulders and subacromial bursae for other reasons.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    It's Friday night, and I'm going to go out and get smashed on homeopathic lager.

    The best ones don't even have a single lager atom in them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob you have said it all. I was going to add in my thoughts but they have been scrambled by the homeopathic lager

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The only reason homeopathy may work is because it is water. And we are water. Genius.
    Off to lidl I am.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What options do the "pro-science" lobby offer to people whose problems aren't well catered for by "science"?

    It's sad that patients' options to choose treatments that apparently (for whatever reason) work in some way to ameliorate their suffering are being removed.

    Is the aim of the NHS to promote "science" or to treat suffering people?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say