This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

CCG in talks over moving to wholly salaried model of general practice

Exclusive A CCG has revealed that it is in talks with GPs about a projected move to a completely salary-based model of primary care in a bid to tackle major recruitment problems in the area, Pulse can reveal.

NHS Hull CCG has met with all 57 of its constituent practices to collect feedback on the types of model that they would like to adopt in future as an alternative to the majority GMS contract arrangements currently in place.

But chief officer Emma Latimer told Pulse that moving to a completely salaried model was the CCG’s ‘ultimate aim’.

The CCG is aiming to use the increased primary care commissioning powers to ‘decide on new models of care’ to implement in 2016-17.

Ms Latimer told Pulse: ‘Moving to a completely salaried model is our ultimate aim, but there’s quite a road to get there. We’re looking to create new models of care on a bigger footprint. We’ve got four or five practices working together, not necessarily federating, but developing new models of care and organisation forms.

‘For 2015-16, the CCG’s focus will be on deciding new models of primary care. We’re looking to work with people in the next 12 months to develop the models, with a view to starting in 2016-17.’

Hull is among the areas worst affected by the national GP recruitment and retention crisis, with just a current ratio of just 43 doctors per 100,000 patients (the national average is 59.5). 30% of Hull’s 57 GP practices are run by singlehanded GPs, many of whom are of or are approaching retirement age.

Earlier this year, the CCG announced a recruitment package offering GPs the chance to go on six-month overseas sabbaticals and be given funding to undertake MBAs in leadership in a bid to tackle the problems.

Under co-commissioning plans, NHS England wants CCGs take on more responsibility for primary care, including tackling recruitment problems.

Hull CCG has already signalled its interest to take on the highest level of primary care commissioning. In an expression of interest document sent to NHS England in June this year and seen by Pulse, the CCG said they wanted delegated responsibility for commissioning PMS, APMS and DESs from April 2015, budget responsibility for premises, and the power to make decisions on new providers and practice mergers.

Ms Latimer told Pulse: ‘Co-commissioning is a vehicle to help us deliver new models of care, without a shadow of a doubt. The more resources we have to work with, the more flexibility we have about how we use that resource. We’re looking to take over the commissioning of the contracts, which will give us the headroom to do this new model of care.

She added: ‘In the future, GPs’ employers could could be a social enterprise, they could be a hospital, they could be a GP consortium or federation or a social enterprise. It won’t be the CCG, because we’re not into provision.’

Ms Latimer acknowledged that such a move would not be universally popular.

She added: ‘We’re not expecting all GPs to want this – there’s a lot of fear around it. Some are frightened of change or are happy with what they’ve got, and you can understand that. Therefore, any alternative has to be attractive enough for people to want to get involved.

‘People don’t think the CCG is here to support them, because they’re so used to PCTs being quite autocratic. But we’re talking to GPs about their estates options. A lot of GPs have bought their buildings and own the asset, so are worried about disposal. We’re talking to them about how they can potentially dispose of that asset, and we’re also talking about the HR implications of staff moving.

‘Many doctors are also used to the GMS contract and the guarantees that gives them. At the moment, the majority of our contracts are GMS but there’s a recognition from some GPs that it’s out of date for how they want to practice.’


Readers' comments (66)

  • And where is the money going to come from to buy my premises as why should I carry on with the risks and costs of?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well at least my suspicions on co-commissioning are finally confirmed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Any Hull GP's want to comment (anonymously)?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And then there's the extra 20% of GP's needed to cover sick leave .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How will this address the recruitment crisis(not just of GPs but also other valuable members of our team)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Aren't CCGs *membership* organisations, with the GP practices as the Members?
    If the CCG reaches its stated aims of having an all-salaried GP service, with the GPs employed by unspecified other organisations, won't the CCG have *no* members - and presumably therefore can no longer exist?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • i would welcome this decision.Salaried GPs are exploited by the partners. If all are salaried there would be uniformity & working atmosphere would be better.This model should be the future of GP in England

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Nobody is surprised in here.
    Obviously , if this is what people ,especially the younger ones coming through, want , it will happen no matter what.
    Question is 'Is this really what the majority of us want?'
    Interested to read comments from colleagues in Hull

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent idea. Only issue they may have is buying our mortgaged clinic building, paying the energy bills, paying the GPs salary, taking on the salaries of our twelve administrative staff and nurses (all salaries protected I hope?), paying petrol for house visits (or should we have cars/drivers like OOH GPs?), covering staff absences/sickness/holidays... and best of all take on all managerial responsibility. I'll just turn up and see patients, and leave exactly on time at the end of each and every day. Yes, I can this happening. Not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Took Early Retirement

    I would like to think the 2 salaried GP that were at my former practice (not there simultaneously) didn't feel exploited. Pro-rata, at times, one of them earned more than the partners, I know.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say