Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPC set to oppose co-commissioning of primary care

GP leaders have rejected plans for CCGs to co-commission primary care, warning that such a move will ‘fatally damage relations’ between practices and commissioners

Delegates at the LMCs Conference expressed their ‘alarm’ at moves by NHS England to give CCGs control of the GP contract, warning it would lead to ‘unacceptable’ conflicts of interest.

The local leaders voted in favour of the motion, which added that the proposals will ‘undermine the credibility of CCGs’ and will now ‘insist that GP core contracts should not be held by CCGs’.

Proposing the motion, Dr Aneel Bikhu of Nottinghamshire LMC told the conference the GPC should petition NHS England and the Department of Health to learn from the problems of PCTs.

Dr Bikhu said: ‘We should urge the Secretary of State, and the NHS’s new chief executive, to pause for a moment to consider the lessons of history and allow CCGs to continue their work in their present form, without the distraction and potential cause of future conflict that co-commissioning of GP contracts represents.’

Dr Mitch Garsin of Hillingdon LMC, also speaking in favour of the motion, told the conference commissioning with clinical leadership had been working successfully.

But he added: ‘Now we’re faced with the ultimate poisoned chalice, so called co-commissioning.’

‘Some of my colleagues in CCGs see its potential to bring much needed money and resources into general practice… other, darker elements in CCG leadership see it as a way to performance manage a profession, to harass our less finance savvy, more patient-centred colleagues out of existence.’

Speaking against the motion, Dr Barry Moyse of Somerset LMC criticised the motion’s ‘absolutist language’.

He told the conference: ‘I oppose most of this motion, not because of co-commissioning not having risks associated with it. But because of the absolutist language of the text.’

NHS England leaders are currently developing proposals that will allow CCGs to take a greater role in co-commissioning primary care.

All parts of motion 11 were carried by the conference.

Click here to read our liveblog

Motion 11 in full

AGENDA COMMITTEE to be proposed by NOTTINGHAMSHIRE That conference views with alarm proposals contained in NHS England’s (NHSE) interim response to the ‘call for action for general practice’ to make CCGs co-commissioners of GP contracts and

(i) believes that this will fatally damage relations between CCGs and their constituents CARRIED

(ii) warns that this will undermine CCGs’ chances of success in other areas of commissioning CARRIED

(iii) predicts this will undermine the credibility of CCGs CARRIED

(iv) asserts that conflicts of interests would be unacceptable CARRIED

(v) insists that GP core contracts should not be held by CCGs. CARRIED

Readers' comments (4)

  • The right result, but I predict that they won't listen to you, and you'll end up being the masters of your own destruction, which was probably the plan all along...

    and the Daily Mail will have a field day with the COIs!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I BLAME THE DAILY MAIL. IT IS THE DAILY MAIL THAT HAS SIGNIFICANTLY CONTRIBUTED TO THE GP CRISIS BY ITS ENDLESS RABID ATTACKS. THIS "NEWSPAPER" HAS DONE THE PUBLIC A DISSERVICE AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC SHOULD BE ENRAGED BY THE CONTINUED BEHAVIOUR OF THIS MEDIA "RAG".
    I RIGHTLY USE THE DAILY MAIL TO PUT DIRTY SHOES ON OR CLEAN UP MESS AND THEY SHOULD BE CLEANING UP THE DAMAGE THAT, IN MY OPINION, THEY HAVE CAUSED UNNECESSARILY TO PATIENTS

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • yes, I blame the Daily Mail too! PULSE-please do a survey asking GPs whether they feel The media has damaged recruitment and retention of GPs?
    or are you too worried about upsetting The Daily Mail??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Martin Kittel

    As GP commissioner I tend to disagree with the before said , not in terms of the Daily Mail comments, which have overall not been helpful, but in terms of Co-Commissioning. I believe the GPC is missing a trick here. How can we stop working in silos if we don't stop commissioning in silos. I would like to see a form of "integrated commissioning" . I also believe, that unless more funds are shifted into practices (and this means more (? Non-existing) nurses and doctors in surgeries) we are unable to move services into the community and keep patients out of hospitals. The Better Care Fund gives us this opportunity and the local area teams currently so detached from what's happening on the ground, it is frightening!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say