Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP out-of-hours services perform better than commercial providers

Commercial out-of-hours companies may provide poorer care compared to not-for-profit providers, a major analysis has suggested.

The BMJ study of 80,000 patient survey responses, which researchers said was the first of its kind, found that ratings for overall experience, timeliness and the level of confidence and trust in the doctor or nurse were on average 3% lower for commercial providers compared with not-for-profit services.

The researchers said that in 2013/14 there were 5.8m GP out-of-hours contacts, costing around £400m.

Of these, social enterprise models - including GP-led not-for-profit services - were thought to account for 56.1%, GP practice providers for 2.4%, commercial services for 22.6% and other NHS-run services for 20.2%.

However, lead researcher Professor John Campbell, professor of general practice and primary care at the Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, said the results should be interpreted with caution, noting that the best-rated commercially run out-of-hours providers scored better than many not-for-profit or NHS organisations.

He added: ‘This is a large-scale and robust study, and yields interesting results that warrant further investigation and understanding… There are variations and examples of good practice among all providers but the overall trend is that patients report less positive experiences with commercial providers and we now need to understand why this is the case.’

The news comes as a study published last week suggested opening up general practice provision to private companies via APMS contracts may have worsened patient care.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Vinci Ho

    Here you go;
    What is the definition of a Black Cat? What is that of a White Cat?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is too simplistic. While private organisations do have to have margins for their shareholders, the amounts paid by commissioners is vastly different. If all OOH providers were similarly resourced rather than being at the mercy of CCGs a comparison would possibly be valid

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think this suggests that the quest for profits can get in the way of patient care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.