This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Hunt: GPs to be held accountable for care round-the-clock as 'named clinicians'

Health secretary Jeremy Hunt has announced that older patients with complex health needs will be assigned a single ‘named clinician’ accountable for their care at all times when they are out of hospital, and has suggested this should be their GP.

Mr Hunt said that the move was intended to drive forward better-integrated, coordinated out-of-hospital care, ensuring ‘patients and relatives have a single point of information and responsibility for their care’.

But the announcement has been met with bemusement by GP leaders, who said that GPs already were responsible for their patients out of hospital.

The announcement marked the the 65th anniversary of the NHS and a major public consultation on a raft of new proposals to ‘refresh’ the NHS Mandate and improve the care of elderly people.

The proposals include developing new recommendations ‘to extend GP choice’, applying the ‘friends and family test’ to practices by the end of 2014 and improving access to primary care through the greater use of technology and ‘rapid walk-in access’.

But in a speech today, Mr Hunt chose to focus on a proposal to have a ‘single, named contact to coordinate an individual’s care’.

He explained: ‘We need to know that there is a clinician accountable for vulnerable older people in the community just as there is a consultant responsible for them in hospital.

‘As a member of the public I would like that to be my GP - but whoever it is they should be named so that patients, families and carers all know where the buck stops.’

NHS England will be asked to have named clinicians for elderly patients with complex health needs in place from April 2014, with the proposals a key plank of the new NHS Mandate for next year. Mr Hunt said that he hoped named clinicians would cover every patient in due course, although he did not offer a timescale for this expansion of the scheme.

The Department of Health said that they would seek views on their proposals to improve the care of older people over the summer and a plan would be produced to implement them with NHS England in the autumn.

A spokesperson said: ‘The final plan will be published in October and will be reflected in the refreshed mandate to NHS England for 2014 to 2015.’

Mr Hunt first floated the ‘named clinician’ proposals at a King’s Fund conference in May and the Government has earmarked £3.8 billion for better care integration and helping older people out of hospital in its recent spending review.

Speaking to Pulse, GPC chair Dr Laurence Buckman said he was ‘puzzled’ by the announcement as every patient already has a named GP.

‘He’s announced it repeatedly, we don’t know what it means. We’re going to be talking to Government officials to find out,’ Dr Buckman said.

‘Every patient already has a named GP. GPs are responsible – I don’t know what he thinks this means.’

RCGP chair Dr Clare Gerada said that the RCGP welcomed the emphasis on GPs’ central role in delivering care for the vulnerable, she had reservations about what the Government is really intending and where the money will be spent.

She said: ‘We’re terribly worried that this will mean £3.8 billion going into the private sector – that it will be a tendering process led by the corporate healthcare providers, the likes of Virgin who will set up integrated care organisations that will employ GPs but will be separate from general practice and will end up being money being siphoned away.’

‘Rather than that we think this should be directly invested in primary care. We have the best integrated care in the world – it’s called the general practice and multidisciplinary care team. If we build on that, if this £3.8 billion comes into primary care, we will deliver the best integrated services for our vulnerable elderly people as well as continue to provide care for everybody else.’

Related images

  • Jeremy Hunt - online
  • Jeremy Hunt - online

Readers' comments (85)

  • Ok flip it make the patients responsible for understanding their care needs then set up a plan. You give this duty to already overworked areas with no thought to staff we are in the NHS to care who cares for the staff they will leave, stressed overworked and public opinion when it is presented in this way will not help. Who is the marshall in town? We need common sense clear thinking and communication plans first not shifting work loads measured against care plans alone. Give some plans to primary and secondary care see what we come up with theres the challenge back.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think its time we all moved our bed into our surgeries so that patients can have access to us 24/7.17th of January cant come soon enough

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Please please please can we not go down the pathway of care plans. Our district nurses spend more time writing meaningless trivial care plans than actually hands on caring for the patient

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    IF GP TAKE 24HR Control WHERE DOES THE European working hours directive come in to the thinking. Oh silly me we can veto that, it doesn't suit us. Hunt has lost the plot silly me he never had it!!!
    If doctors are the cause of the NHS woes, when are the MP going to realise that they are the real cause of our ills. No Idea, No sense, only interested in ripping off the electorate and more worried about the next election than common sense and responsible governing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The man is clueless of what is talking about.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely this concept goes against the working time regulations and why hospital doctors and juniors are not aloud to work more than 48hrs per week. How is it then that the powers that be want GP's to be on call 24/7? they will still have to continue with their surgeries during the day!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thank God I am out of it, RETIRED

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why do many of us react so emotionally to this report? Obviously nobody is asking for a gp to be on call 24 hours a day 365 days a year. Most of us have opted out of OOH care & no longer have that responsibility. During in hours care it is not unreasonable for a gp who knows that patient to be responsible for their care personally.This essentially is an OOH problem. I am quite sure that you as an elderly patient would like the 'safety' of knowing you only had one contact point to go for care rather than have to fight the present OOH arrangements with unknown paramedics/nurses trying to eventually assess the situation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • EU working time directive would prohibit a GP being "available" 168 hours a week 52 weeks a year.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • " in a move he said was a first step towards GPs taking on round-the-clock responsibility for all patients."

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say