This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP practices do not have sufficient input in CCG mergers, says BMA

Current guidance does not allow GP practices to have sufficient input in CCG merger propositions, the BMA has warned. 

In a recent letter sent to NHS England, the BMA said CCG mergers should only go ahead after receiving 'sufficiently clear' approval from their member practice. 

The letter, seen by Pulse, also calls on NHS England to make amendments to its guidance for CCGs wishing to merge, so that they place practices at the heart of merger proposals. 

This comes after the Public Accounts Committee, which has been scrutinising CCG performance, said GPs should be involved in CCG decisions, as services are increasingly commissioned across larger areas and commissioners risk 'losing touch' with their local population. 

As set out in the NHS long-term plan, integrated care systems (ICS) will cover the country by 2021 - which will see one CCG per ICS area - meaning there will be fewer coommissioners who will become responsible for larger geographical areas.

Writing to NHS England's acting director of primary care, Dr Nikita Kanani, and director of primary care delivery, Dominic Hardy, BMA GP Committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey said GPs are 'extremely alarmed' about the lack of GP engagement with CCGs deciding to pursue a merger. 

He said: 'I am writing to you to express GPC England’s profound concern that current guidance is enabling CCG mergers to go ahead without sufficiently clear approval from their member practices, and to urge you to review how these decisions are made.

'Given the goal set out in the long-term plan to reduce the current number of CCGs to as few as one per local health system, the number of proposed mergers is likely to increase. We have heard from members who are extremely alarmed that mergers appear to be rapidly moving forward in their areas without clear approval from, or sufficient engagement with, local GPs.'

Dr Vautrey argued the recent changes to the procedures for CCGs to apply for constitution change, merger or dissolution have 'watered down the need for commissioners to secure the support of local practices before pursuing mergers', jeopardising GPs input and expertise at CCG level. 

He said: 'The updated guidance requires CCGs to show that they have engaged with and considered the views of member practices.

However, GPC strongly believes that all such mergers should only be sanctioned if CCGs can clearly demonstrate that approval has been obtained from local member practices and PCNs. Furthermore, it is increasingly clear that there is a need for greater engagement with local practices and LMCs throughout the merger application in general.

'In the case of some CCG mergers (particularly those across large geographies) there is an inherent risk that local GP participation in commissioning decisions will be significantly reduced. This risks the possibility of diminishing the accountability of CCGs to their local GPs.'

Last year, NHS England mandated all CCGs to reduce their running costs by 20% by 2020/21, which will be 'reinvested in improving patient care and supporting services transformation as part of the long-term plan'. 

However, Dr Vautrey warned mergers should not occur on the basis of financial savings if they risk impacting patient care.    

He said: 'GPC England is extremely concerned that mergers are being rendered necessary and unavoidable by virtue of the 20% reduction in CCG running costs set out in the long-term plan. GPC England strongly opposes mergers going ahead motivated by cost savings: high quality commissioning, provider support and continuity of care must be always be prioritised over financial targets.

'Given these concerns, we would strongly urge NHS England to amend the relevant guidance to make clear that CCG mergers should only go ahead where clear approval is given by member practices and take necessary steps to enforce this.'

An NHS England spokesperson said: 'Commissioners are indeed required to reduce their administrative costs by 20% and all savings are being reinvested in local health services.

'CCGs are therefore right to look for efficiencies, while at the same time individual GP practices also have the opportunity to work closely with their Primary Care Network on strengthening local GP and primary care services.'

Pulse reported last month that a collaboration of eight CCGs in London were in discussions to merge into a single organisation

And this week, Pulse learned that some CCGs fear they will not have sufficient resources to provide the £1.50 per head for primary care networks the CCG in light of increased financial pressures

Readers' comments (5)

  • When have we ever had input!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Turn out the lights - we have and we are - simply wont happen here if not all the ccgs of us agree

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ‘Reinvest the savings in care’ = pay off a small chunk of the hospital overspend.
    Merged CCGs mean an end to any grassroot GP involvement in commissioning - though that has has really been minimal due to obstruction and sabotage and misdirection by CCG management and NEDs.
    Merged CCGs mean an end to real accountability - not that commissioners are ever held to account for poor decisions and the top-slicing and redirection of funds meant for frontline general practice.
    Merged CCGs mean an end to localism, and a new wave of cosy commissioner-hospital sub-dom relationships, with general practice, mental health and community services left on the outside.
    PCNs? They have two years before practices start quitting when the money and resources no longer match the expectations placed on them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I suggest we all insist on a vote, and we all vote against it. If they want this major change, let them put it through the appropriate legislation. If they really want to avoid that, let’s negotiate a decent settlement for general practice, MH and community services before we hand back all our influence/control.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In my area of the country the agenda is set by CCG NHSE,the Local Area Team,the CCG managment.The GPs are way at the bottom of the food chain.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say