This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

GPs asked to help trusts cut long hospital stays by 25% before winter

NHS England has told GPs to help hospitals to reduce the number of patients who stay too long in hospital by a quarter.

Hospitals will be told they must reduce lengthy stays of hospital patients, especially those who are elderly and frail, by 25% before winter or face disciplinary measures.

Speaking at the annual NHS Confederation conference in Manchester, Simon Stevens and Ian Dalton, the chief executives of NHS England and NHS Improvement, will set out the plans which will they say will 'help to free up thousands of hospital beds and ease pressures next winter'.

But Mr Stevens said acute trusts could achieve only 'half' of the target set out by NHS England, with the rest to come from local authorities, social services and GPs.

According to NHS England, shorter stays 'will benefit patients who would otherwise be stuck in hospital when they are well enough to leave as well as freeing up beds for those who are sicker'.

It claimed many older people, especially who are frail or have dementia 'actually deteriorate while in hospital'.

NHS England said this comes as nearly 350,000 patients spend more than three weeks in hospital every year, 'many' of whom do not need to stay for medical reasons.

It aims to reduce the number of long staying patients by around a quarter, 'freeing up more than 4,000 beds in time for the winter surge'.

NHS trusts will be asked to 'close the gap' between the number of patients who are discharged during the week and at the weekend and 'make greater use of' admission alternatives such as emergency day cases.

NHS England said that hospital stays 'above the best practice guidelines' are going to be 'treated as a safety issue that urgently needs addressing with the time patients have spent on wards closely monitored through the Patient Administration System'.

Although NHS England's announcement was light on detail regarding how the target would be achieved, especially in light of dwindling social care funding, it said: 'Trusts will be supported by extended GP access and a focus on avoiding unnecessary hospital admissions including more support for care home staff to prevent residents being admitted.

'There will also be regional emergency care intensive support teams charged with helping to deliver the 25% ambition.'

And Mr Stevens told the conference: 'The fact that we have perhaps a fifth of our precious hospital beds occupied by folks who have been there for more than three weeks and are ready to go home, is an affront to patient dignity; it has consequences for our ability to admit emergency patients from A&E; and it is crowding out the ability to admit people who need routine surgery, and surgery. 

'So the top operational objective has got to be unblocking this over the course of the next year. 

'About half of that is probably in the gift of acute trusts, while half of it relies on change processes by community health services, councils, GP services. 

'So that is why for those of you who are either working in acute trusts, or community services or [as] GPs, or social care: Have a look at your own figures, see the impact that you can have, if you are able to take out a quarter of that delay and you will find that will unlock a lot the financial and operational reform that we need to deliver over the course of this year.'

Mr Dalton said: 'By setting this national ambition and working with trusts and local systems to deliver it, we will help more patients to recover safely and as quickly as possible, while ensuring that hospital resources are used for those who need them most.'

The announcement comes as last winter saw the worst-ever A&E waiting times and growing waiting lists for patients, prompting calls for urgent action by politicians and NHS leaders.

But GP leaders argued that there was no capacity in general practice to deal with the extra workload of caring for patients released earlier from hospital stays.

BMA GP Committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: 'Practices, and particularly community nursing teams, are struggling already with patients who have been discharged too early with complex problems.'

He also highlighted that evaluation to date of extended GP access 'did not show a significant impact on admissions as it is a different population that is being catered for'.

And he added: 'It's only with proper investment in general practice and community based services that we will be able to make the significant difference in the quality of care we all want to see... NHS England and the Government would be better to invest the recurrent funding for extended hours in to core day-time general practice as that is where the greatest need and demand is.'

Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland LMC medical director Dr Anu Rao said she did not think NHS England was 'joining up the dots'.

She said: 'The problem is they haven't made primary care robust enough or resourced enough to be able to absorb the kind of work that they want primary care to absorb.

'The idea is good - patients shouldn't be staying long in hospital. 'However, where patients are going to come back into the community, you need to put in resources within the community to be able to do that and that's not happening. I think it's not going to work.'

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said: 'GPs and our teams work incredibly hard in challenging circumstances to deliver as many services for our patients as possible – and it is credit to them that now more than half the population has extended access to routine GP services in one form or another. 

'However, in the drive to increase this further, and more quickly than the original target, it must be remembered that patients should already be able to access GP care when they need to through routine GP services and the GP out-of-hours service.'

According to Professor Stokes-Lampard, what is neeeded is 'better public awareness of the different services available for patients, so that they know where to turn when they become ill', and she argued that GPs must 'retain the flexibility to deliver their services in the most effective way' dependent on their patient needs.

'There is absolutely no point us using our scant resources to offer services for which there is not much patient demand, simply to meet arbitrary targets. 'With the significant workforce constraints we are currently working under, extra services can only be offered by compromising existing services – either reducing the quantity or quality of core hours offerings, or both,' she said.

 

Readers' comments (26)

  • I have to say this about the quality of idiot at NHSE.
    It is high.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Who is NHS England exactly? I would love to see a list of ages, backgrounds and pay. I had assumed that it was everyone that used to be in strategic health authorities but the only people I have met who work for it were 20 year olds straight out of university with irrelevant degrees and vague job descriptions involving drawing up ideas and telling hospitals what to do. Pay? £80,000 up. No wonder it’s all going to pot. NHS England doesn’t have a clue because actually they don’t!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is yet another GP ‘save all’ with no funds attached. So we’re meant to be in EDs across the country as well as 8-8 7 days a week and now resolving hospital bed crisis- whatever next?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Meanwhile they cut funding to GPs from 12 to 7.5 %. Do more and more for less and less.
    But then we do. More fool us.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The wording: NHSE 'has told GPs' to help.
    GPs always help, they don't have to be told. 'Telling' stinks of arrogance and high handedness from these morons who never appreciate the endless goodwill of GPs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Only 1 question for my esteemed colleague .....WHY ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say