This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs team up with hospitals to take over health budgets for 200k patients

Two areas of England are at the forefront of a revolution seeing GPs signing agreements with hospitals to jointly control integrated health and social care budgets.

Hammersmith and Fulham GP Federation has signed a partnership agreement with four trusts in the first step towards creating an ‘accountable care system’, which will see all five providers decide collectively how the local health budget should be spent.

The move comes after NHS England announced that all health and social care organisations that drew up plans in 2016 to overhaul care in England will eventually become accountable care systems (ACS).

NHS England’s Next Steps on the Five Year Forward View delivery plan has said that hospital trusts, CCGs and local authorities in the new ACSs will ‘take on clear collective responsibility for resources and population health’.

Dr John Sanfey, medical director of Hammersmith and Fulham GP Federation, said the new model of care would see GPs involved in funding discussions about primary, secondary and social care.

He said: ‘The real benefits longer term are to do with primary care and secondary care each functioning very efficiently and complementing each other so that things that are best done in primary care are done in primary care but are properly funded.’

Dr Sanfey said the budget for the population of 212,000 has yet to be finalised but could be between £200m and £300m.

He added that, while the benefits of the new model ‘have yet to materialise’ for primary care on the ground, GPs are already leading the partnership ‘in chairing roles in the important committees’. 

The partnership is aiming to sign an ‘alliance agreement’ in April before beginning ‘the serious business of how we share resources between primary, secondary and some aspects of community care’.

He said the providers are unsure they will ‘ever reach the “fully integrated” contract’ where GPs give up their national contract, but he said they aim to reach a partially integrated agreement in 2019.

GPs in Nottingham are also in talks with the four local CCGs to create a partially integrated ACS, which Nottinghamshire LMC has said will see GPs form part of the ‘governance of the accountable care system’.

Michael Wright, chief executive of the LMC, said Nottingham practices don’t ‘have the appetite’ to move away from their national contract, adding that ‘there isn’t a compelling case to move away from that at all’.

He said: ‘You might get a few who feel desperate or feel they just want to get out of a partnership and just go into a different kind of working arrangement and some of them it might appeal to but I would suspect that the overwhelming majority will want to hold on to their own contract.’

Pulse has previously reported that GP practices that decide to leave a ‘fully integrated’ accountable care contract could be forced to give up their patients.

The BMA has previously warned GPs ‘not to feel pressured’ to sign these contracts, with GPC contracts and regulations lead Dr Robert Morley adding ‘wholly inadvisable’ to suspend a GMS or PMS contract.

However Mr Wright added that the plans are still in the early stages with the LMC in talks with practices over how the ACS can best benefit GPs.

He said: ‘The intention is that, to really make an ACS work, then general practice, being such a crucial part of the system, has to tick some of the boxes that at the moment aren’t being ticked for general practice.’

NHS England’s move towards ‘accountable care’ 

Simon Stevens first announced that ‘sustainability and transformation partnerships’ would receive ‘governance rights’ in February last year at the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).

NHS England then announced nine ‘likely candidates’ to become the first ACSs, including Nottinghamshire and Manchester.

The ACS in Manchester, which saw GPs invited to bid for a £6bn contract to oversee all non-acute care, has meant GPs are able to hire paramedics to take on nearly all home visits, freeing up time for GPs to offer half-hour appointments.

However, other areas have also announced plans to form ACSs including Portsmouth and Leicestershire, where GPs criticised the plan for containing ‘no detail’ on GP involvement.

Readers' comments (10)

  • Carrilion like planning from the establishment, federate/conglomerate. not to big to fail.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • MyBad

    This is the US model for totally crap healthcare provision. Jeremy Hunt visited a while back and was really impressed. Supermassive centralised organisation...an administrators wet dream. Decisions removed as far away as possible from the people seeing patients. Obviously shit ...so will be made compulsory (on a voluntary basis obviously )

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ACS = GP to do more work with less money that goes to the trusts for them to waste whilst they do less work for more money...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    I recall the Trilemma Theory:
    Integration
    Sovereignty
    Democracy
    You can only have two out of these three , never all three together.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    You see
    The way it goes , the government will eventually say OOH GP service is too unsafe to carry on . With the ‘evolution’ of integration into Accountable Care Services (ACS) run by Accountable Care Organisations (ACOs). There will be eventually no such things called in hours or out of hours.
    Primary care and GP will be 24/7 Services as there was no such thing called out of hour secondary care services previously.
    How are ACOs funded or ‘adequately’ funded is another matter. This government and its health secretary are really not interested.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Unfortunately, in England you can have ACS and ACOS - what's missing is the Accountable person when sh*** hits the fan in any walk of life. It's only lessons have been learned and an Inquiry will be held -ie more money will be spent on the next unaccountable bodies or people.
    Note, the organisers are mainly LMC and CCG officials who are working maybe 1-3 sessions a week or not at all. They'll certainly slave drive the rest who join in that hurraoptimism.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The budget for Fulham is 2-300 million. That’s a 100 million difference.

    They are agreeing to integrate but don’t really k ow what their budget is!!!

    GPs need to be careful and not give up theirs gms or pms contract. It is a contract in perpetuity and we should not be sucked into losing this

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctor McDoctor Face

    Their working lives, conditions and salaries will be determined by a 23 year old manager with a degree in woodwork and healthcare

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • Just Your Average Joe

    'Dr Sanfey said the budget for the population of 212,000 has yet to be finalised but could be between £200m and £300m.'

    GP712 stole my thunder!

    the difference between 200 and 300 million is a whopping increase of 50% of the original budget.

    If the NHS had 50% of the original budget - the NHS managers would be awarding themselves pay packets like the bust Carillion. No wait they do that already!

    Seriously they ridiculous range of financing could make something work really well if baseline cost 250 million with 50 million being used innovatively to improve care (with 300 total), or if baseline cost 250 million, and only 200 million budget, would mean overspend and deficit of 50 million, and sacking of all involved.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Some people will do anything to get out of actually seeing patients

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say