This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Health secretary wants LESs to take forward GP 'one-stop shop' plans

Exclusive Health secretary Jeremy Hunt wants GP practices to be incentivised to become 'one-stop shops' for specialist outpatient services via local enhanced services, Pulse has learned.

The ‘one stop’ proposals, first floated by Mr Hunt in October, focus on long-term conditions management predominantly delivered in hospital outpatient settings, such as diabetes, renal and cardiology.

In a recent interview with Pulse, junior health minister David Mowat MP told Pulse that the national GP contract could be 'a mechanism for GPs to be reimbursed' for taking on specialist outpatients services.

But, asked by Pulse if this meant a new national Directed Enhanced Service (DES) was being proposed, a Department of Health spokesperson said: ‘[The] Secretary of state is thinking about local enhanced services, not a national scheme.’

And NHS England confirmed that it had 'no plans' for a new national DES on one-stop shops.

Meanwhile, GP leaders told Pulse that they have not come across any fleshed out proposal for the scheme at all, adding that at the moment it was just a 'political statement'.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said: 'It’s not something I’ve come across as a proposal, no. To me it’s a political statement and nothing more'.

NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens has previously told Pulse that GPs could be taking a lead role in managing ‘all of the -ologies’ from diabetes to cardiology.

DH and NHS England are hoping that some of the budget spent on outpatients - currently at the same level as general practice is its entirety - can be transferred to general practice as part of their Five Year Forward View strategy of moving services closer to patients' homes and reduce the cost of secondary care.

A Pulse analysis of how one-stop shops were already working found models in Hampshire, where respiratory specialists are being invited to Saturday clinics at GP practices and drastically reduced emergency admissions.

Meanwhile, a scheme in Tower Hamlets in East London, where NHS England vanguard lead Sir Sam Everington is CCG chair, sees GPs able to email renal consultants directly, and in many cases avoid a referral altogether.

But in Pulse's interview with Mr Mowat, the minister said GPs would not be able to become one-stop shops without a significant upgrade to GP premises.

More work for GPs?

Mr Hunt's new ambition for GP practices to run outpatient clinics come as NHS England is in the process of developing a new voluntary GP contract for large-scale multidisciplinary GP practices with 30,000 or more patients, which aims for practices to employ a wider range of healthcare staff.

But it also comes as the GPC has been successful in convincing NHS leaders to amend hospital contracts to stop ‘workload dump’ from secondary care colleagues, amid unprecedented pressure on GP practices.

When first commenting on the plans, the GPC highlighted that many GP practices already do this - for example by caring for the vast majority of their diabetic patients. It further warned tha tthis workload shift tended to not be matched and supported by shifted resources.

Announcing his plan in October last year, Mr Hunt said that under his ‘GP one-stop programme’, the NHS will be going through ‘condition by condition’ to see which can be handled in general practice rather than secondary care going forward.

He admitted that this meant asking GPs to ‘do more work’ but said that they would be ‘paid for doing that’ and argued that it would also ‘make life more rewarding for doctors’.



Readers' comments (16)

  • National Hopeless Service

    Gosh, lets try this and we could call holding. There must be longevity to something called fund holding surely?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's all about saving money. Nothing else.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fundholding was stopped too early. From the practice perspective it had a lot going for it. The big unanswered question is whether given time fundholding would have led to a major cost effective reorganisation of the landscape. I think it would have.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • LES = loads extra shite??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Same old Same old

    Luckily for me I am old enough to get out before it becomes really 5H1t...

    Feel really sorry for any fool mad enough to embark on this a career for the next 25 yrs like I did

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Last time I tried to set up a one stop service in my rural practice I was told by local managers "it is too inefficient" and " why can"t they travel to hospital" there is no joined up thinking in this mess.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is always this cycle of centralisation/decentralisation. When things are centralised such as in a hospital the thinking goes this hospital is expensive to run why don't we ship everything out to the community where it must be cheaper- major reorganisation occurs- after a few years the thinking goes - its expensive having all these small different places to run surely it will be cheaper if we amalgamate all of them into one place such as a hospital. Round and round we go- you can also see this process at work in GP Training Recruitment. the ultra centralisation of the national recruitment process is starting to fray at the edges. Tedious.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    GPs 'ideally placed' to do "One Stop Shop".

    As if we're not busting a gut already.

    Wise up please SoS. Your ship is sinking. No point in standing there mouthing off like the Boy on the Burning Deck. Mind you what happened to him would be an ideal punishment for you. (Rude version involving crackers)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Shows JH doesn't understand primary care - or in fact any business.

    Who in their right mind take on £1m/year commitment of property and staff liabilities when we have to operate under fully liable partnership (unless APMS). You would of course have to surrender your GMS contract to become APMS with max of 10 year contract. Even as APMS, there would have to be sufficient incentives for me to do this - why would I want to manage multi-million pound contract and be paid less then an average hospital consultant who is an employee! If I can successfully do this, I suspect my talent would be better as an exec in a private firm (with wages of £250k+/annum).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It'll be just like fund holding -without any funds.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say