This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPC brands Government’s new GP contract ‘a distraction’

The Government’s new alternative GP contract is ‘a distraction’ from the problems it should urgently be solving within general practice, the GPC has said.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul told Pulse that the announcement is ‘sidestepping reality’ and that the Government should be focusing on relieving GPs’ stress.

Prime Minister David Cameron announced yesterday that the Government will launch a new voluntary GP contract available to large practices and federations with more than 30,000 patients which would ‘get rid of’ box-ticking and offer seven-day access.

But citing the Department of Health-commissioned GP Worklife Survey published last week and the BMA’s survey of over 15,000 GPs earlier this year, Dr Nagpaul said the Government’s priority should be to tackle the issues of GP stress levels being at record highs, nine in 10 GPs under too much pressure to give quality care and a third planning to retire within five years.

He said the Government ‘should be very concerned’ about the ‘stark’ statistics, and ’should want to be doing what it can to address the reality of patient services being so adversely affected under current pressures’.

Dr Nagpaul said: ‘This announcement is simply sidestepping the reality and priority that the Government should be concerned about. The issue is about tackling immediate priorities facing the profession. Last week a Government survey showed there are record levels of stress [and] our BMA survey showed that one-third of GPs are considering retiring from general practice within the next five years.

‘As a Government, if that is the reality that is facing you, you have to ensure that quality of care and services are maintained. That is where the dialogue has to come back to, to today’s reality and tackling the problems that are affecting the GP service.’

Professor Clare Gerada, a GP in Lewisham and the former chair of RCGP told Pulse: ’I think it is destabilising an already very precarious situation. We need to be focusing on the sick and continuity, not spreading ourselves thinner and thinner for the needs of convenience.’

Family Doctor Association chair Dr Peter Swinyard said the Government’s announcement was a way to ‘divide and rule’ GPs, adding: ’To announce before any negotiation is a disgrace.’

But NHS Alliance chair Dr Michael Dixon said that the new contract ’could be useful and interesting if people and resources follow it’.

Readers' comments (6)

  • What new contract - Dave and Jezzabelle dont seem to have had the same conversation. No wonder even damp Dan Poulter has been scathing of Jezzabelle in the Guardian.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's good to see the likes of Dr Dixon and Dr Bennett who look to the future of NHS with great optimism and enthusiasm - There's a rainbow behind every cloud they say and while majority of GPs see dark clouds and a storm brewing, they see only rainbows and clear skies. Hats off to them for keeping us in good spirits.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Dr Nagpaul said the Government’s priority should be to tackle the issues of GP stress levels being at record highs"

    How will they then push primary care over the edge? Their buddies are waiting in the shadows rubbing their hand together for the bargain of the millennium!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • So let me get this right - GPC, which I understand has the statutory right to have consultation with the government on GP contracts have been completely bypassed and a new "contract placed on the table without their knowledge what so ever.

    And the best response from Dr Nagpaul, recipient of the government honors and current chair of the GPC is "its a distraction"?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • GPC , what GPC. Oh, you mean the Govt. Policing Conglomerate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • where is a copy of this contract so I can read it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say