This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

The waiting game

GP practices no longer able to remove certain violent patients from list

A change to the GP contract means that practices will no longer be able to remove certain violent patients from their list.

Following a change to the 2018/19 GP contract, practices have been able to refuse to register patients if they have been flagged by other practices as violent. They can also remove ‘mistakenly registered’ violent patients under normal procedures.

But the updated contact for 2020/21 clarifies patients who have previously been flagged as violent cannot be removed from lists if they are being reintegrated back into primary care after having been placed in the 'special allocation scheme'.

Patients are placed in the scheme if they have been removed from a practice list following an incident that was reported to the police.

However, the new rules, being brought in from October, mean if a patient has been discharged from the scheme, a practice cannot remove them from their list on the basis of the previous violent incident.

In the new contract, agreed between the BMA GP Committee and NHS England last week, it states: 'From October 2020, an existing requirement in the GMS regulations relating to the removal of patients who are violent from the practice list will be updated.

'The regulations currently enable a contractor to remove a patient from their list if they become aware the patient has previously been removed from another GP practice list for committing or threatening an act of violence.'

It added: 'The change will clarify that patients should not be removed from the GP practice list if, having been previously removed from a GP practice list and entered into a special allocation scheme for violent patients, they have subsequently been discharged for reintegration into mainstream primary care.'

There have been a spate of aggressive episodes directed towards healthcare professionals lately, including a stabbing at an east London practice that led to four people being hospitalised, and a patient's arrest following an alleged knife attack on a GP during a consultation in Stoke

Last year, a survey of around 400 doctors revealed that over three quarters have been assaulted or threatened by a patient or a relative while practising.

A survey by Pulse publisher Cogora in 2017 revealed that two thirds of GPs had experienced some form of abuse from patients.

Readers' comments (6)

  • As NHS and PCSE wilfully misinterprets the regulations anyway this doesn’t apply to many cases as they refuse to put dangerous patients in the violent patients scheme to start with!

    The ‘zero tolerance’ slogan is a bad joke.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So much for zero tolerance. The BMA is getting worse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We have the RIGHT to refuse to see dangerous people if the proper safeguards are not in place. end of. when we all refuse to see them then something will get done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Boris' 4% increase comes with a baseball club:))

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I suppose it's fair : IF, having been fully informed, you accept one of these, you only de-list for a new offence: BUT you never have to accept them in the first place, and if you are misled, you cab delist them. That's ok, though I would also persue a civil case against the misleading Health Authority staff member!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So wait till they re -offend and if you're still alive after you can re-register and the next practice has to accept them?So much for safeguarding us and zero tolerance

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say