This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

A faulty production line

BMA calls for practices to work together to extend GP access in blueprint on future of general practice

The BMA has proposed that networks of practices work together to offer extended access and more alternatives to face-to-face consultations, in its vision for the future of general practice published today.

The major policy paper calls for a radical shift in the resourcing of general practice, and backs the ‘named clinician’ idea promoted by the health secretary for all patients with long-term and complex needs.

It also calls for an extension of GP training to five years and a 10-year rolling programme to ensure all GP practices that require it have a ‘purpose-built surgery’.

The Developing General Practice: Providing Healthcare Solutions for the Future policy paper details the BMA’s argument for greater resources to be given to GPs in order to ease the ‘severe pressure’ practices find themselves under and gives a list of suggestions on the way forward.

It suggests that the arrangements under the extended access DES should become more flexible, so that networks of practices can work together to offer surgeries at different times.

The document says that ‘collaborating with other practices to provide extended hours surgeries at a range of different times across a community’ would enable this to happen.

It also suggests that GPs should offer ‘more alternatives to a face-to-face consultation when clinically appropriate, such as dedicated telephone and/or Skype surgeries’.

It comes after NHS England included extending GP access in its ‘call to action’ consultation on primary care and after the Government announced it would trial groups of practices opening from 8am to 8pm on weekdays and also opening at weekends.

The document also says that all patients with long-term and complex needs should be ‘jointly managed through an integrated team in line with a single care plan led by the most appropriate named clinician’. This echoes the plans set out by health secretary Jeremy Hunt, which will see individual clinicians - most likely GPs - overseeing the whole care provided to vulnerable elderly patient.

Pulse revealed last week that the GPC is set to agree to the named clinician plans in exchange for a removal of the bureaucratic elements of the QOF. The document sets out the GPC’s support for such plans, despite the opposition of many in the GP profession.

The BMA document states: ‘Patients with long-term and complex needs should be jointly managed through an integrated team in line with a single care plan led by the most appropriate named clinician. This would require a much greater alignment of incentives and funding streams between general practices and hospital and community service providers.’

To improve the recruitment and retention of GPs, it suggest ‘lengthening GP training to a fully-funded five years with a much greater proportion of time training based in general practice’.

The GPC urges improvements to urgent and out-of-hours primary care services, including a clinician-led first point of contact and the removal of the ‘compulsion’ for competitive tendering for out-of-hours care.

There should be greater sharing of GP records across the NHS, long-term incentives to expand GP partnerships and initiatives to support GP returners back to work in order to solve the current shortage of GPs.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said: ‘Our vision for general practice is a bold plan to address both the immediate pressures facing GPs and develop a long term strategy for patient care by improving coordination, integration and quality.’

‘We need to look at new ways of working that can help GPs play a central role in delivering care that is more efficient and responsive to the needs of patients who increasingly need services that are more personalised and closer to home.’

‘To make these ideas a reality general practice needs greater investment to enable an expansion of the GP workforce and to fund new and innovative ways of working. We must end the uncertainty about future funding which is holding back GPs from meeting short term challenges and setting long term goals that could be a solution to alleviate some of the pressure on the NHS as a whole.’

But Dr Peter Swinyard, chair of the Family Doctor Association, said that the extended access proposals would not prove popular among many GPs.

He said: ‘I know that the change will not be welcomed by many of my colleagues, and I think some people will say it’s a sell out and that it’s the Government agenda just being parroted by the BMA.

‘[But] things have become so tight in general practice at the moment that, especially smaller practices, are just not going to survive without working together with other people. It just isn’t viable anymore, and we have to start thinking differently about how we’re going to organise ourselves.’

Dr Grant Ingrams, a GP in Coventry, said that the extended access plans would harm the core role of general practice to provide continuity of care.

He said: ‘The evidence from this country, from studies elsewhere, is that what gives you the best healthcare is seeing a doctor you know. And you cannot do that, if I’m in a rota twenty other doctors, or sixty other doctors or whatever, you lose that.’

This article was altered on 07/11/13 at 22:22 to remove the suggestion that the BMA backed the health secretary’s call to extend GP hours.

Readers' comments (42)

  • ?GP coops come back,is there the good will to do them

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lets roll over and have our tummies tickled.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This seems like a pretty significant change to out T+Cs.

    Why hasn't the membership been consulted on this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where exactly are the experienced GPs that greater investment will enable expansion of the GP workforce at this moment?
    Seriously, where the hell are they and what is being done to stop the migration of those like me.
    Prove to me that this isn't all pie in the sky. .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Membership cancelled.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Membership cancelled also

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I cancelled my membership after the BMA's non-handling of our pensions dispute.

    Seriously... there are better ways to spend nearly £500 every year than on dysfunctional union membership!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It must be extremely satisfying for Mr Hunt as he watches th BMA doing his work and attracting tory votes at the same time! I vowed I would stick with the BMA until retirement but I feel this may bre too far even for me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Membership cancelled after 20+ years. BMA has been a disappointment at reflecting grass root GPs. I see no end to the incessant work load and demands. Exit strategy plan continuing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous 11:43 - I think you're very optimistic. I think we're about to be rolled over and have our prostates tickled!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The BMA will be remembered for the way it allowed General Practice to be destroyed in the early 21st century.

    Thanks god I am 57 and not 37.
    Emigrate now if you can.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • More fund could be available to recruitment more GPs to provide high quality care if we choose carefully from the options below. It is a political decision. Responsibility is now being passed to GPs (again passing the buck) quite inappropriately, simply because our politicians do not have guts to tell the truth to the public!
    We need to have a mature debate about NHS funding and chose carefully -

    Plan A : If you want all inclusive NHS (i.e. IVF, Botox, Acupuncture, Bariatric surgery for all, Keloid removal etc) then we all need to pay in more tax to fund this all inclusive service!

    Plan B: Basic/ Essential package i.e. life saving procedure, elderly care, maternity and children service etc then there is a chance that the current funding may work if we plan ahead and emphasise on cost-effectiveness. We need to have a national guidance not a post code lottery.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bye bye General Practice xxx

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'Led a merry dance to the Piper's tune' to mix one's idioms...

    Abandon hope all ye who enter here!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hope the bma will be prepared for a drop in income

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If this is the BMA start of negotiations I despair!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There's very little the BMA can do anyway.They showed how effective they are when they organised the pensions strike .Most of the GPs in the political/CCG posts are feathering their own nests anyway.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tom Caldwell

    BMA who are you representing? From where we are looking it seems to be the Government. We pay you to represent us, we pay you a lot to represent us, you unfailingly let us down. The net result here is Hunt gets his blamed clinician, Hunt gets more hours for free, Hunt gets all the information he could ever want to give to his backers in private healthcare, QOF changes will mean money is lost and and then "given back" for something unachievable, GPs get told do more for less and there is no money for new buildings. BMA hang your heads in shame and resign.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • BMA membership cancelled

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • /again not listening to grassroots membership cancelled

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say