This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

RCGP vows to take action on MRCGP failure rates after High Court ruling

The RCGP has said it will take further action to support trainees who fail the MRCGP exam, after a High Court judge said ‘the time has come to act’ on differentials in the pass rates between white and non-white candidates.

The Mr Justice Mitting found in favour of the RCGP, adding that the clinical skills assessment was a ‘proportional’ way of deciding who can practise as a GP, despite differences between the pass rates of white and non-white medical graduates.

The claims against the RCGP and the GMC were wholly dismissed, but BAPIO has said it is considering appealing the verdict.

However, the court did says that ‘the time has come’ for the RCGP to address the differentials in the pass rates.

He said that the claim – made by the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin – was made in ‘good faith by an organisation acting in the best interests of the public’, adding that BAPIO had ‘achieved, if not a legal success, then a moral success’.

The court did find that the RCGP had a duty to carry out an equality assessment under the Public Sector Equality Duty, but was satisfied that the 18 reviews of the exam that have been undertaken so far have achieved this aim.

He said the reviews showed ‘unavoidable unconscious bias’ due to the nature of the assessment, and that some of the significant differences in pass rates between racial groups could be put down to education and cultural differences.

However, the judge added that the college must now act upon the recommendations of the various reviews, and added that any failure to do so would leave it open to a future legal challenge.

He ruled: ‘The college needs to act to eliminate discrimination and has identified some of the means by which that need might be addressed and fulfilled.’

‘If it does not act, and its failure to act is the subject of a further challenge, it may well be held to have breached its duty.’

RCGP chair Dr Maureen Baker said: ‘We hope that today’s judgment means we can now draw a line under the events of the past year and concentrate on delivering a robust and fair exam for future generations of GPs and for the benefit of our patients.’

She added that they agreed with Mr Mitting’s comments: ‘We agree that further action is needed, and we are already working hard to find the best way of supporting the small number of trainees who fail to pass the CSA component of the MRCGP licensing exam to give them every chance of passing the exam.’

‘We are already developing further web-based learning resources and publications to help trainees and their trainers prepare for the exam and are reviewing how to improve the quality of feedback that candidates receive from the exam so that they can target any areas of underperformance with their trainer.’

‘We are also committed to acting on recommendations made in recent reviews to ensure the MRCGP minimises any possible risks of unfairness and we are very keen to work with the GP training community to develop effective training strategies for those who might struggle with the exam.’

Niall Dickson, chief executive of the GMC, said: ‘We do understand that there are serious and complex issues at play here. International medical graduates have made a huge contribution to healthcare in this country and we will continue to do whatever we can to support these doctors who provide so much frontline care in the UK.’ 

Dr Ramesh Metha, president of BAPIO, said the result was ‘disappointing’, but there were positive elements for BAPIO.

He said: ‘We need to think about what our priorities are… We will be seeking a meeting with the college to see how we can move forward from here.’

‘We have to do what is good for the medical profession and the public, and we need to work together to find a solution to a problem - everyone has accepted there is a problem.’

He added BAPIO is considering an appeal.

Related images

  • RCGP - RCGP sign - RCGP house - online

Readers' comments (83)

  • How much did that vague outcome cost both parties?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Was anyone realistically expecting anything different?
    I was NOT

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It didn't cost the two parties anything. We, the members, have paid for it!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Mustapha Tahir

    I totally agree with Chair of the RCGP Dr Baker. Time to draw a line and move forward. The college has amassed a lot of recommendations to address the issues. It's time for things to change for the better for all parties involved in this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes, indeed it has cost both RCGP and BAPIO a lot of money, but its also started the ball rolling to help make the MRCGP the fairest post-graduate exam of all the Royal Colleges. We are not there yet and there is lots of work to do. I am certain the work will continue and the other Royal Colleges follow suit by placing their postgraduate exams under a similar level of scrutiny and transparency.

    If that happens, it will be money well spent.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Transparency??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is disgraceful that the BAPIO cried racism when it should have been addressing the inadequacies of some of it's members who were unable to pass the exam. I hope they have to pay the costs of the RCGP and the GMC, otherwise it will be the rest of us paying.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does BAPIO have a right of appeal? I suspect this is not the end of it. Don't count your chickens yet RCGP.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • I think the BAPIO should be paying the costs of the RGCP/ GMC etc - I think it is unfair to ask the GMC/ RCGP members to fund this process.

    Furthermore I think the BAPIO should be using their vast resources to actually improve things for their members, rather than trying to do something in the public eye to boost it's own profile.

    Time for the BAPIO to think about providing direct education to it's members - organising education events that are focussed on the needs of it's ethnic mix (therefore cannot be provided fairly by an organisation that has to focus equally on all ethnic groups).

    They should be looking to narrow the gap by improving the education of it's members rather than trying to get free bonus marks for it's members so more of them pass.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is an exam that will not be accepted in any other developed country due to lack of objectivity and transparency. Most GP trainees irrespective of colour/race will agree with me on this point.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say