This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

'Elite' university students shun general practice

Medical graduates from the top-ranked ‘elite’ universities are avoiding general practice, with fewer than one in six University of Oxford medical graduates applying to become GPs, official data has shown.

Data released by the GMC reveal that only 16% of Oxford graduates choose to enter general practice, followed by St George’s Hospital Medical School with 19%, the University of Edinburgh at 22% and the universities of Bristol and Cambridge with 25%.

The GMC analysed graduates over three years, from 2012 to 2014, and their figures are a blow for the Government’s target of 50% of medical graduates entering general practice by this year, and follow disappointing results from the first round of GP training recruitment, which showed that one-third of places remained unfilled.

They also follow a series of rows between GP leaders and medical school deans, who have been accused of telling undergraduates that general practice is a ‘second-class’ career option, while the RCGP has met with medical school leaders to discuss a ‘toxic anti-GP’ culture.

GP leaders have said that the figures are ‘distressing’, and it is up to universities like Oxford to put more of a focus on promoting general practice.

The figures revealed that not a single university saw 50% of its medical graduates apply to become GPs.

University of Leicester medical students were most likely to want to become GPs, with close to half (45%) of its medical students applying to train as GPs, followed by Keele University (44%), then the University of East Anglia (43%).

The number who went onto be offered a place and accepting it was lower, including 28% for students from Leicester and East Anglia, 24% for Keele, 11% for Oxford and 14% for Cambridge.

But Professor Azeem Majeed, professor of primary care at Imperial College London, which saw just over a quarter (27%) of its medical students apply to GP training in the first intake, said medical schools were not to blame for poor GP recruitment generally.

He said: ‘I think [variations between medical schools] has always been the case and I think people who blame medical schools for problems with GP recruitment are probably attacking the wrong target.’

He added that it was more likely that it is ‘the job itself that is the problem’, with increased workloads at a time when income was falling.

However, he said that his own institution had stepped up its game in a bid to promote the profession recently, including hiring more GP lecturers.

GPC education and training subcommittee chair Dr Krishna Kasaraneni said that the newer medical schools, such as Keele and East Anglia, tended to put more emphasis on general practice, and more focus was needed on ‘medical schools like Oxford where less than 20% of their graduates end up being GPs’.

He added: ‘It is not about educating doctors who are more suited to general practice than other specialities but it is about ensuring that they have balanced exposure to general practice as well as other hospital specialities so that they can make an informed decision about their future careers.’

But he added that Government targets for 50% of medical students to choose general practice was completely unrealistic.

Dr Kasaraneni said: ‘None of these universities have hit that target, not a single one. So when politicians are making these pre-election pledges they need to realise they are promising what no medical school has ever delivered.’

A spokesperson for the The Medical Schools Council said that it ‘recognises the need for a workforce which reflects society’s current requirements - and the difficulty of responding quickly to urgent needs in particular specialties’.

They added: ‘MSC fully supports the recommendations in both the Tooke Report and the Shape of Training Review that there should be broad based core training before later specialisation as required.’

Dr Maureen Baker, chair of the RCGP, said: ‘It is disappointing and distressing to see the huge differences in medical students taking up general practice depending on which university they attend. All medical schools have a duty to promote the opportunities and challenges of a career as a GP.’

Dr Tim Lancaster, director of clinical studies at the University of Oxford, who is also a GP, said: ‘We do not agree that it is undesirable that there is variation between schools in the proportion of graduates entering different career paths. Oxford unashamedly selects students who have the potential to benefit from a course which places strong emphasis on the understanding of biomedical research.’

 

Pulse GP Jobs

Readers' comments (40)

  • constantly undermining GPs, the media and MPs denigrate GPS all the time, soon they will realise the NHS will collapse without them, the consultants in the hospital will no longer have anyone else to dump on, the will have increased work loads to breaking point. I can see a knee surgeon having a clue about managing diabetes and mental ill health all in the same session, a knee surgeon only has to know about a knee , a GP needs to know something about everything in 10 minutes

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is this surprising?
    Nobody applies to oxbridge unless they believe they are exceptional.
    Why would anyone with this opinion about themselves apply to a speciality where they are guaranteed a training place, hardly an elite specialty when so many training places are left empty.
    After they become a consultant in general practice the standard salary is £20,000 less than their hospital equivalents, with no excellence awards to top up. Confirmation in pounds shillings and pence that the BMA or government doesn't rate their value the equivalent of their hospital colleagues.
    Of course this is on top of the daily verbal abuse they hear at the expense of general practice during their time in hospital.
    I'm surprised they had anyone taking up the speciality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can't blame them. If they are smart enough to get into an "elite" university then they're smart enough not to go into the travesty that is now general practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a Cambridge student I was at times openly laughed at by my student colleagues for wanting to do general practice. My teachers were equally puzzled, 'But you got a 2:1, why would you waste your life as a GP?' As a PRHO in general practice, I learned a lot more from some incredibly inspiring GP colleagues in that 4 months than I learnt as a PRHO in surgery or medicine. It has been possible to satisfy the Cambridge part of my brain in general practice until the last 5 years, when the job has become impossible. It was the Cambridge 'think for yourself and make up your own mind' education that has enabled me to plot an escape from partnership. General Practice is dying. I loved it but it has nearly killed me and I will be glad to leave it behind. Students are far more savvy than HEE and RCGP give them credit for, and they can read and think for themselves. Only a fool would train as a GP in 2015.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As another Cambridge graduate GP I would consider myself one of the fools that failed to take up the milk round offers for the city or law. Might not have enjoyed it as much but certainly would not be working in my late 40s as I am now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The elephant in the room is parochialism: you are more likely to receive a training position and a consultancy if you attend an "elite" medical school than if you don't. The students know this, they are anything but stupid. They are realistic and will favour the career option they will most likely accomplish.
    P.S. "elite" medical school graduate for what it is worth

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does it not seem strange that a Consultant has at least 15 minutes and on some occasions an hour or more (Psychiatry) per consultation for one issue when a GP has 10 minutes for multiple issues, forms, QoF, and at the end of the consultation... by the way my daughter has this lump...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    The only doctors I've ever met who seem interested in which medical school other people went to, are usually London Graduates for some reason.

    To the rest of us, the concept that some schools are 'elite' is anathema. We all know, from the experience of having 200 class mates in the year, that 'success' is a function of attitude and drive rather than A-Level results.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Highly informative. Who would have thought Oxford has a proper medical school these days?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Deaneries should restrict the number of non-GP jobs available. Medical students can only choose not to be a GP if other options exist. The need of the country must come first in a crisis like this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say