This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

How the GP Forward View has split opinion

Dr Chaand Nagpaul - Power 50 2015

'NHS England have committed to investment which will reverse the unacceptable decline in general practice funding. This is a vital step as the proportion of resource in general practice will reach 11% of the NHS budget and beyond. We see this as a floor, not a ceiling, and believe that NHS England must ensure that resources follow where care is being provided going forward.

'It is vital that GPs and staff see tangible delivery against these commitments, so that the words are translated into action. GP practices must receive the immediate and urgent support needed, as well as the infrastructure for a sustainable future, which will attract younger doctors to become GPs, and enable existing GPs to remain working.

Dr Chaand Nagpaul, GPC chair



Dr Maureen baker - online

'Today’s announcement is a huge and important step in the right direction, and if implemented correctly, our profession, the wider NHS, and most importantly, our patients will reap the benefits.

'Crucially, it will send a loud and clear message to those about to embark on a career in general practice, and medical students considering it, that their future as a GP will be attractive and secure.'

Dr Maureen Baker, RCGP chair

Professor Steve Field 300x300

 

'We know that GPs are under increasing pressure with limited resources, increasing patient demand and a rapidly evolving health and care landscape and so, I am pleased this report sets out the increased support and further investment that they need to do their jobs well and to make sure their patients get the care they deserve.

'We look forward to playing our part in delivering the Forward View as we continue our plans to build on the regulatory model we introduced for general practices over eighteen months ago.'

Professor Steve Field, CQC chief inspector of general practice

 

Michelle Drage 300x300

'Today’s announcement falls far short of what is needed to address the challenges facing general practice in the Capital and beyond. GPs are in a state of emergency. Patients risk losing their GPs unless pressures on general practice are dramatically eased.

'General practice is at breaking point. That’s not safe for patients or staff.'

Dr Michelle Drage, chief executive Londonwide LMCs

 

Robert Morley 300x300

'Whilst it’s good news that the severity of the parlous state of general practice has belatedly been recognised and that all additional investment and many of the specific measures heralded in the document are to be welcomed, the increased funding announced here is still far too little, too late to resolve the catastrophic workload and workforce crisis facing the profession.'

Dr Robert Morley, GPC contracts and regulation subcommittee chair 

 

Clare Gerada 300x300

Clare Gerada 300x300

I’ve always said general practice goes in a twenty year cycle, and those twenty years are grim until something happens. I think this is the something, as long as the CCGs don’t steal it.

Professor Clare Gerada, former chair, RCGP

 

chris hewitt 2 online

chris hewitt 2 online

I believe that [this] could accelerate the demise of general practice as we know it. General practice needs a clear vision - we need a rescue package that clearly outlines pounds per patient and per patient contact for the core work of GPs.

Dr Chris Hewitt, Leicestershire LMC chief executive

 

Peter Swinyard 300x300

Peter Swinyard 300x300

As someone who is a fully paid up cynic about everything government tries to do to us, and the disasters that have met general practice in the last two or three years, this at least could be a turning point. We might look back and say ‘that was the first bit that started rebuilding general practice’. I hope I’m right.

Dr Peter Swinyard, chair, Family Doctor Association

 

Stephanie De Giorgio 300x300

Stephanie De Giorgio 300x300

I’m disappointed that the RCGP is in favour of the package – they were involved in helping create it and some of the work here is good but overall, it is not a rescue plan. It’s like putting a teeny round plaster on an exsanguinating patient.

Dr Stephanie DeGiorgio, co-founder of Resilient GP

 

Dr Nav Chana  Paul Stuart

Dr Nav Chana Paul Stuart

'Primary care organised around general practice has a pivotal role to play but it must be transformed to face challenges. We encourage this transformation to recognise the wider primary care workforce to support general practice to meet the health and social care needs of its population.'

Dr Nav Chana, chair of the National Association of Primary Care 

 

Zoe Norris 300x300

Zoe Norris 300x300

'To access the funding that has been announced, practices will have to jump through a lot of hoops and sign up to providing 7 day care. We are not being trusted to be given core funding'

Dr Zoe Norris, media lead, GP Survival


2016 road map click back banner 580x60px

Rate this article  (1.29 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (23)

  • Mostly drivel. Liked Michelle Drage's and Robert Moreley's comments. Also the briefest.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • IF I can be shown the evidence that large scale working produces better outcomes, better pay/recruitment, increases satisfaction, lowers admissions etc. then I am all for it. Locally it looks as though we are going to be scrambling around for resources linked to federating/7 day access whether this will work or not. I guess ,like out of hours ,the true benefit of traditional practice will only be noticed when it is gone.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The' forward view of general practice' is that it will be GP-led rather than GP-delivered and like the nursing profession, senior clinicians will relinquish their hard earned, decisive and efficient clinical skills to an army of telephonists, computer programs and fast tracked 'clinicians' and become managers, CCGcommissioners, appraisers and CQC Inspectors. The out of hours services have already piloted this model and it is blatantly inefficient, expensive and unsustainable.. This is not a forward view that gets my support, as a future patient, rather than a future doctor.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say