This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Junior doctor contract deal could see trainees '£18,000 worse off'

The Doctors’ Association has refused to endorse the junior doctor contract deal agreed by the BMA and the Government, warning that some members could be £18,000 worse off as a result.

The grassroots lobbying group said whilst it has reviewed the framework agreement and are grateful for the efforts made by BMA negotiators with NHS Employers, it does not believe the proposed revisions to the rejected 2016 contract will be advantageous to junior doctors.

The Doctors Association said the changes to the contract ‘appear to largely undermine’ junior doctors and it is ‘appalled’ at the below-inflation 2% annual pay rise.

The 2% pay rise refers to the BMA proposals to guarantee an annual 2% increase in pay over the next four years.

The Association said: 'We are appalled that a meagre, below-inflation 2% uplift is being presented as a pay rise, when it is likely to be an almost guaranteed pay cut.'

According to the group, senior registrars will be disproportionately disadvantaged and could be up to £18,000 worse off from the loss of pension contributions and could lead to a worsening of the retention crisis.

It said: ‘Alarmingly, DAUK have identified a key cohort of junior doctors who will be significantly disadvantaged yet again by this deal. It appears our registrars, who were most affected when the contract was imposed on them in 2016 have been disproportionately impacted again. This means our senior registrars, our most experienced junior doctors, could up be up to £18,000 worse off by the proposed deal.

'This is not only grossly unfair to these "doctors left behind" but will risk worsening the retention crisis; potentially losing these trainees just a few short years before they become consultants.'

In a statement, the Doctors’ Association concluded: ‘We also have significant concern at the incredibly tight deadline junior doctors have been given, with the BMA and NHS Employers hoping to have this deal ratified and implemented by August 2019. This begs with question whether there are significant political motivations at play which should not have any place in securing the future of junior doctors, in an NHS that can ill afford to lose a single one.’

‘We are over 10,000 doctors short across the frontlines, with a growing recruitment crisis likely to be exacerbated by Brexit. Junior doctors do much for the NHS, it is high time they were appropriately valued by this government.’

The BMA has responded, calling the move 'disappointing' and that the group should reflect on their position.

BMA junior doctors committee chair Dr Jeeves Wijesuriya said: 'These changes are the result of three years of hard negotiating and lobbying by the BMA, and represent significant improvements to the pay, conditions and training opportunities for junior doctors across the NHS in England.

'We are disappointed that this small social media group does not seem to appreciate the significance of these changes and hope it will take the time to research the details and reflect on their position.

'We must be clear, however, if our junior doctor members in England vote yes it means that these changes can be implemented as soon as possible, the additional funding is secured, we come out of dispute and have a process for negotiating on further areas of concern. A no vote means we will stay on the contract unfairly imposed on us in 2016.'

This comes as the BMA this week said it will ask its junior doctors members to vote in the proposed changes to the junior doctor contract.

Readers' comments (12)

  • How many Junior Drs are not BMA members.very difficult to find BMA membership statistics, you would think they have something to hide.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When will the BMA primarily act as a doctors union in the interests of doctors?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why am I not surprised.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • please-delete-this-fucking-profile-i-cant-delete-it-in-my-account-settings

    why is the BMA doing the negotiating? do they have proof they actually have a mandate?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I feel sorry for this country

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My trust can't even afford to implement electronic prescribing despite serious incidence relating to prescribing interactions in the past.

    The NHS cannot afford to pay its staff nor can it afford to prevent serious patient safety incidents.

    Instead it relies on reflection and elearning.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A shame that the BMA have resorted to trying to discredit DAUK than actually respond to the issues raised.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where's Optimus?

    Here we go again
    Junior doctor strikes
    lets throw in
    dissatisfaction with GMC
    potential manslaugter charges and
    pension blockage due to criminal accusations
    ??? end with contract imposed
    juniors vote with feet and leave country ??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just Your Average Joe

    We need to massively increase medical student numbers immediately due to the delay in producing qualified doctors from scratch.

    This needs to start now so shortages which are pending due to retirement of full time colleagues - and the influx of part time working in juniors. You need 2 new doctors to replace 1 retiring doctor in some specialities now, especially as retention is a huge problem.

    Act now before it is too late.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is no need to "massively increase medical student number". That has already happened. The problem is that when they roll off the production line they find that the job is nigh impossible and poorly paid. So quite rightly they emigrate, work in a very reduced fashion or go and do something else.
    I have recently been involved in training some Imperial Students and they are often stunningly bright and accomplished and for the NHS to lose these amazing people is a crying shame.
    The City Human Resources departments welcomes them with open arms, great working conditions and pay and makes them feel valued.
    The NHS is a terrible employer and the profession as a whole has allowed itself to be over regulated.
    Don't put your daughter in the (operating) theatre Mrs Worthington.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say