This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

Landmark contract deal cuts QOF by 40% and boosts global sum - but will force GPs to publish their pay

GP practices will have their QOF work slashed by almost 40% next year as part of a sweeping new contract deal which will increase the value of the global sum, create a new emergency admissions DES and see GPs forced to publish their net pay.

Under the new deal, practices will see 341 out of 900 QOF points removed from the framework - the equivalent of £54,000 for the average practice - with the majority reinvested in core GP funding.

But in return, GPs will have to accept ‘named GP’ responsibility for all patients aged 75 years and older, publish their net income from 2015 and commit to police the care their patients receive from out-of-hours providers.

Seniority payments will be reduced by 15% each year and eventually phased out and practice boundaries will be abolished completely in October 2014, although practices will not have responsibility for home visits for patients out of their catchment area.

Some 238 points (£37,000 for the average practice) will be reinvested in the global sum, and a further 100 points (£16,000 for the average practice) from the axing of the quality and productivity domain in QOF, will be ploughed into into a new ‘inappropriate hospital admissions’ DES. Three points will be invested in the learning disabilities DES.

The new DES will mean GPs will have to case-manage vulnerable patients and allow emergency providers to contact GPs to decide whether patients should be admitted to hospital or A&E.

Practices will have to publish the ‘full net income’ of their GPs from 2015, in line with the Government’s drive on transparency on public sector pay. But the BMA said that any changes would only be made alongside other healthcare professions.

A statement said: ‘We have negotiated the establishment of a working group to ensure that the calculation and publication of earnings are on a like-for-like basis with other healthcare professionals and that the published earnings would be GP NHS net earnings relating to the contract only.’

The main thrust of the changes to the GMS contract for 2014/15 are:

  • Reducing the size of the QOF by 341 points, with 238 QOF points being put into the global sum;
  • A new DES to prevent patients being inappropriately admitted to hospital, with an overall budget of £162m. This will replace the current risk-profiling DES, with extra funding from the removal of 100 QOF points from the quality and productivity domain;
  • Practices will have to publish the full net income of their GPs from 2015;
  • Complete abolition of practice boundaries from October 2014, although NHS England local area teams will take responsibility for the home visits of patients from out-of-area patients,
  • A new contractual obligation for GPs to monitor the quality of out-of-hours services when used by their patients and report any concerns;
  • Reduction of seniority payments by 15% each year, with no new entrants from April next year;
  • ‘Named GPs’ will take on accountability for patients over the age of 75, to be the main point of call for providers outside the practice;
  • Practices will have to display the result of their CQC inspection in the waiting room;
  • The introduction of the Friends and Family test from December 2014 asking patients how likely they are to recommend a GP practice;
  • The introduction of new IT systems including the ability for patients to book appointments online and access their Summary Care Record

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said that the new deal would deliver real benefit to patients and help ease the pressures on GPs.  

He said: ‘The BMA believes that through constructive talks we have reached an acceptable deal that will help to relieve workload pressures on GPs and is a first step towards enabling general practice to meet the challenges that it faces in the coming years.’

RCGP chair Professor Clare Gerada said: ‘This is welcome news for patients and for GPs as it will help us to get back to our real job of providing care where it is most needed, rather than more box-ticking.’

Dr Peter Swinyard, chair of the Family Doctor Association, also broadly welcomed the deal, but he warned that the ‘devil is in the detail’.

He said: ‘I think this is a good deal for GPs as it will take off many of the things we have been arguing about for the past year or two. It will reverse some of the complete daftness of the contract imposition from last spring and it will allow GPs to have a little more headroom to look after people and start planning care rather than spending their entire lives ticking boxes or going through their colleagues’ notes to check boxes were ticked.’

Dame Barbara Hakin, chief operating officer and deputy chief executive at NHS England, said: ‘As a GP myself for many years, I know the importance of being able to do what we have been trained for - to use our professional clinical judgment to provide care and treatment that meets all aspects of a patient’s needs.’

‘We know that patients who receive a proactive and coordinated health and social care service are less likely to need to be admitted to hospital. In fact a fifth of hospital admissions could be avoided if this happened every time, and we know that this is particularly important for the most vulnerable patients with complex needs where properly coordinated care makes such a difference.’

Related images

  • money - online

Readers' comments (74)

  • There can be no reason whatsoever for GPs to declare their net income. ....unless it is to bring more criticism and scorn on their heads from patients. I would like to know how much each of the negotiators earn in total and net?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Absolutely agree we a lot of the above. Another deal for the Boomers at the expense of the younger GPs. No point at all becoming a partner now. In fact I feel sorry for my STs - why would anyone bother to become a GP here. I'd be off to Oz like a flash if I was at the start of my career.
    Publishing our earnings - great news for the tabloids and unhappy patients.
    Great contract if you like positive headlines for the 'profession' - Bad deal if you are a GP.
    Was the BMA meant to be a trade union? Time to save those fees.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Strike!!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Steve(editor),
    I think we need some in depth analysis and interpretation of this contract. Are these changes going to make it easier or more difficult for the government to impose 7 days opening without extra funding?
    One thing might happen is hospital A/E just turned patients away to GPs as they attended the department 'inappropriately'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thanks for the comment Dr Ho - we'll be looking at doing more analysis on this next week. If anyone has questions they would like answered relating to the contract, please email them to me at steve.nowottny@pulsetoday.co.uk and we will put them to the Department of Health.

    My understanding is that the pilots of seven-day opening are beyond the scope of this contract deal, although that's something we'll be following closely as well.

    Steve Nowottny
    Editor

  • Agree....why do they need to know about our net pay...the only light at the end of that bleak tunnel is that maybe the public will see that we dont take home £150K popular to contrary beleif and that after taking out MDU, Locum and other expenses we probably earn less than them!
    And maybe there should be another section to add in our 'un-billed' hours....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Reason for publishing pay?The CQC will demand higher staff to patient ratios and those practices with higher net incomes will be looked at more closely under the guise of "value for money"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • wir sind uber gefucht

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • WOW

    So to summarize:
    No new funding to General Practice.
    No attached pay deal [ Ever hear of a trade union doing that?]
    Reduction in pay through seniority phase out.
    Increased responsibilities.
    Loss of privacy and confidentiality [ declaration of earnings].
    No meaningful reduction in workload through QOF changes.

    What a dross of a contract. I'd rather have one imposed on me year after year by the DOH.

    Wish I was a tube driver or had their trade union.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When Virgin or Tesco take over practices will they be asked to publish how much profit they make out of healthcare? I doubt it. I suspect we need to move away from a personal partnership model to contracts being held by LTD companies which we are share holders in.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If the GPC are prepared to sign off dross like this it makes you wonder if the BMA are still relevant? Perhaps we would be better off forming a campaign group to decouple general practice from political control and take back ownership of our profession? We need to leave GMS and move to a fee paying model like the dentists. This is the only route to freedom.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say