Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Landmark contract deal cuts QOF by 40% and boosts global sum - but will force GPs to publish their pay

GP practices will have their QOF work slashed by almost 40% next year as part of a sweeping new contract deal which will increase the value of the global sum, create a new emergency admissions DES and see GPs forced to publish their net pay.

Under the new deal, practices will see 341 out of 900 QOF points removed from the framework - the equivalent of £54,000 for the average practice - with the majority reinvested in core GP funding.

But in return, GPs will have to accept ‘named GP’ responsibility for all patients aged 75 years and older, publish their net income from 2015 and commit to police the care their patients receive from out-of-hours providers.

Seniority payments will be reduced by 15% each year and eventually phased out and practice boundaries will be abolished completely in October 2014, although practices will not have responsibility for home visits for patients out of their catchment area.

Some 238 points (£37,000 for the average practice) will be reinvested in the global sum, and a further 100 points (£16,000 for the average practice) from the axing of the quality and productivity domain in QOF, will be ploughed into into a new ‘inappropriate hospital admissions’ DES. Three points will be invested in the learning disabilities DES.

The new DES will mean GPs will have to case-manage vulnerable patients and allow emergency providers to contact GPs to decide whether patients should be admitted to hospital or A&E.

Practices will have to publish the ‘full net income’ of their GPs from 2015, in line with the Government’s drive on transparency on public sector pay. But the BMA said that any changes would only be made alongside other healthcare professions.

A statement said: ‘We have negotiated the establishment of a working group to ensure that the calculation and publication of earnings are on a like-for-like basis with other healthcare professionals and that the published earnings would be GP NHS net earnings relating to the contract only.’

The main thrust of the changes to the GMS contract for 2014/15 are:

  • Reducing the size of the QOF by 341 points, with 238 QOF points being put into the global sum;
  • A new DES to prevent patients being inappropriately admitted to hospital, with an overall budget of £162m. This will replace the current risk-profiling DES, with extra funding from the removal of 100 QOF points from the quality and productivity domain;
  • Practices will have to publish the full net income of their GPs from 2015;
  • Complete abolition of practice boundaries from October 2014, although NHS England local area teams will take responsibility for the home visits of patients from out-of-area patients,
  • A new contractual obligation for GPs to monitor the quality of out-of-hours services when used by their patients and report any concerns;
  • Reduction of seniority payments by 15% each year, with no new entrants from April next year;
  • ‘Named GPs’ will take on accountability for patients over the age of 75, to be the main point of call for providers outside the practice;
  • Practices will have to display the result of their CQC inspection in the waiting room;
  • The introduction of the Friends and Family test from December 2014 asking patients how likely they are to recommend a GP practice;
  • The introduction of new IT systems including the ability for patients to book appointments online and access their Summary Care Record

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said that the new deal would deliver real benefit to patients and help ease the pressures on GPs.  

He said: ‘The BMA believes that through constructive talks we have reached an acceptable deal that will help to relieve workload pressures on GPs and is a first step towards enabling general practice to meet the challenges that it faces in the coming years.’

RCGP chair Professor Clare Gerada said: ‘This is welcome news for patients and for GPs as it will help us to get back to our real job of providing care where it is most needed, rather than more box-ticking.’

Dr Peter Swinyard, chair of the Family Doctor Association, also broadly welcomed the deal, but he warned that the ‘devil is in the detail’.

He said: ‘I think this is a good deal for GPs as it will take off many of the things we have been arguing about for the past year or two. It will reverse some of the complete daftness of the contract imposition from last spring and it will allow GPs to have a little more headroom to look after people and start planning care rather than spending their entire lives ticking boxes or going through their colleagues’ notes to check boxes were ticked.’

Dame Barbara Hakin, chief operating officer and deputy chief executive at NHS England, said: ‘As a GP myself for many years, I know the importance of being able to do what we have been trained for - to use our professional clinical judgment to provide care and treatment that meets all aspects of a patient’s needs.’

‘We know that patients who receive a proactive and coordinated health and social care service are less likely to need to be admitted to hospital. In fact a fifth of hospital admissions could be avoided if this happened every time, and we know that this is particularly important for the most vulnerable patients with complex needs where properly coordinated care makes such a difference.’

Related images

  • money - online

Readers' comments (74)

  • Hussain Gandhi

    Devil in details.This was said about HCSB and look what that lumped us with.

    No comment on specifically which QoF changing and limited detail on the admission DES and named clinician aspect. I can see 2am calls happening. ...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well done BMA

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No you will NOT have 2 am calls or any ooh disturbance. You don't think that as one who helped negotiate both the 2004 and now this 2014 deal I would consent to any return to that slavery?

    Wait and read the detail in the morning when the embargo comes off!
    There are NOT bogeymen around every corner!

    Peter Holden

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bugger about seniority payments - I only started getting it this October.

    That pays my gym membership you bastards!

    Oh we'll, guess I'll just get far and die young.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ya and look what a load of sh@te the 2004 contract turned out to be.Less than 8 weeks to go now for retirement.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As I thought - they've removed the part of QoF which can be done by non GPs and added work that can only be done by a GP. My practice is a high QoF achiever so this means no additional pay, more work for me.

    And as seniority pay disappears, we are looking at real term pay cut (again). To be honest,I might as well resign from partnership and look to work as salaried GP on BMA model contract. Far more sustainable work load and responsibility and hardly any drop in real money earned/hour.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Out of interest - has anyone actually had concerns with ooh care in their locality? I get daily gripes about AED and secondary care but don't recall looking at ooh entry and thinking 'this really should be better'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Have to agree with Anon 0.13am. Can't see that we will have lost any work done by GPs on 1/4/14. Work done by nurses might reduce a bit but GPs will have a lot more responsibility and liability. Loss of seniority will see most sensible senior GPs being lost to the profession when taking into account the previously imposed pension contribution hikes and fines for overpayment

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I left the UK 3 years ago. Anyone with any sense will do the same before April. If you stay you will face massive increases in indemnity fees, pay through the nose for your pensions and earn less per hour than your practice nurse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Holden, a bit of premature high fives amongst some GPs. 2004 contract said QOF had to be evidence based and only changed by negotiation, MPIG was to be paid in perpetuity and contract could only be changed unilaterally in emergencies. That didn't pan out. Once concept of GPs being responsible and sometimes available OOH is established in 2014 DoH will gradually push boundaries and we will doing more and more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say