This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Separate Scottish deal on GP contract defers decision on MPIG and secures QOF concessions

Scottish GPs have reached a separate agreement with the Scottish Government on changes to the GP contract, which includes the deferring of any decision about the future of the MPIG and a raft of concessions on the QOF changes proposed for 2013/14.

GPC Scotland said the deal, negotiated before any agreement has been reached on the UK-wide contract, would safeguard Scottish GPs from taking on too much extra work without being compensated, unlike the changes the Department of Health in England has threatened to impose.

However, the GPC Scotland and the Scottish Government have agreed to wait for the recommendations of the Review Body on Doctors’ and Dentists’ Remuneration before agreeing to an uplift to core funding.

Full details of the Scottish deal have yet to be released, and are expected later today. However GPC Scotland told Pulse that 77 points of from the organisational QOF domain would be moved into core funding. Any decision on the phasing out of MPIG is to be deferred for the time being, and the deal rejects some NICE proposals for new QOF work, including questionnaires for exercise in hypertension patients.

The GPC Scotland has also secured concessions over the planned hike in QOF thresholds, which will not be raised to the same extent as is expected in the rest of the UK, and quality and productivity indicators related to reducing emergency admissions will be removed in return for GPs agreeing to do risk profiling for patients with complex health needs.

GPC Scotland chair Dr Alan McDevitt said: ‘We’re going to shift some of the funding and work from organisational into core funding, 77 points’ worth. There will be no organisational domain after this in Scotland after this. There will be a new one, public health, which will have a management domain. All of the other ones will be in public health as management points, and probably another one that we have not got a name for yet but it will be about patient safety.’

He added: ‘With the correction factor, we have agreed to examine what that means in Scotland and what we can do with that. We have agreed to look at that over the next 18 months. There will definitely not be any change to that at the moment in Scotland.’

‘We started to try and achieve an agreement - for example the move of the organisational points into core funding is a major step towards stability of practice funding and was one of the things we wanted to achieve in the UK. That is not on offer as part of the imposition. The QP area is something we’ve been working on - these things that were going to be imposed as extra work in England as opposed to being replaced by other work in Scotland.’

He said funding lost from the QOF organisational domain would be shifted into core funding.

‘The other thing is that the Scottish Government has made it quite clear that they are going to wait for the DDRB report and will respond to that in terms of an uplift. That is quite a big thing as well. We have not negotiated that because we are waiting for the DDRB.

‘They have said they will respond to the report with an uplift, so there will be an uplift. That’s what we asked for, because we definitely want to hear the DDRB recommendation.’

Asked whether the Scottish agreement could pave the way for a negotiated UK-wide agreement, Dr McDevitt said: ‘I’d like to think it would. Our Government has agreed that it wants to help stabilise and support general practice and that this was a worthwhile aim. You’d think they [UK] would look at some of the things we’ve done and see if they would be worth doing. You are not going to achieve moving the work towards managing the most high risk patients in the community, and avoiding unnecessary hospital admissions, unless it is the kind of package that does that.’

‘We were doing an agreement rather than negotiating an imposition.’

It comes as GPC deputy chairman Dr Richard Vautrey indicated via his Twitter account that he expected the Department of Health to publish long-awaited details of its planned imposition for the rest of the UK imminently.

He tweeted: ‘Expect @DHgovuk to follow Autumn statement and bury the very bad news of imposing GP contract changes very shortly.’

Related images

  • scottish flag

Readers' comments (11)

  • Vinci Ho

    We are obviously interested in details, editor.
    Then the question is ' what are the reasons that ''things'' can be agreed and done in Scotland but not in England?'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Full details are expected to be published later today - we're hoping to be able to publish more in the next hour or so though...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Obviously this will be useful for the GPC if they can use this to bolster their stand. I find it hard why GP`s cannot see their patients privately while the consultants can. Many of my patients will be happy to see me privately but cannot as I am their NHS G.P (GMS). This may mean that those able to pay will get a quicker service than trying to get more appointments which filled up by the usual "worried well".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    fully agree with Dr Anonymous about the unfair restriction of trade on GPs - especially now that we have a split contract and are only in contract to look after our patients 0800-1830. Why we cannot see our patients privately in the evening or on weekends defeats logic - there may have been a point when we had 24 hour responsibility but certainly not now. Have argued the toss at LMC Conferences over the years to no avail and government shows no sign of budging on this when I mention it in Whitehall. Will raise again next time I'm there.
    On the Scottish contract - this is bye-bye NHS and welcome EHS, SHS, NIHS and WHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • already given up hope NI GP

    Oh dear,divide and conquer.Lets see how much negotiating power scottish GPC still have in a couple of years time,Alex Salmon not withstanding.Always better together.............

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When is the next train to Edinburgh?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Glad I work in Scotland and not England!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Congratulations GPC Scotland! Pity you are not representing the rest of the UK instead of the current incompetents.
    Lessons for negotiators 1 you actually sit around a table with the DOH instead of sitting in BMA house 2 you negotiate and make concessions and others will too.
    Here's hoping that both the GPC and the DOH learn from our Scottish colleagues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Are we dealing with different agendas?
    In Scotland, it would seem that the priority is to reach an agreement that provides stability and delivery of GP services: is this the same agenda in England?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No, Mary, the increasingly explicit aim is to destablise primary care south of Hadrian's wall so that private providers take over.

    Im just ashamed that the Welsh government equally are treating their GPs with the same contempt it seems. I feel there is no longer and NHS to speak of, and it is time for the other devolved nations to fight on alone. England is lost. We could save Wales/Ni if we fight hard.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say