This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Superannuation changes will have 'distorting effect' on locums

The Government’s proposed changes to transfer responsibility for locum superannuation payments to practices will drive down locum fees and may make locuming a ‘less desirable option’ for GPs, says the BMA.

The official BMA submission to the consultation on the Government’s proposed contract changes also says that the workload for administering locum superannuation payments will mean practices use them less and that GP partners might be more unwilling to take sick leave.

The GPC reiterated its call for the proposal to be delayed for a year claiming that the Government has not yet spelled out how it intends practices to be reimbursed money they spend on paying the 14% employers’ superannuation charges, which are currently paid by PCTs.

It said: ‘We do not currently know the Government’s intentions for how the transfer of these costs would be handled in PMS practices. Delaying by 12 months would also allow time to assess current locum use by PMS practices and make appropriate arrangements.’

Its survey revealed that around 30% of practices think they will cut back on the use of locums because of the financial pressures caused by the contract proposals.

The GPC said: ‘We are concerned that an unintended consequence of the proposals could be that partners are put under pressure not to take sick leave when they are unwell, due to the practice no longer being able to afford the cost of a locum.

‘Transferring employers superannuation costs for locums into global sum is clearly an attempt to cap the Government’s contribution forever. This will increase costs to practices over time.’

However, Dr Richard Fieldhouse, chief executive of the National Association of Non-Principals, said it was unlikely that the use of locums will decrease: ‘If I had a penny for every time I heard practices want to cut down on locums. It just never happens. The analogy I use is that of any budget: if you spend £100 a week on food and now only have £80, you cut down on luxuries.

‘No practice has thought “let’s treat ourselves and get a locum in”. Locums are not a luxury item – they are a necessity. Practices will need to use locums because patients need to be seen.’

Readers' comments (2)

  • How the hell is this a good idea. We now have a few people sitting in an increasingly dwindling number of LASCA offices, that will now need to deal with inputs from thousands of practices instead of the locums sending in their own details. A recipe for total disaster. If the Global sum does not cover the amounts appropriately (and it won't) either practices will pay the locums less, or they will indeed, employ fewer of them. (I think Richard is wrong..we have cut back locums substantially already, and qwill probably cut back further)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ok.
    I'm a GP Locum.
    I've done a quick pole of the Practise Manager and GP Partners that I work for about this issue. They, this is all, have not idea that they are expected to pay the 14% from April 1st 2013.
    Other PCT and Practise have issued blanket statements saying that they will not be paying.

    We would like clear leadership.
    Take some Movicol and Get on with it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say