Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Voters 'will expect incoming Government to solve GP crisis', say GP leaders

Politicians must address the issue of 'full' GP surgeries when the country goes to the polls for a snap general election proposed for 8 June, doctors' leaders have said.

Responding to the news that Prime Minister Theresa May will bring a motion to Parliament to call an election in just seven weeks' time, BMA chair Dr Mark Porter said 'politicians of all partiers' must not 'duck the crisis in the NHS any longer', as NHS staff including GPs are now working under 'impossible conditions'.

And Dr Richard Vautrey, deputy chair of the GPC, said voters would 'expect' any incoming Government to reverse the situation of GP underfunding to solve the crisis in general practice.

Dr Vautrey said: 'It is widely accepted that general practice is in crisis, with spiralling workload pressures that most GPs believe are putting patients at risk, and too few GPs, practices nurses and other staff to meet the growing needs of an increasingly elderly population.

'Voters will expect any incoming Government to reverse a decade of underfunding general practice services and make real and tangible commitments to addressing unsustainable workload pressures and to rebuilding general practice and community services, because if general practice fails the NHS will fail.'

Meanwhile, Dr Porter said this comes as 'consecutive governments have been in denial about the state of the NHS' and at the time of elections, they have 'chosen to use it as a political football'.

He said: 'Health is always one of the most important issues for the people of this country and with the NHS at breaking point, having been put through one of the worst winters on record, it must be a central issue in the upcoming election. The NHS must not be pushed to the margins in the focus on Brexit.

'Staff have ensured that we still have one of the best health services in the world, but years of underinvestment while patient demand has been rising means that it is now failing too many people, too often.'

He said this comes as 'our hospitals and GP surgeries are full and social care is on its knees, with staff working under impossible conditions'.

And, despite calls for Britain's exit from the EU not to overshadow election policies, he added that there were still 'serious question marks over the future of thousands of EU citizens who are a vital part of the NHS', which did need to be addressed.

He concluded: 'We call on politicians of all parties not to duck this crisis any longer, and instead to outline credible and sustainable plans that will safeguard the future of the fully funded and supported NHS that staff want and patients deserve.'

His comments come as Pulse revealed a 150% rise in patients forced to move GP practice, as closures hit record levels in the past year and as a DH-backed study showed that over two-thirds of GPs plan to leave or reduce hours in the next five years.

Also commenting on the election announcement, RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said that it was 'crucial' that 'any future government' delivers the £2.4bn GP Forward View rescue package for general practice.

She said: 'It is vital that patient care is kept at the forefront of debate over the coming weeks.

'Once the new Government is formed, we will continue to press for the urgent delivery of all the pledges made in NHS England's GP Forward View - and for equivalent investment in GP services in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.'

Readers' comments (20)

  • It's an opportunity to get rid of Hunt, Stevens and Cameron's wild dream of 7/24 delusional service. I hope people in this country stand up to the task of mopping these cowboys off the floor and bringing to book NHSE renegades before relegating this organization to the archives where it rightly belongs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ONE THING THAT WOULD REALLY HELP IS TO GET RID OF THE "POLITICAL GANGSTA" JEREMY HUNT AND REPLACE HIM WITH A COMMON OR GARDEN BULLY LIKE THE USUAL HEALTH MINISTERS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Voters will expect no such thing. The Department of Health has an excellent news management service that aided by the Telegraph and Mail very effectively rebuts all the BMA bleating.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The BMA needs to come up with a viable alternative to the NHS. Also, stop it's behind closed doors, opaque decision making processes, coupled with independently audited accounts. And fixed terms for chairs e.g. 5 years. Otherwise, the likes of Mark Porter remain in power longer than the likes of North Korea's Kim Jong-Un.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @2.52pm
    A properly funded NHS is a viable alternative to the Conservative funded NHS.
    Go look at the funding of health services elsewhere.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • doctordog.

    We did better under labour than the conservatives.
    Can't imagine voting for any party with Diane Abbott in it though.
    Depressing choice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Don't get your hopes up folks. The public aren't coming to our aid and wishing otherwise is folly. They'll only miss us when we are gone. And that might not be long.

    Tory majority of 50 plus. Buy shares in private healthcare.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ 4.06

    So why has no one else adopted our system? Because it doesn't work as well as alternatives that deliver better universal healthcare.

    Remember Labour brought in a huge expansion of PFI and mid staffs was on their watch. The problem is a soviet style politically run health system that fails in virtually every major comparison with other comparable health systems (excluding the outlying US).

    And better performing and funded healthcare systems elsewhere use a combination of co-payments, insurance and tax payer funded subsidies. It seems like a solution but no one including the political parties, the BMA or doctors seem to championing it. Because it's not popular with voters in the UK who, on the whole, don't want to pay high taxes or insurance for their healthcare.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NHS at breaking point
    The pubic have become used to this,they hear it all the time,it no longer means anything to them
    The BMA has failed to spell out, in simple terms, what this actually means
    How likely are you to die on a waiting list,how short will your stay in hospital be compared to other countries,how much more likely are you to develop an infection
    Less broad generalisations,more specific practical examples

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    And we have the RCGP Prof acting as the DoH mouthpiece crowing about the £2.4bn GPFV.

    Stuff the GPFV.

    Seriously what the hell? RCGP promoting DoH and NHSE Policy. FFS!

    The £2.4bn would be useful in Primary Care. Better payments. Lower workload would be a start. Just a start. It will require way more than £2.4bn to rescue GP from its demise.

    If we can get a breather and maybe a lot of adult thinking about what can be done, when and how it should be funded it might form the platform for the future.

    Otherwise it is bleak.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.