This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

State-backed indemnity scheme funding ‘still up for negotiation’

The funding for the state-based indemnity scheme is still up for negotiation, despite the Government claiming it is set to come out of existing funding.

The scheme is set to cover indemnity for GPs and will be introduced in April 2019.

The Department of Health and Social Care today released a set of frequently asked questions about the scheme, which said it expects ‘funding for the scheme to come from existing resources allocated for general practice’.

However, the BMA’s GP Committee told Pulse that this is still a matter of contract negotiations.

It also follows the funding announcement by Prime Minister Theresa May of £3.5bn a year extra for primary care by 2023/24.

Pulse understands that indemnity forms part of the contract negotiations for 2019/20, which are at a deadlock over the issue of funding the state-backed scheme.

In its FAQs released today, the DHSC said: ‘The state-backed scheme is being designed to meet the needs of current and future GPs, offer affordable cover for GPs, and offer value for money for taxpayers.

‘Our intention is that individuals covered by the scheme will not be required to make any payments into the scheme. We would expect funding for the scheme to come from existing resources allocated for general practice, and discussions are on-going with the GPC.’

GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey reiterated that no decision about the funding had yet been made. ‘The matter is still up for negotiation,’ he said.

Readers' comments (6)

  • LET'S ROB FROM PETER (PARTNERS) TO PAY PAUL (LOCUM AND SALARIED).

    SIMPLES !

    BYE, BYE MORE GP PARTNERS !!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    “Funding will come from existing resources”. Given that a full time GP pays over 10k per year, this will be a HUGE sum of money, how can it possibly come from “existing resources”?
    Anyone else think this State Sponsored Indemnity is going to be a massive disappointment? Still, at least HMG stopped us moaning about it for a year with their usual jam tomorrow empty promises.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's a fantasy to thing Government will foot the bill.

    The BMA should stop colliding with this farce, we need legal change from the Politicians, perhaps the New Zealand model, not cosy chats with the useless brigade from Tavistock square.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's a fantasy to think Government will foot the bill.

    The BMA should stop colluding with this farce, we need legal change from the Politicians, perhaps the New Zealand model, not cosy chats with the useless brigade from Tavistock square.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • if this does not do what promised then prepare for further exodus.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The state has made life easier for parasitic and destructive ambulance chasers and harder for those few people left providing the service.
    Perhaps that’s why ambulance chasers outnumber available GPs In this area

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say