This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

New Scottish contract gets green light as 72% of GPs back its rollout

GPs in Scotland have supported the biggest reform to the GP contract since 2004, in a landmark vote that saw nearly three-quarters back it.

The ballot saw the new Scottish GP contract backed by 71.5% of participating GPs, while 28.5% were opposed. However, only 39% of eligible GPs voted.

The ambitious contract, which would set Scottish GPs on a different path to the rest of the UK, would see direct reimbursement of practice and staff expenses, a move away from GPs owning premises and a focus on the GP as an expert medical generalist at the head of a multidisciplinary team.

It also includes the transfer of responsibility of some services, including vaccination to health boards without loss of funding.

BMA figures suggest almost two-thirds of practices would see overall funding increase under a new funding formula and the proposals also include a minimum earnings expectation to ensure no GP partner earns less than £80,430.

A second round of negotiations, focusing on direct reimbursement and GP pay will begin in 2020 and will be subject to a second poll.

But some GPs, especially those in rural areas, have been outspoken about their opposition to the contract. The Rural GP Association of Scotland has said its members were concerned that rural issues were not being addressed and fears have also been raised that the contract moves general practice towards being a salaried service.

Yet others have said the contract offers a real opportunity for general practice and at a special LMC meeting in Glasgow in December the majority of representatives agreed that the proposals addressed the key issues of sustainable funding, reduced risk, attractiveness of the profession and reduced workload.

An early Pulse poll suggested the results could be tight with respondents divided down the middle, but this vote has a clear majority for the GPC to move ahead with the plans.

Dr Alan McDevitt, Chair of the BMA’s Scottish GP Committee said: ’I am delighted that the proposed contract that we have worked with the Scottish Government to create will now be implemented. I truly believe that this contract offers stability and security of funding for practices in Scotland and will help to reduce the pressures of GP workload and improve GP recruitment and retention.’

Dr Carey Lunan, chair of RCGP Scotland, said: ’The launch of the new contract and the polling of the profession has not been without its challenges and many GPs, particularly in remote and rural and in deprived urban practices, have raised concerns about the impact of the proposed changes and how this will affect delivery of patient care in their communities. However, many have also recognised the opportunities that this contract potentially offers to sustain and rebuild the profession that is at crisis point in many areas across the country.’

Dr Iain Kennedy, medical secretary of Highland LMC, said his members would be disappointed with the results of the vote but they accepted the outcome.

‘In terms of moving forward we will be inviting Dr Alan McDevitt to our next meeting of Highland LMC because we need to move on and see what this means for our practices. There will be a lot of anxiety and uncertainty.’

He added that he hoped the working group set up to deal with rural issues would be a good thing.

‘We do need open and transparent conversations to continue to enable rural practices to flourish and we have particular concerns about recruitment and retention and sustainability payments.’ 

What happens next

Work will now take place to allow the first phase of the new contract to be implemented from April 2018, with a second phase of changes only taking place after a second poll of the profession in 2021.

Phase 1 of the contract will introduce a new funding formula, increase investment by £23 million and start collection of data to inform Phase 2

During phase 1 there is a guarantee to protect practice income and expenses.

In 2019/20 the GP minimum earnings expectation will be introduced.

Phase 2 in 2020/21 will guarantee income range and direct reimbursement of expenses

Between 2018-2021 there will be service redesign with non-expert medical generalist workload needs redistributed to the wider primary care multi-disciplinary team. Several services will be developed to support GPs in their practices including:

  • vaccinations services;
  • pharmacotherapy services;
  • community treatment and care services;
  • urgent care services; and
  • additional professional clinical and non clinical services including acute musculoskeletal physiotherapy services, community mental health services and community link worker services.

Each of the 31 HSCPs in Scotland will develop a ’Primary Care Improvement Plan’, which will outline how these services will be introduced before the end of the transition period in 2021.

Readers' comments (20)

  • Are we so apathetic that only 39% of GPs voted in contract ballot?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "However, only 39% of eligible GPs voted."

    Then the remaining 60% have absolutely no right to complain

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    Or maybe most of the 61% are over 50 and/or planning on packing it all in so don’t really care either way......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • £4.38 per head of population (GDP per head circa £17k).
    Now how much professional service can I get for £4.38 in 2018 (and in the following years)? Indeed, how much chocolate, sausages etc can I get?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Nigel , result as in your predictions for the year but with bigger margin of the Yes votes.
    It would be interesting to know the characters of this 39% who voted , though.
    If most are younger colleagues, then we have to respect the will of our next generation(s).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • True Vinci, even if it is an unwitting vote for lifelong misery and relative poverty. No great joy in being able to say 'I told you so'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Council of Despair

    and so it begins - soon it will be the move to be 'Consultant' GPs, followed by an all salaried service, followed by on-call rota as in secondary care etc.

    how soon till Wales follows? then England?

    at least NI is looking to exit fully which is the best option in the long term but as for the mainland this is the end of General Practice as we know it for better or worse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous Locum is spot on. Hello salaried service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Decorum Est
    The £23m is not being distributed equally across all practices, but being targeted to those with the highest workloads who are currently not receiving due funding. This is largely those practices struggling with the urban age demographic which has not been adequately catered for previously.
    Next year the travesty of FT partners earning less than £80K pa will disappear, wherever they happen to work.
    The health boards will then have a responsibility over the next 3 years to take away management of immunisation, complex dressings and other hospital directed nonsense (no more can you check this in 1 week sort of stuff, DMARD monitoring etc). This will not lead to a loss in income, but will yield either extra time, or resources at the practices.
    I remain sceptical about how fertile the Magic Physio/nurse/pharmacist/paramedic tree will be, but the Govt have to be accountable for the success or failure of this strand.
    Also practices can start to hand over rental risks and even have their properties brought back over a longer timeframe, to lead to no buy-ins.
    @Roderick Shaw
    Will it lead to a salaried service? I guess old boys like you and I ultimately don't have much of a say in this, but I don't see how it definitely leads down that path. The Govt are aware that the current contractor service is 20% more efficient than a total salaried model and they don't have money to burn. They do have to make sure that the population has a GP service and I'm much more convinced that a service will exist in Scotland that matches the founding NHS principles than anywhere else in these Isles at the moment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pulse can be really cr@p on occasion. The headline 72% is very misleading as only a minority of GPs bothered to vote. Please correct my arithmetic if wrong, but the actual figure is 28% of GPs "back it's rollout".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say