This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Gateways using nurses to screen GP referrals

By Edward Davie | 10 Aug 2011

Exclusive GP referrals are being screened and bounced back to general practice by nurses, physiotherapists and even podiatrists employed by PCTs to staff referral management centres, a Pulse investigation reveals.

Data supplied under the Freedom of Information Act shows PCTs that operate referral management centres to reduce the number of GP referrals to secondary care are commonly using non-doctors for triage.

In February, Pulse revealed that referral management centres were rejecting as many as one GP referral in eight for services including hip and knee replacements, cataract surgery, allergy care, IVF and tonsil removal, and one GP in three had their referrals screened by a referral management centre.

Our investigation asked for details of triage at eight PCTs known to be using referral gateways. Five – NHS Bournemouth and Poole, NHS Hertfordshire, NHS Manchester, NHS Oldham and NHS Plymouth – said they used non-doctors to assess GP referrals.

NHS Manchester – which pays private provider Harmoni to run a controversial referral management centre to screen GP referrals remotely from Southampton – said it used two podiatric nurses and a non-medical prescriber with a diploma in podiatric medicine to triage GP referrals for vascular conditions.

NHS Oldham admitted more than a third of its staff screening GP referrals in opthalmology, diabetes, urology and musculoskeletal conditions – 15 out of 40 – were non-doctors.

GPs expressed concern that the use of less qualified staff could reduce the consistency of decision making and lead to errors in patient care.

Dr Andrew Mimnagh, chair of Sefton LMC, said he knew of several instances elsewhere in which ‘patients had come to harm from not being referred'.

He said: ‘Nurses assess patients according to rigid criteria and do not have the experience to make flexible decisions in the same way a doctor can. In one case, a patient was rejected for a replacement hip operation by a nurse at a referral centre despite the fact his hip was dislocating. According to the nurse's criteria, he wasn't reaching a high enough pain threshold because he already had an artificial hip that cured the pain. Nurses do not have the knowledge to know when they are out of their depth.'

Recent research has suggested GP peer review improves GPs' referral behaviour, but referral management centres do not.

Professor Helen Smith, head of public health and primary care at the Brighton and Sussex Medical School and a GP in Brighton – who conducted the study of referral management centres – said she had ‘concerns' over their use and use of non-specialists to triage referrals: ‘There could be problems if formal training and checking on the validity of decisions being made is not happening.'

Secondary care specialists also said they had concerns that under-qualified medical staff might not appropriately triage patients.

Dr Sarah Clarke, vice-president of the British Cardiovascular Society and consultant cardiologist at Papworth Hospital in Cambridge, said: ‘I'm not surprised GPs are concerned about this. Not everybody fits the rigidity of protocols.'

But PCTs defended their use. An NHS Oldham spokesperson said: ‘Nearly all GP referrals go through a referral gateway, run by local GPs. There are some areas where we've had multidisciplinary teams in place for some years. They are people with the appropriate clinical skills and experts in that specialty.'

 

How non-doctors are triaging referrals

• NHS Oldham: Nurses, nurse practitioners and physio-therapists triaging referrals in ophthalmology, diabetes, musculoskeletal and urology

• NHS Plymouth: Nurse specialists triaging GP referrals along with GPs and consultants

• NHS Hertfordshire: Community and diabetes nurses triaging referrals

• NHS Manchester: Podiatrists and nurses triaging vascular referrals

• NHS Bournemouth and Poole: Using nurses and nurse specialists

Source: Pulse investigation of eight gateways

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, Other healthcare professional,
10 Aug 2011
I do not see a problem with triage by a non GP provided the healthcare professional is triaging within their area. For example musculo skeletal triage by an Advanced MSK practitioner (Physio or other). In many instances they will be more competent than many GPs, who by definition are not specialists. The danger comes when triage is by somebody working outside of their comptence.

Like many stories these days the emphasis is blown out of proportion and comments about 'patients coming to harm through non referral' are unhelpful especially as that can also be thrown at GPs.

It is time people recognised that 'doctors' are not the only competent healthcare professionals and the NHS has to use it resources effectively and efficiently
Average (0Votes)
Top
Aung Moe, GP registrar,
10 Aug 2011
I am a GP specialty registrar who has had many years of previous hospital experience in various specialties. By definition, GPs are now specialists who specialize in Family Medicine. Probably, you are not aware of their specialist status. Maybe you are confused with sub-specialists - yes they do not deal with only one specialty. However, they have been given specialist status. It takes 5 years (2 foundation years and 3 specialty registrar years) after having qualified as a doctor. There is a plan to extend the training to 7 years in the future. Just think of other people who have got a degree from a University after spending 3 years. You also need to understand the reasons for referral. Some referrals are just for second opinion while others are due to patient request. You can't just look at the referral letter and decide what is appropriate and what is not appropriate without taking comprehensive history and thorough examination. It is not that we do not appreciate the contribution of non-medical healthcare professionals, it is just that they need to do the job that they are trained to do and that they are good at.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Vinci Ho, GP Partner,
10 Aug 2011
Two issues:
(1) the naivety of presuming all referrals can be filtered by non GPs who do not actually see the patients face to face . There is something called medico-legal issue , my friend .MDU or MPS will have interesting comment on this
(2) the quality of referral letters is variable and needs to be properly addressed
Like everything , there are two sides of the argument but this is not about 'Who the hell you GPs think you are? We cannot do without you?'
Average (0Votes)
Top
Nigel Dickson, GP Partner,
10 Aug 2011
I have no problem as an aging GP (not sure the word "experienced" is politically correct these days - exerienced of what?) of my patients referrals being triaged face to face with patient by equally knowledgeble clinicians. In fact I think its an excellent idea. Learning experience for us all. GP, patient and triager. Patient doesn't need a chunk of their body slicing off - good news all round I'd have said.

What drives me stark raving bonkers is some twit triaging my paper referral based on its quality or otherwise without seeing poor patient who my little essay relates to. Its discriminatory, dangerous and unprofessional. GMC type stuff - its not the patients fault that I'm a crap GP - the worst offenders locally in the past have been the child psychiatrists and adult learning disabilities consultants. Refusing point blank to see children on vulnerable adult based on contents of GP's letters - not fitting their "secret" criteria apparently. Children has been sorted with introduction of nurses seeing children and triaging GP's referrals - win win. Nurses can often help distressed families without need to see psychiatrist. Learning disabilities remains a challenge.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Clare Gerada, GP Partner,
10 Aug 2011
This is very worrying and something that the College and GPC are concerned about.
Using other providers to help us clinically is fine - but referral management systems reduce patient choice, create additional barriers, are not cost effective, deprofessionalise highly skilled and trained GPs and as far as the Kings Fund report shows- do not work.
What we need to invest in is
a) audit tools for GPs to use to examine their referral practice
b) better use of NICE guidelines
c) Joint learning events across Federations of practices
d) better communication between specialists and GPs
e) more time for reflection in practice
f) more use of educational activities and initiatives to improve referral practice - where there is a problem

When a GP makes a decision to refer this is usually done at the end of a long process of engagement and discussion with the patient. This should be respected

Clare
Average (0Votes)
Top
David Fielding, Sessional/Locum GP,
10 Aug 2011
Naturally, a GP-to-allied health professional referral should be screened by the health professional concerned, but a GP-to-consultant referral should be filtered by a consultant. We already have girl guide types vetting mental health team referrals and cannot refer direct to a chosen team member direct (eg for CBT or to a psychiatrist). There is also, of course, rationing of access to non-medics by insisting that patients can often ONLY be referred by a GP - silly waste of our time -bring on self referral for patients to these folk.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Esmat Bhimani, Salaried GP,
10 Aug 2011
I am against even for GPs triaging my referals.I am not aware of any training or qualifications for triaging referals
Average (0Votes)
Top
Clare Gerada, GP Partner,
10 Aug 2011
What we need is to all audit our referrals against outcomes. Then learn from this and share the learning with our teams and federations. I don't want my referrals triaged unless it's by the team that i am referring the patient to - and then i don't expect them to send the referral back to me if they don't think its "appropriate". This is all about demand reduction - not about patient care! The two are not the same.

Clare
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Other healthcare professional,
11 Aug 2011
The triaging has come as a result of few lazy GPs who refer without even seeing the patients, mainly in English practices. So the policy was to triage referrals from all asian doctors mainly, and treat most of asian doctors as incompetent. This wont work because most GPs will treat initially and refer only when it is necessary and if such actions are disrespected, the NHS will pay terrific compensations and become a popper. I am waiting for the day when NHS will be shut permanently when the government will understand the corruption in the NHS,until then these terms of triage etc will continue.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous, GP Partner,
11 Aug 2011
psychiatrist trust all inormation we give . the only thing they do not trust is decision by gp that they should see psychiatrist. it help them to reduce work load.
i have started writting "i have done all i can and i have nothing to offfer. please please see him/her"
Average (0Votes)
Top
Nigel Dickson, GP Partner,
11 Aug 2011
Even the clever hospital doctors don't always get this triaging lark right - I referred up a little greek baby girl who's "cardiac specialists" in Greece were seeing her every 3 months (its all private there so kids see "specialists" rather than GP's) who were doing echo's each time and had diagnosed "patent foramin ovale" 11 month old baby girl looked fine to me but had a heart murmur (unfortunately I hear them in 1/3rd of my child patients which I'd always been led to believe by the "evidence" was crap - turns out the "evidence" was crap and old duffer GP Nigel's skull wasn't just an empty resonance tube) paediatric cardiologist didn't see child triaged my paper referral saying patent foramin ovale's close spontaneously and don't require cardiology intervention. Fair enough - sorry to have bothered you - lesson number 3 learned. Ehh don't think so. Poor child collapsed age 2 ended up in local A&E where they diagnosed bacterial endocarditis with vegtations on her tricuspid valve which needed a plastic repair and they closed her VSD at same time. Opps - so much for paper triage then? Might have been different if triage had been by a podiatrist/physio/care assistant/nurse seeing the baby? Not sure my crap paper referral was issue - but as GP you can only try your best? As regards private system in Greece - any willing provider ring any bells? Couldn't "care in private community" Robbing the poor to pay the rich? "Inverse pay law" of current GP QOF system - single handed GP's like me looking after challenged patients in cities get less pay because we have naughty patients - mppphh that's fair. Now we are ruled again by the landed gentry isn't it time we listened to our annonomus contributor and bring on private GP care - "the good old days" - good for whom - will not be for single handed City GPs like me - my lot will not be able to pay me any ligitemate cash - wonder what my big flock of 2,800 patients would pay me with instead these day if we did try and insitute widespread social disruption? Stuff they collected on their day out in London? Shame Norway and Sweden are so cold.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Lucy Reid, PCT,
11 Aug 2011
My concern over these referral management centres are whether they are used to appropriately triage referrals to secondary care or manage the waiting lists. And it's not all the PCTs fault either! In NHS Wales, the triage is done by the hospitals (rather than a PCO initiative) and I have seen countless examples of where a patient has been taken off the waiting list and referred back to the GP because their BP was 1 point over the "limit" when the patient has no history of BP problems or where a UTI has been identified. The triaging is done weeks before the procedure but the GP is told to refer the patient back when the "issue" is sorted and they end up at the bottom of the list again. This approach isn't helpful to anyone - the hospital will have to see the patient at some point.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Peter Wilson, GP Partner,
12 Aug 2011
what I would like a definitive answer to and which I have long wondered about is that when a patient suffers harm due to a referral centre bounce back and the case goes to court where does the liability lie? Are the PCTs insuring these non doctors? Or will it be the GP they go after anyway?
Average (0Votes)
Top
Sue Hayward-Giles, Other healthcare professional,
18 Aug 2011
Multi disciplinary interface provides community based access to specialist MSD services. This often means that patients can avoid secondary care waits by being managed in the community. Interface is staffed, mainly by physiotherapists, who have experience and expertise to assess, treat, manage and discharge patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

These physiotherapists, often know as Extended Scope Practitioners, usually have at least five years post qualifying experience and have skills that allow for:

-Full history and clinical examination
-Ordering and interpreting of investigations -Communicating investigation results to patients -Giving self care advice -Providing physiotherapy management and advice -Administering other interventions such as joint injections, prescribing and directly listing for surgery.

A recent CSP survey of MSD Interface in three regions has highlighted the many different models of MSK triage that exist, Driven by local need, resource and intelligence. As a result they show wide variation in terms of staffing, access, service delivered and outcome measures used. However they can demonstrate value for money and a positive effect on patient experience and orthopaedic conversion rates.

'GPs have expressed concern that the use of less qualified staff, such as physiotherapists could reduce the consistency of decision making and lead to errors in patient care'. There is no evidence of this. In fact far from being a 'poor quality option', physiotherapists offer high levels of expertise to manage this patient group freeing GPs to manage other more complex issues.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Padmaja Chalasani, Consultant,
18 Aug 2011
"There is no evidence of this": were there any attempts to look for evidence in well designed research or is it an assumption that there is no evidence for that because no one 'shouted out loud' yet...
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here