This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

31 commissioning groups sign landmark deal with private firms to provide 'organisational support'

By Gareth Iacobucci | 14 Oct 2011

Clinical commissioning groups representing several thousand GPs across London have signed a multi-million pound deal with private consultants handpicked by NHS bosses to help support the rollout of GP commissioning.

The £7m landmark deal has seen 31 CCGs sign contracts for a programme of ‘intensive organisational support' for commissioning from the likes of KPMG, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Capita and McKinsey, which has formed a joint partnership with the RCGP's Centre for Commissioning and consultancy Ashridge Alliancce to advise CCGs ahead of authorisation.

NHS London said all 38 of the capital's pathfinders were expected to sign up to the ‘development framework' within weeks, and that £3.7m had been allocated for ‘leadership training' for managers and clinicians.

The list of approved commissioning partners, which also includes Ernst and Young, Capsticks Solictors, Binder Dijker Otte, and Entrusted Health Partnership, was drawn up by NHS London after a competitive tender designed to provide CCGs with assistance in organisational development, leadership training, strategy, finance and market analysis. 

The consultants will offer CCGs coaching, leadership plans, resources and how-to guides, 360 degree feedback, self-assessment tools and organisational development plans to assess their readiness for authorisation.

The move significantly boosts the private sector's stake in advising GP commissioners, after Pulse first revealed earlier this year that dozens of CCGs had enlisted the support of McKinsey and Pricewaterhouse Coopers with QIPP, budget holding and governance.

NHS London said the framework would leave CCGs in ‘a better position' when they take on full responsibility in 2013, by giving clinicians ‘the confidence and skills they will need to commission high quality care,' while also ensuring they keep ‘a tight grip on performance and quality of services'.

The programme has been funded from London's Multi Professional Education and Training (MPET) budget, at a cost of £75,000 per pathfinder, plus 40p per patient. NHS London said the funding could only have been spent on the training and development of clinicians and so will not affect delivery of frontline services.

Dr Howard Freeman, assistant medical director at NHS London, chair of the Londonwide GP commissioning council, and a GP in Tooting, said: ‘Clinicians involved have recognised from the start their need for support over and above that given by PCTs to help commissioning groups develop.'

‘They have worked with NHS London to tailor an organisational development framework specific to their needs and are now making excellent use of the skilled providers they can access.'

Hannah Farrar, director of strategy and commissioning development at NHS London, said: ‘CCGs must become strong, strategic and accountable bodies able to manage health budgets and prioritise resources. 

‘Much of this expertise is available within the NHS, but some support is needed from outside organisations with renowned management expertise, as was common in the past. This will enable London's NHS to keep a tight grip on performance and quality of services whilst giving clinicians the support they need to commission health services in the future.'

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, PCT,
14 Oct 2011
After circling for a year the vultures have landed. How can you seriously believe that these organisations know better than existing managers? All it shows is that the NHS is prepared to throw money away rather than to develop its own structures based on what needs to be done.

This is a disgraceful waste of public money.


PCT Finance Manager
Average (4Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Manager,
14 Oct 2011
Having come across some of the organisations mentioned in this article in a variety of guises including the loathsome "World Class Commissioning" process - I am really worried. For a rather large fee they will tell you what you should already know!

The MPET funding would have been better used improving the education and training in elderly care for example.

It will all end in tears.

Anonymous
Average (4Votes)
Top
K M Hawking, GP Partner,
14 Oct 2011
"The programme has been funded from London's Multi Professional Education and Training (MPET) budget, at a cost of £75,000 per pathfinder, plus 40p per patient. NHS London said the funding could only have been spent on the training and development of clinicians and so will not affect delivery of frontline services."
But it will affect training - and not only, apparently, in the General Practice area.

Who would have thought that CCGs are, as yet, shadows and have yet to be approved - or that NHS London will be abolished (after creating contracts lasting, I suspect, beyond their demise) which the unfortunate CCGs will be obliged to honour?
Average (3Votes)
Top
Anonymous, GP Partner,
14 Oct 2011
'CCGs must become strong, strategic and accountable bodies able to manage health budgets and prioritise resources'. What were PCTs then??
Average (2Votes)
Top
Muhammad Rahim, GP Partner,
14 Oct 2011
It's a Trojan Horse if you ask me. On the other hand we may learn something from them, who knows!
Average (2Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Manager,
15 Oct 2011
GP training budget spent on training GPs shocker...
Average (1Vote)
Top
Marie-Louise Irvine, GP Partner,
16 Oct 2011
This is just the start of the bureaucracy and waste that will mount up as the NHS is turned into a full-blown market. The idea that KPMG, McKinsey etc have any special expertise about running the health service which justifies the huge sums they charge, would be laughable if it were not so disgusting. Have we not learned the lesson from the millions wasted under labour on these consultancy firms? We could have got the necessary advice and support much more cheaply from PCT managers, many of whom were very experienced and very good. But, of course, KPMG and McKinsey et al will be employing them, charging inflated fees and profiting from it . Remember it was McKinsey who, in their recent report on how to save the NHS money, seriously proposed that GPs should have shorter consultations so they can see more patients per hour, and also recommended cutting nursing and district nursing to the levels of the least well provided areas - levelling down to cut costs and to hell with quality. It is immoral to waste NHS resources in this way. It is no defense to say the money came from the MPET budget - that money is for training health care professionals to provide better patient care, not to waste on overpriced "advice" from financial and accountancy organisations. And what on earth is the RCGP doing being involved in this? By the way, CCGs in London did not have any choice in this. The one in my locality wanted to work with ex PCT people who did have the necessary expertise but it was compulsory to go for the service arranged by NHS London.
Average (6Votes)
Top
Anonymous, PCT,
17 Oct 2011
ever get the feeling you are on an out of control runaway bus going downhill fast?

Who is going to try and get a grip with this mess?

PCT Finance Manager
Average (3Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here