This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

GPs lose grip on budgets as CCGs slide into red

By Gareth Iacobucci | 14 Dec 2011

Exclusive GPs who have taken over budgets from PCTs under the Government's NHS reforms are sliding millions into the red, according to financial assessments that lay bare the scale of the challenge facing clinical commissioning groups.

A Pulse investigation into CCG budgetary control across 55 PCTs raises questions over their capacity to constrain costs and deliver planned savings, with two-thirds of those reporting figures currently missing their financial targets.

GP commissioning leaders warned the deteriorating financial situation might force them to toughen up restrictions on referrals from practices, despite new figures showing GP referrals fell by 4% last quarter compared with a year ago.

Overall, 29% of PCTs are currently behind budget for 2011/12, with just 9% forecasting they will not meet their financial targets by April 2012.

But among 29 CCGs able to provide figures, 66% were behind budget, while four of the 20 making end-of-year forecasts said they would still be in deficit at the end of the financial year even after bringing in tough measures to catch up.

The CCG analysis included overall financial figures from NHS Cumbria, NHS Northamptonshire and NHS Cambridgeshire, where all or most budgets are already in GPs' hands. Among the worst hit areas is NHS West Sussex, where the PCT is £15m behind budget and its two CCGs £9.1m and £13.6m behind due to an overspend on acute care. The PCT said it would only meet end-of-year targets by finding a further £26m in savings, and has appointed a turnaround director.

Elsewhere, NHS Barking and Dagenham is £2m behind budget overall, with its component CCGs behind by £2.5m, £1.4m and £106,000 respectively.

GPs in commissioning hotspots NHS Cumbria and Bexley Care Trust are £714,000 and £2.2m behind target respectively due to acute over-activity. Both said they expected to meet targets by the end of the year, with Cumbria initiating a CCG-led recovery plan involving ‘a number of remedial financial measures'.

Other flagship CCGs have had more success. In NHS Northamptonshire, where Nene Commissioning has full budgetary responsibility in shadow form, the trust is currently £4.1m ahead of budget and forecasting being £7m ahead by the end of 2011/12. Bassetlaw CCG and Dudley CCG are also ahead by £325,000 and £471,000 respectively. But overall the 29 CCGs with figures are facing a net shortfall of £28m – an average of £967,000 each. Click here to find out how CCGs are faring in your area.

Dr Peter Weaving, joint chair of NHS Cumbria's clinical senate and a GP in Brampton, said the CCG had faced an ‘extreme financial challenge' and was improving the budgetary balance: ‘We don't have a referral centre but we expect individual clinicians to take responsibility and follow local guidelines, and we've got a whole shedload of things we're implementing to reduce the call on unscheduled care.'

Dr Amit Bhargava, chair of North West Sussex Commissioning Association CCG, said: ‘There will be increased pressure on CCGs to enforce more pressure. We need to create demand-led savings to ensure the need for services reduces.'

But Dr Chaand Nagpaul, GPC negotiator, said the Government's focus should be on reforming the ‘perverse' payment system which encouraged overactivity: ‘Costs are generated through modifications in coding and re-referrals.'

The Department of Health said: ‘We do not think this represents a realistic picture. The DH is ensuring organisations in deficit have recovery plans.'

Map: Find out how CCGs are faring in your area

READERS' COMMENTS

Harry Longman, Work for third sector,
14 Dec 2011
Dr Bhargava has it: demand led savings. But how to reduce patient led demand, ie self referrals to emergency care? Precisely this question led us to see how patient access could be simply transformed, so we can now answer with a specific course of action.
We have what we needed, an evidence based intervention which saves money and time for doctors, as well as CCGs, and benefits patients.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Andrew Bamji, Consultant,
14 Dec 2011
I love the concept of an overspend on acute medical care. What's the alternative? No acute medical care. Either you need it or you don't, but if you do then you had better get it, I think.

Wonderful, isn't it? GPs are overspent; hospitals are overspent; GPs can't afford to pay hospitals; hospitals fold up as the work dries up. This is not overspending but underfunding. Given that "efficiency savings" have been part of daily budgetary life in the NHS for at least the last 30 years there must be a point at which further such savings are impossible, but the NHS is beginning to resemble the oojalum bird.
Average (2Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Practice Manager,
15 Dec 2011
I pity some sufferers of chronic ailments - money led GP oriented commisioning will see the highest paying LES patients recieving the most attention - this will eat the budget and ultimately patients for example needing Anti Coaculant monitoring will be left searching high and low for someone - anyone to provide a service.

The biggest saving the NHS could make would be to stop the practice of Locum doctoring. If every practice had employed GPs the cost to the country would plummet. The cost per capita payment could be reduced and the ugly scenario of partners in practices employing locums to cover their sessions and then going off themselves to locum elswhere would end and not before time.

The cost of a a salaried GP is around £45 an hour plus 10% NIC so £50 an hour roughly for a GP on 85kish a year.
When locums are costing on average £85 an hour plus vat thats £102 an hour coming out of the coffers to cover session time.
When a partner who should be working himself employs a locum to cover his session because he can afford to do so because his 7000 list size creates plenty of money and then locums elsewhere to bump up his already large self appointed salary the cost of little johhny coming to a doctors to have a sniffle looked at becomes hideously obscene.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous, PCT,
15 Dec 2011
Dr Bamji makes some valuable comments. May I add that choice allows people to go anywhere on the choice list. Providers are receiving less money, not because there is less of it but because it is more thinly spread.

The end solution is either for someone to go belly up or (please god) someone calls time on all the unneeded extra capacity that choice brings. Same old government solution - don't bother managing something when you can introduce an 'economy' to regulate the market. The answer isn't hard but it needs a bit od courage to admit the current system is tripe.

PCT Finance Manager
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here