This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

GP contract to be rewritten to promote integrated care

By Andrew McNicoll | 10 Jan 2012

The GMS contract is set to be overhauled to incentivise GPs to provide integrated care, the Department of Health has revealed.

In its official response to the NHS Future Forum's ‘second phase' report, published today, the DH said it accepted all of the forum's recommendations including a call for integrated care to be incentivised in the GMS contract.

The DH said it would charge the NHS Commissioning Board with exploring ways of incentivising integrated care in future GMS negotiations as GPs have an ‘increasingly important role' to play in treating patients with complex needs as the NHS shifts more care to community settings.

The DH report states: ‘We welcome the recommendation that the board should promote integrative approaches to out-of-hospital care and that the board should explore how to incentivise integrated care in General Medical Services contract negotiations.'

The DH response acknowledged the NHS Future Forum's view, reported by Pulse this morning, that handing CCGs ‘multi-year' settlement budgets would allow GP commissioners the stability to commission integrated care but stopped short of giving full-backing for the move. Instead the DH argued that the level of upheaval in the NHS means ‘multi-year settlements' need to be considered once ‘new organisational structures have settled in'.

The DH report states: ‘One option the board may wish to consider in due course would be indicative multi-year settlements that could be confirmed (and altered if needs be) year-on-year. This is the current approach for local government.'

NHS Future Forum chair Professor Steve Field said: 'We are making robust and ambitious recommendations to the NHS and to Government. We have heard an enormous amount of support for the shift to patient-centred care but also frustration that this has not yet been achieved. This must now become a reality for patients across England and health and social care professionals must lead the way.'

Health secretary Andrew Lansley said: 'We are taking forward modernisation within the NHS in partnership with professional leaders from the service. I'm pleased to accept all their recommendations.'

Jo Webber, director of the NHS Confederation welcomed the focus on integration of care, but pointed out that ‘people have been talking about this for a long time'.

She said: ‘We need to be honest that, so far, integration has only been successful as a result of the efforts of unusually determined local leaders who have been prepared to take a lot of risks and swim against the tide.'

In other key developments, the DH said that CCGs will have to prove they have the ‘will and capability' to commission integrated care before being granted full statutory powers. The Department also agreed with the forum's call for PCT clusters to delegate decision-making responsibilities to local CCGs ‘as soon as possible' and said NHS managers will need to demonstrate that they are giving GP commissioners appropriate financial and staff support to run CCGs.

The DH also lent its backing to the forum's call for there to be ‘a clear presumption in favour' of hospital discharge summaries being made available to the GP and patient at the point of discharge. The DH also acknowledged the NHS Future Forum's call for GPs to be given support for the ‘financial and time burden' placed on practices by the drive to give all patients access to their records online, and said more detailed plans will be set out in their forthcoming information strategy.

The DH gave qualified support to the forum's controversial call for GPs and health professionals to ‘make every contact count' by talking to patients about their general health and lifestyle risk factors at every appointment, whatever its purpose.The report states: ‘The Government agrees that it should be the role of all healthcare workers in the NHS to make use of those contacts wherever appropriate, with the aim of improving the public's health and wellbeing and reducing health inequalities.'

When trailed in the national press, the policy was met with heavy criticism. RCGP chair Dr Clare Gerada told the Guardian the policy was ‘muddled' and warned patients would be put off if ‘lectured' by GPs, while the Patients Association claimed it could lead clinicians to ‘inappropriately badger and lecture patients each time that they see them'.

 

Watch Professor Steve Field discuss the recommendations in the NHS Future Forum report

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, GP Partner,
10 Jan 2012
How can you incentivise the impossible? There has been a progressive breakdown in integrated care by every source but GPs. Health Visitor have been moved OUT of our premises. The district nurses are grossly under-staffed and those existing are always on sick leave or courses. A Macmillan nurse hasnt been to our gold standard framework meeting for months despite ongoing request. I have no idea which Social workers cover our patch as we now have to FAX letters into the ether of social services to get any response.
Average (5Votes)
Top
Paul Conroy, Practice Manager,
10 Jan 2012
I think we need a stick, rather than more incentives. We are the ones who want integrated care - we just have no way to effect it.
Average (1Vote)
Top
Anonymous, GP Partner,
11 Jan 2012
How about incentivising the other parts of the NHS - and all the AQPs - or at the least withdrawing some of the disincentives to cooperation, let alone integration?
As far as integration of practices goes, don't forget Federations of GP Practices was Steve Fields Big Idea when in control of the RCGP: little surprise that it has become a main point in the Futures Forum reports, although I am not clear whether there is any need for this seeing the imposition of CCGs: integration between practices on a CCG-wide basis seems inevitable.
(btw, does anyone else feel that very large practices remove involvement in policy for the majority of non-executive patrners/salaried GPs? If you do, how will this pan out when not only is your practice part of a multi-county CCG but also part of a multi-practice Federation?)
Having a budget for a number of years makes sense in business terms - so that is unlikely to be approved by this or any other government - or honoured after any general election: I sometimes get the impression that the NHS - and local government - only exist in the minds of central government politicians as a means of providing sound bites and personal advancement: I do hope this is just an early morning jaundiced view of the situation!
Average (1Vote)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here