This site is intended for health professionals only
Wednesday 23 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

BMA considers GP ‘work to rule’ over pensions as lawyers help draw up list of options for industrial action

By Andrew McNicoll | 24 Jan 2012

Exclusive The BMA has begun drawing up a detailed list of options for how GPs and other doctors could take industrial action over pensions, including working to rule and non-cooperation with NHS bureaucracy, in the expectation that last-ditch talks with ministers will fail to yield concessions.

Doctors' leaders are understood to also be considering ‘working without enthusiasm' and more radical options such as offering an emergency-only service, while one BMA Council member is proposing GPs could protest by becoming ‘very cautious' and overwhelming hospitals with referrals.

The BMA's list, which will outline the pros, cons and legal implications of each option, will be presented to BMA Council at an emergency meeting on 25 February, where BMA leaders will decide whether to ballot members on the first industrial action by doctors since the 1970s.

A ballot on some form of industrial action now appears increasingly likely after health secretary Andrew Lansley refused to re-open key elements of the Government's final pensions offer and warned the threat of action would win ‘no concessions'.

His comments came in a defiant response to the release of the results of the BMA's survey of 46,000 members, which found 84% opposed the offer and two-thirds backed some form of industrial action.

Pulse understands the BMA has ruled out all-out strike action, but working to rule and a number of variants are under discussion, including boycotting form filling.

GPs who have been involved with commissioning said they were preparing to quit in protest at the pension squeeze.

Given the complications of the different contracts in different branches of medicine – for example, GP partnership law – the BMA is taking external legal advice, as well as consulting its own lawyers, to ensure any ballot on industrial action is robust and could not be derailed by a legal challenge.

A BMA source said different action by different branches of its membership remained a possibility. Any major Government concession would be likely to be put to a further vote of members, the source said.

A senior GP on BMA Council suggested doctors could refuse to ration NHS resources: ‘If someone comes in with knee pain, we don't give it time – we refer them. I wouldn't do anything that is wrong, but I could practise in a very different way to currently.'

Dr David Bailey, vice chair of the BMA's pensions committee and a GP in Cardiff, refused to speculate on the types of industrial action under discussion, but confirmed a list of options was being drawn up.

‘Those options will be placed in front of the special meeting of BMA council on 25 February,' he said. ‘At that stage – assuming the Government, which seems highly likely, refuses to re-open negotiations – we will have to take a decision on whether or not we ballot.'

BMA chair Dr Hamish Meldrum – who will shortly meet Mr Lansley for crunch talks – said ‘the strength and scale of feeling among doctors is abundantly clear', but insisted industrial action remained a ‘last resort'.

But BMA sources were downbeat on the prospect of ministers changing their stance, after health secretary Andrew Lansley said the ‘heads of agreement' document that sets out the Government's ‘final position' on pensions would not be subject to further negotiation.

‘What Mr Lansley's basically saying is: "This is what we're offering and it isn't going to get any better",' the source told Pulse.

Dr Sunil Sapre, a GP in Liverpool, said the BMA's decision to draw up plans for industrial action was the ‘right decision in the interests of the profession'.

He added: ‘Now make sure the action hurts the Government but not patients.'

 

The road to a BMA ballot

19 Dec 2011: Ministers table final pensions offer

5 Jan 2012: BMA polls 130,000 members on final offer

18 Jan 2012: BMA rejects pensions offer after poll finds 84% opposed to deal

Next few days: BMA chair to meet Andrew Lansley for  talks

Next few weeks: BMA draws up options for industrial action

25 Feb 2012: BMA Council due to hold emergency meeting to discuss ballot

READERS' COMMENTS

Anonymous, GP Partner,
24 Jan 2012
The Newspapers should be reporting on the GREEDY PRIVATE GPs who work in London in clinics that charge £220 for a consultation and who live in multi-million pound houses-but since these money-grabbing GPs are friends of the media thugs, I doubt that will happen. I know of one arrogant and greedy private GP that has the audacity to slag off NHS GPs who earn a fraction of his greedy income. When will these hypocrites be taken on-it seems that they are too powerful to challenge..........
Average (1Vote)
Top
Michele Cameron, Other GP,
24 Jan 2012
I wonder whether it would be possible to show in simple terms how much money is currently contributed to pensions by the different crafts and then show how much that money would be worth if properly [in a risk averse manner] invested with modest returns.
This would very clearly highlight the daylight robbery that is planned.
In fact the above is ACTUALLY irrelevant as the pension that we signed up to is deferred pay and so should be sacrosanct UNLESS the government [I am a dyed in the wool conservative normally] is willing to admit that it is an extra INCOME TAX on public sector workers and then try to explain that.
Average (2Votes)
Top
Anonymous, PCT,
24 Jan 2012
Many might say that the vagaries of the nGMS contract and GP's interpretation of it suggest that they have been working to rule for some years.
Average (4Votes)
Top
Vinci Ho, GP Partner,
24 Jan 2012
There has to be a well calculated , strategic and effective plan.
The aim is to test the boundary of the law so as to hurt the government but not our patients .
Yes , we will be up against a lot of criticism but it is more importantly about the future of general practice in this country..........
Average (1Vote)
Top
Anonymous, Working for a GP Consortium,
24 Jan 2012
Good intentions but bad timing.
With civil servants, one could claim many were earning a standard £25,000 salary.
The 99% will find it hard to sympathise with GPs, in this climate, no matter how strong your case, simply because they will equate GPs with the 1%.

This action has the potential to really damage the profession in the long term. After this, privatisation will seem like a good option. Be careful what you wish for ....
Average (2Votes)
Top
Roger Neal, GP Partner,
24 Jan 2012
I dont care a damn what other professionals think and I dont want sympathy. I want the pension that I 'sort of' agreed to in 2008.
Average (3Votes)
Top
Charlotte Ferriday, GP Partner,
23 Feb 2012
in response to Anonymous working for a GP consortium: You are perpetuating Government spin please look at the true facts:
The NHS scheme is self funding and pays £2bn net to the government i.e. AFTER all pensions have been paid out (effectively we are paying even more tax) and it is sustainable since the 2008 changes. THAT IS THE POINT! We work hard- I do about 30 hours per week in total etc as a half time GP. We have to have specialist knowledge and be good at costeffective management. Our job is hard to do well.
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Is self-care the answer to the NHS efficiency drive? Read the full story here