This site is intended for health professionals only
Thursday 24 May 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Managers block NICE approval of warfarin alternative over cost

By Nigel Praities | 21 Feb 2012

PCT managers have appealed against a NICE appraisal of the oral anticoagulant dabigatran, claiming the guidance will have ‘one of the largest impacts on the NHS to date'.

Dabigatran is the first in a number of new drugs to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, but managers at NHS Salford have blocked its approval on the NHS by submitting an appeal that says safety data on the drug is ‘limited' and NICE estimates of its cost are unrealistic.

The drug is a likely alternative to warfarin treatment in many patients, with the NICE appraisal approving dabigatran for patients with atrial fibrillation patients after a previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack, and in patients aged 65 years or older with diabetes, hypertension or cardiovascular disease.

The results of an appeal hearing – held earlier this month – are yet to be released, but documents submitted in advance by NHS Salford accuse NICE of ‘exceeding its powers' and argue its proposals would require ‘significant anticoagulant service redesign' that would be required quickly.

A letter from NHS Salford reads: ‘The NICE costing template models a 20% uptake of dabigatran amongst the eligible population at five years. We and other PCTs consider this to be unrealistic and local networks estimate a higher and more rapid uptake, with more than 300,000 patients opting for dabigatran.'

‘The recommendations made in the technology appraisal will potentially have one of the largest impacts on the NHS of any NICE FAD published to date.'

The result of the appeal hearing will be sent to NICE for consideration in 15 days.

 

 

 

 

READERS' COMMENTS

Peter Elton, Other healthcare professional,
27 Feb 2012
As the person who led the appeal on behalf of NHS Salford, we made very clear that we were very keen that dabigatran should be offered to patients with a CHADS2 score of 2 or more who, when on warfarin, could not stay within the target range for 60% of the time. We did argue that on both effectiveness and costs, that warfarin should be offered first rather than all patients offered dabigatran from the outset. We certinly did not want a blanket block on dabigatran.

Dr Peter Elton
DPH
NHS Bury
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Will online booking ease the 8am rush?Read the full story here