This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Labour: Non-partnership models needed to secure future of general practice

The Labour Party has given the most detail yet about its plans for general practice should gain power at the next election, at a set-piece speech to delegates at the Pulse Live conference.

Speaking to delegates, shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth announced a £500m infrastructure fund dedicated to primary care as part of a proposal to spend £5bn a year on the NHS, via a tax rise for the top 5% of earners.

He pledged that general practice would see a rising proportion of the NHS budget - a promise the current Government has yet to achieve.

He acknowledged the ‘intolerable pressures’ that GPs are under, adding that a Labour government would ‘honour the commitment’ to recruit an extra 5,000 GPs - which he pointed out the Government is 'far from being on track' to achieve - looking at how it 'can make general practice more attractive to medical students’.

Mr Ashworth also said Labour would 'explore options with you for the future of the contract and the future of the [QOF] which I think many agree hasn’t delivered as hoped for'.

In a speech spanning a wealth of topics - his first substantive speech on general practice - Mr Ashworth also said Labour would support a widening of the salaried GP workforce.

He said: ‘We support the partnership model where it works and can recruit but equally we are aware that large parts of the country are indeed struggling to recruit GPs.

‘We don’t believe in a one size fits all solution so instead I want to work with GPs to develop models for the future including salaried GP models.’

And he promised Labour would not pursue the Government’s quest for seven-day opening, billing the directive ‘unrealistic’ when ‘the capacity simply isn’t there to deliver it’.

Mr Ashworth said said Labour is ‘is prepared to take the tough decisions for the long term sustainability of the NHS’ by making ‘different choices on levels of taxation’.

Asked where the money was coming from, Mr Ashworth said: ‘We are going to put up tax for the top 5% of earners, the very wealthiest of society, we will ask them to pay more tax.

‘We think the state of the NHS is such that it needs significant levels of investment, and my hunch is that the British public would broadly support increasing taxes to the very wealthiest of society if the yield from that taxation goes to fund the national health service.'

And, as part of plans to support a diminishing practice nurse workforce, he said Labour will reinstate the nurse training bursary which the current Government scrapped, and announced an upcoming review into the primary care workforce to be led by shadow minister for community care Julie Cooper.

On the overall boost to funding, Mr Ashworth said: ‘Given how central primary care is to our future vision of the NHS, absolutely key to our ambitions to tackling ill health and wider heath inequalities in society, general practice will get its fair share of this investment too.’

Readers' comments (15)

  • So essentially Labour will be taxing existing GPs more to pay for more GPs on lower salaries who then in turn will pay more tax.....nice....will definitely help with retention....not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't think many Gp's will be in the top 5% of earners anymore ,due to years of pay cuts compared with our legal/dental/accountants peers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • £100k and above is the top 2% of earners. Most full-time partners I know are well above this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Everyone uses the health service so how about everyone pays? A tax increase that covers everyone. If it’s only the top 5% that are paying it’s not going to help the FATPOA that already exists.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nice spin. Tax us more to lower the asking salaries of GPs. The UK does not value doctors. Any students with good grades will now go somewhere else like the banking industry.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • £70,000 = Top 5%
    This will affect not only GP's but also consultants in general

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Ha ha ha
    Apart from taxing the so called top 5% earners (without details) , most of the policies are just we are talking about on this platform day in day out.
    Pretty sure , many politician aides are monitoring Pulse website every f***ing day.
    But as I wrote before , the question is whether this could raise the fear factor on the prime minister and her government , serving the 'function' of an opposition party .
    Cannot see the prospect of an earlier general election than 2022 at this stage.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctoring only makes sense as a part time job for 2nd earners nowadays given the hourly take home rate compared to alternatives available to those with the skills to get into medicine.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Looking at adverts for employed gp on this site
    Most less than 9k a session =83k gross
    I was a partner for 23 years and did not exceed this
    Non of my children gone to med school
    Why?
    Come on accept
    Work to death gcse,a level,medical school
    Post graduate etc
    Not to mention what when nhs gives you a job you hassle involved

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Maverick

    "This is going to hurt".
    Secret diaries of a junior doctor
    By Adam Kay.
    Essential reading for those currently practising in the NHS and those considering offering themselves up for sacrifice. Please ask your children to read this before applying to medical school....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say