Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Axing practice boundaries will harm patients

While the Department of Health plans to abolish practice boundaries may seem a popular diversion and a potential vote winner, it seems to miss the point that one of the prime functions of a GP is to care for sick and disabled people, many of whom cannot travel and for whom efficient medical care requires detailed and personal knowledge.

(Scrapping of boundaries to create 'two-tier' GP care)

This job cannot possibly be done properly for non-local patients.

It also fails to recognise that patients may have chosen a non-local doctor for whatever reason, may then become ill and unable to travel and then unexpectedly require this local service.

This policy will appeal to the worried well at the expense of the unwell and their carers. Do patients really believe that the primary role of their GP is to practise this supermarket-style of medicine?

I challenge the Government to launch a similar consultation concerning the election of MPs. Wouldn't it be a good idea if we could vote for whichever candidate we liked across the whole country? We could then anticipate where the marginal seats are and really make our vote count.

Would this be good democracy? I think not, and neither are the Government proposals going to encourage good medicine.

From Dr Nicholas Brown
Chippenham, Wiltshire

Rate this article 

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Have your say