This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Dilemma: Hospital sends patient for pre-op MRSA screening

GP and medicolegal experts advise what to do when a patient is unusually sent to you for pre-operative MRSA screening

A patient awaiting a hip replacement attends the practice to request MRSA screening – normally done in hospital. But you find the service has been stopped and patients are being sent to their GP. Your partners insist this is not a core service – what do you do?

Dr Sam Creavin duo

GP partner view: Check if screening comes under an enhanced service

Do you have the energy to push back against this workload shift, or will you agree to the request so the patient can get the operation that they have been waiting for in pain? GPs have no requirement under core PMS or GMS to deliver MRSA screening, but the practice manager should check there is no obligation under a local enhanced service or similar arrangement.

If not, government guidelines on MRSA screening indicate the onus is on the hospital, and the remuneration tariff for payment by results includes preoperative assessment.1,2 Trusts have an additional incentive to screen because they may be fined for cases of MRSA bacteraemia3 and indeed a post-infection review may be required.4

Given the importance of getting all this right, there is an argument that the work should be carried out by the specialist service that is remunerated for doing it.

Your decision may set a precedent for the practice, so try to reach an agreement with your partners. If you decide not to offer the screening then it’s important to observe the GMC’s Good Medical Practice. Paragraph 44 states that ‘you must contribute to the safe transfer of patients between healthcare providers’ and 46 that ‘you must be polite and considerate’.5 The BMA template letters for resisting workload shift may also help.6

You might decide to ask your LMC to take up the matter with the CCG and work with the trust to reach a solution.

Dr Sam Creavin is a GP partner in Thornbury, South Gloucestershire

dr john allingham crop

LMC view: Refuse the work collectively

The core principle of the GMS contract is ‘treat those who are ill or believe themselves to be ill’ and the provision of pre-op MRSA screening does not meet this criterion.7 This work sits with secondary care.

It is important that the partnership takes a unified approach and pushes back together, because if one GP agrees to do the work word will go round and divide and rule with prevail.

Politely refer the patient back to the specialist. Contact the orthopaedic commissioner via the CCG to ask whether they have authorised a change in the provision of the service. If they have, an enhanced service should be commissioned to ensure the work is funded and completed to an agreed specification.

You should inform your LMC so it can collate issues from any similarly affected practices and represent all in negotiations with CCGs and hospital trusts to ensure this transfer of work either stops or is funded.

You must also consider the needs of the patient and share information. Apologising to them for the inconvenience and copying them in on correspondence may gain you their shared understanding and even support.

You could also share this with the practice’s Patient Participation Group as an example of work that diverts appointments from sick patients.

Dr John Allingham is medical secretary at Kent LMC

Roopinder Brar duo

Medicolegal view: Ensure your patient’s care is not compromised

It is unfortunate that clear communication between the hospital and GP has apparently not occurred. The hospital should have consulted local primary care teams before stopping the service to discuss the feasibility of redirecting patients to primary care for MRSA screening.

That said, while GPs may not view MRSA screening as a core service, the patient’s care should not be compromised by the hospital’s decision. Both hospital and GP should understand their duties and work together to provide care to this patient, which in this case may mean the GP does the screening. This might seem to be just another thing on the GP’s plate, but not carrying out the screening could delay the procedure, cause additional pain or discomfort and may lead to increased consultations with the GP or prescription medications.

The GP can still relay concerns to the hospital that the primary care team is unable to offer an MRSA screening service long term. You may also want to discuss the matter with the BMA for advice about contractual obligations.

Dr Roopinder Brar is a practising GP and medical adviser at MDDUS


1 Department of Health. Implementation of modified admission MRSA screening guidance for NHS. 2014.

2 NHS England and NHS Improvement. 2017/18 and 2018/19 National Tariff Payment System

3 NHS England. NHS Standard Contract 2017/18 and 2018/19 Technical Guidance 

4 NHS England. Update on the reporting and monitoring arrangements and post-infection review process for MRSA bloodstream infections

5 GMC. Good Medical Practice. 2013

6 BMA. NHS England standard hospital contract guidance 2017-19

1 UK Government. Standard GMS Contract. 2013 



Related images

  • hn01 bm

Rate this article  (1.33 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (7)

  • Once again, utterly nonsensical advice from the defence organisation ......
    This is the responsibility of secondary care ........if the operation is cancelled because of lack of MRSA screening this is DOWN TO THE HOSPITAL.....nothing to do with the GP
    GPs are swamped already and have absolutely no capacity to take on additional work without additional resources

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whilst the Gp is listening to Dr Brar's advice and is setting up a bespoke MRSA testing, result checking and result sending service for this hospital patient, a poorly controlled asthmatic can't get an appointment to review their preventers and decides to leave it until after Christmas to see the GP...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dilemna:
    'You are an indemnity provider medical advisor and the number of queries allocated to you doubles. This requires twice as much work to do safely but your employer is refusing to pay you for this.
    Do you:
    1. Do your best for the doctors and do double the workload for a 'little bit' until your polite emails lead to your employer paying you for your work
    2. Tell your employer you can only safely do so much work in your allocated time and it's their responsibility to find someone to do the extra work.'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bad luck! Whichever route you follow here lands you with a load more work and grief, and you'll still be sitting in your lonely room at 9pm

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Azeem Majeed

    The advice from the MDDUS medico-legal adviser Dr Roopinder Brar does not make any sense. The responsibility for pre-operative MRSA screening relies with the provider carrying out the operation. The hospital can’t stop doing this screening unilaterally and try to shift the work onto general practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • defence organisation fronts an idiot as usual

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is the operating teams responsibility. End of. I dont think a hospital would stop screening for MRSA for their orthopaedic patients. Has this happened anywhere in the UK?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say