This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Dilemma: Partner reacts aggressively to workload ‘dumping’

Three experts outline how you should respond if a partner reacts aggressively to perceived workloading ‘dumping’

One of our partners has been rude and aggressive to consultants verbally and in writing over perceived workload ‘dumping’. How should we proceed?

dr grant ingrams 330x330px

Dr Grant Ingrams: Be aware that consultants are not always to blame

Workload ‘dumping’ – the inappropriate passing of work from secondary to primary care – is a significant ongoing problem for every GP. Examples include hospitals bouncing patients back to their GP if they fail to attend a secondary care appointment, expecting GPs to sign patients off from work after surgery and providing inadequate discharge medication. From personal experience, an average of two to three appointments are lost per GP each day to unresourced secondary care work.

The BMA highlighted this inappropriate non-funded workload in its Quality First campaign.1 NHS England has recognised the problem, and has made changes to the NHS standard contract to stop hospitals offloading work onto GPs.2

That said, it’s important to remember that while a minority of consultants act as though GPs are their community house officers, sometimes problems arise because hospitals have poor training or inadequate processes. Consultant colleagues report it can be impossible to find Med3 forms, or they have draconian restrictions on access to hospital prescription forms. We should also be mindful that not every patient-reported request from a consultant is true.

GPs also need to ensure they always comply with the GMC’s Good Medical Practice, which requires doctors to work collaboratively and to treat colleagues fairly and with respect.3

The practice manager or another partner should therefore have an informal discussion with the GP. It will also be important to ask whether the GP is reacting this way because of illness, excessive workload, or burnout.

To help all GPs resist inappropriate workload more effectively, the practice should develop a central process to deal with it. Find out if the LMC or CCG has a process for reporting complaints and write to the trust medical director and chief executive, the local MP and the CCG about ongoing issues.

Dr Grant Ingrams is a GP in Leicestershire

Dr Farah Jameel

Dr Farah Jameel: Have policies and templates in place

A significant amount of GPs’ time could be freed up if they did not have to rearrange hospital appointments and chase test results. While the partner is right to challenge unresourced workload shift, a rude and aggressive approach needs to be reconsidered. The GMC’s advice on working collaboratively is helpful for this specific scenario.3

It is certainly worth having a practice meeting to discuss the partner’s approach. Everyone deserves to be treated with respect; rude and aggressive behaviour is not justifiable under any circumstances. The practice should seek to explore and understand the reasons behind this behaviour.

The practice as a unit could consider developing a policy to push back on inappropriate hospital requests that breach the standard contract. Ensure all GPs in the practice are aware of the new hospital standards2, and use the BMA Quality First templates4, or an equivalent of your own, on each occasion that a hospital fails to meet them. Embed the templates into your clinical system for automated use; your CCG IT lead could help. Keep a record of all breaches and notify the CCG and LMC so they can raise this issue on your behalf.

Good organisation of care across the interface between general practice and secondary care is crucial in ensuring patients receive high-quality care and the best use is made of NHS resources. This is reinforced in NHS guidance for hospital clinicians and managers.5

Dr Farah Jameel is GPC England executive lead for workload

dollman square

Medicolegal view: Consider patient safety first

From a medicolegal point of view, we would have concerns if the partner’s actions adversely affected patient safety. If, for example, the partner failed to action secondary care requests this would be a serious breach of his duty to patients and might result in a referral to the GMC.

Likewise, rudeness, aggressive behaviour and a lack of respect in clinical teams can compromise patient safety and add to the risk of complaints.

Addressing conflict can be a daunting process but if you believe patient safety is at risk, it’s important to deal with it early and seek the support of other colleagues.

The GMC has made it clear that doctors have a duty to take steps when they have concerns about a colleague’s fitness to practise.6

It is important to look at the events as objectively as possible. Are the concerns shared by other members of the team?

It would be worthwhile to then discuss the issue directly with your partner. Difficulties can arise if the colleague fails to acknowledge the concerns, and refuses to engage in local intervention. If concerns about the GP are genuinely held, supported by adequate evidence, further steps are then necessary. The GMC guidance states that in such

cases, ‘it may be appropriate to raise it outside the practice – for example, with the medical director or clinical governance lead responsible for your organisation’.5

Ensure you keep records of your concerns and any steps you have taken. The GMC states that doctors will be able to justify raising a concern even if they are mistaken, provided they do so on the basis of reasonable belief and through appropriate channels.

Dr Greg Dollman is a medical adviser at MDDUS


1 BMA, 2015. Quality first: managing workload to deliver safe patient care

2 NHS Standard Contract 2017-19.

3 GMC, 2013. Good Medical Practice. Working collaboratively with colleagues. Paragraphs 35-38.

4 BMA. Quality first templates.

5 NHS England and partners, 2017. The interface between primary and secondary care: key messages for NHS clinicians and managers.

6 GMC, 2012. Raising and acting on concerns about patient
















Related images

  • f0025371 general practitioner spl (1)

Rate this article  (1.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (26)

  • Cobblers

    "If the partner failed to action secondary care requests this would be a serious breach of his duty to patients and might result in a referral to the GMC".

    Sorry Dr FJ this is unacceptable.

    To say what you have said above shows complete lack of understanding of the problem. A secondary care dump becomes your responsibility if accepted. If bounced back with alacrity and a modicum of politeness it is not your problem. If harms comes to the patient then it is the responsibility of the originator of the dump.

    I am aware that the secondary sector is unable to respond with speed but that is their problem not yours.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry Greg, but it's time that the legal types get a grip (and I'm including you in that description). If you organise a test/perform an operation/prescribe a drug then you take full culpability. Treating GPs as 'community house officers' is unacceptable in all forms and should be so in law. I am personally sick and tired of having to make excuses for the failures of secondary care admin. The April 2017 standard contract worked.... for about 2 months, then it was back to 'speak to your GP'. I now hand out cards with the local PALS number on it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Sorry Dr FJ I meant Dr GD.

    COI easily confused.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The systemic dumping of work is a massive unrelenting persistent clinical danger - if consultants dump work they are accepting there is a % failure rate of the dump and accepting the certainty that clinical errors will occur.

    That the error rate is lower is only because GPs are doing this work late into the evening, fueled by paranoia of the triple threat of civil suits, GMC barring and going to prison for manslaughter.

    The 'dump' itself is the rudest part of the process.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    What a load of crap. I’m 100% behind the rude and aggressive GP. Anyone else sick of being nice?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    Sick of lawyers and legal bullshite, nothing but over paid parasites turning the whole world into unworkable administrative stodge primarily for their own benefit. Toss and bull to the lot of them. Cry out for the revolution comrades, break off the shackles and stick it to the man.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ......It will also be important to ask whether the GP is reacting this way because of illness, excessive workload, or burnout.......

    Superb! Great response. It's not a grossly underfunded general practice or NHS to blame, no, it must be the GP who 'has the problem'

    Good on him/her for getting angry, it's about time someone showed some backbone, because our 'leaders' sure as hell don't!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nothing wrong at all with appropriate aggression.
    I have very frequently been led down garden paths by lazy and incompetent hospital departments over the years, and become angry as a result.
    We are human, not robots, and are allowed to have feelings and opinions, and to express them.
    I feel for this GP and would support him.
    Idiots in ivory towers should try being a GP and see how it feels when you are an hour late trying to get a psychotic patient assessed on a Friday evening and no one is answering.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Azeem Majeed

    I published a teaching aid on the NHS Standard Contract.

    There is also a linked paper.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • doctordog.

    I’m also with the doctor who becomes aggressive due to secondary care laziness, incompetence and stupidity. This behaviour is a symptom of poor secondary care working practises, so experts, concentrate your attention on this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say