This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

The real conspiracy of NHS England

Dr Nishma Manek

That got your attention, didn’t it? Perhaps a story has crystallised in your mind already.

We all knew it. The government and NHS England have been plotting to systematically destroy general practice. With sympathetic nods and public-facing pledges to try harder, they’ve been taking back our contracts – only to throw them in the fire when our backs are turned, gleefully stroking beards as they watch plumes of smoke erupt from their ivory towers.

It’s a seductive story isn’t it?

But it’s fake news. As a trainee and avid follower of the headlines, I shared these concerns. But I’ve spent the last year as a clinical fellow in NHS England, and I’ve been searching for some hint of conspiracy to destroy general practice.

I expect to get a kicking for this, but I want to lay out some truths. As is often the case, the truth makes for far less juicy reading, so do feel free to switch to Trump’s Twitter feed.

You see, I’ve dispelled some myths of my own this year. I’ve found no hidden agenda to destroy the partnership model. There’s no secret plan to sell us off as salaried slaves to super-partnerships, or knock us down so hungry hospitals can devour us whole. They’re not lying through disingenuous teeth when they say, ‘if general practice fails, the NHS fails’.

They don’t always get it right. They know that a glossy plan won’t matter if it’s not felt in our consulting rooms. But far from being soulless zombies working at the whim of politicians, I can now see they’ve got some of the toughest gigs in the profession.

They don’t have the ability to take to the airwaves, point fingers, and rally the troops with cries for more resources. Or the everyday ‘thank you’s from patients that help us to persevere when tasked with the impossible. And any positive progress or deflected problems often slip under the radar.

But having internalised the same passion we have for shoring up general practice, they toil on. They walk tight ropes in a way that I couldn’t have imagined. And knowing that we’ll never feel like it’s happening fast enough, or going far enough, to keep ahead of rising demand.

Pulling back the curtain, I can now appreciate the delicacy and complexity of the constraints they work within. We’re living through unprecedented political instability, with no ‘magic money’ tree to shake, huge pressures on primary care, and plummeting professional morale. So those sweet spots of where change needs to happen, that seem so glaringly obvious from the outside, are smaller than we might think.

But if you look at the headlines, you’d struggle to believe there’s anything positive happening at all.

Across the world, fake news is having a moment. It feels like we’re increasingly prioritising the deceptively simple over the honestly complex, the visceral over the rational, and making judgements based on summaries of summaries.

Our declining deference to experts, rising scorn for the political establishment, and tendency to lock ourselves in social media echo chambers where opinions are confirmed with breath-taking confidence, rather than challenged, are increasingly blurring the lines between fact and fiction. And the less attention we pay to facts, the more ‘non-facts’ are being deployed.

I’m beginning to worry that general practice is heading down the same path. Doctors are often discerning when it comes to assessing evidence. We remember those lovely funnel plots from medical school, and we’re quick to spot publication bias. But do we apply the same diligent consideration to the headlines in general practice?

Chronic, unfocussed criticism, generalised and amplified in echo chambers, is harmful. And I think we’re at risk of tipping the balance. There’s a sense that it’s now being embedded in the psyche of the profession, spilling over to our trainees, and subtly altering perceptions of our career, at a time when we need them more than ever before.

Criticism is like our body’s inflammatory response to injury. When it’s acute and targeted, it’s helpful. It signals where the insult is so a response can be deployed. But when that inflammation becomes chronic and self-perpetuating, it can cause lasting damage- and damage that continues long after the original insult has been dealt with.

I think this matters. Because there’s a fine line between passionately defending our profession, and inadvertently being part of the problem. And there are consequences of crossing that line. At best, nothing changes, and we’ll continue to wallow in our collective sea of cynicism. But at worse, we drown in a spiral of negativity and, worst of all, deny others the privilege of joining our field in the process.

And those repercussions will continue long after today’s headlines wrap tomorrow’s fish and chips.

Dr Nishma Manek is a GP trainee in London and is the national medical director’s clinical fellow at NHS England

Related images

  • Dr Nishma Manek-JonEnoch June2017 3x2 Duo BLOG

Rate this article  (2.55 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (57)

  • Nhsfatcat

    If there is no conspiracy then NHSE are like a chef who can burn boiled eggs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If this post was designed to help us "see the light" then it has had the reverse effect on me.
    Personally, I am bloody sick to death of being "told what to think and do" by those with grandiose and inflated egos. As far as I am concerned intelligent professionals should be "allowed" to come to their own conclusions rather than fed others views-so thanks but no thanks.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The facts on the ground do not reflect the views shared in this article.
    Always the blame lying with the old mantra of increase in population. It's bollocks. That is a small part of it but the constant pace of change; money Diverted away from core / basic services into Revalidation; new teams and non evidenced half ideas and no one seemingly just stopping to learn lessons from failed debarcles ( various IT programmes). No one listening or believing the experts. That's the real problem.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have a friend who has worked several levels higher than yourself in NHSE for many years, they categorically define that there has been a conspiracy by the treasury to defund and impoverish general practice since 2005, this is completely intentional with no thought to the consequences for the NHS, despite warnings from NHSE - and not something that NHSE has been able to alter, the same individual states categorically "We know general practice and the partnership model is dying, its not that we are letting it happen, we're just not saving it".
    I trust this individual to be honest with me as I've known them for years and they have nothing to gain from this disclosure.
    So if NHSE are standing by and watching general practice die, they are guilty of neglect, and if they publicly have accepted the treasury stance on gp income and resource, they are guilty of colluding in the demise of a profession, and possibly ultimately the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The background:-

    https://www.fmlm.ac.uk/programme-services/individual-support/national-medical-directors-clinical-fellow-scheme

    https://www.fmlm.ac.uk/nishma-manek

    I wonder if you are media and politically savvy, using what you describe to attract our attention in one of the means of communication to Primary Care which in my career experience consistently provides a fuel to negativity.

    Typically, exploring the background to the headline reveals a different story, just like here.

    The other comments here also reveal the effect of NHS behaviours on how those at the front line of Primary Care now feel. Surely cause for grave concern?

    I am passionate about Primary Care and have been through my career (nearly at an end - thank goodness you say!) and have recently found the TED talk "Start with Why" followed by the unabridged audiobook an enormous help with the feelings of negativity which you describe. It may help others.

    I respect your right to have an opinion, but wonder if you are exploring the realities in Primary Care which are producing the loss of morale, inability to recruit, some of the negative behaviours becoming more prevalent (or exposed by the pressures) - and before those who wish to comment say "we do not have a problem" - look ahead to a possible situation of clinicians not there due to retirement, illness, etc.

    Happy to explore this further.

    IntraHealth Parkgate Surgery

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Azeem Majeed

    Thank you for your article Nishma. I notice that many of the people who have criticised you are unwilling to give their real names.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tom Caldwell

    No problem giving my real name. You are of course right that there is no conspiracy. It is simply open Tory policy and opportunism.

    There is no way that chopping pensions, reducing budgets and staffing, clustering into nice convenient sized chunks and aligning IT systems to mine information usable by private providers could in anyway be preparing general practice for larger providers to swoop in with APMS contracts.

    There is no way that the NHS is becoming simply a brand under which large private providers are picking off what they see as the juicy profitable bits.

    There is no way for example that these larger groupings could ever be changed to a cheaper to provide GP lead not delivered service... oh no. Nothing in the direction of travel suggests this at all.

    As to how much access I have to insider info, probably a little bit less than you. As to how much you have, only you can answer that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry Nishma, I'm with DT.
    Some would politely say that 'there are none so blind as those that cannot see', others might suggest 'what else would you expect from someone who has clearly invested in partisanship'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hi Nish. Don't normally head below the line myself, but couldn't let the Prof's straw man about all dissenters being anonymous stand so as someone whose stock-in-trade is whinging about the powers that be, here's my chronic unfocussed two cents.

    Let's be honest, this article never had a hope of hitting the fabled 5 stars, but it already has you drowning in plaudits from what Pev might call the wider Morlock community, so swings and roundabouts eh.

    I do think you make some valid points. Of course the people you work with in NHS England are not evil, just as my appraiser is not evil, my CQC inspector was not (provably) evil, and the U-boat Kapitänleutnant in Das Boot isn't evil. They're all normal people trying to do the best they can in tough jobs. But that doesn't mean that their actions and the system they support have a benign effect on us ordinary working GPs; quite the opposite. (Except the U-boat guy, on whom the jury is still out).

    There's a reason we're in a spiral of negativity. In the ten years since I was a GP trainee like you virtually every aspect of the job has got worse. That ain't fake news, it's just a statement of fact, easily backed up by looking at the stats on GP workload, GP pay, indemnity costs, numbers of applicants for jobs and so on. I'm sorry-not-sorry if my response to this is criticism of the forces I perceive to be worsening the situation, whether through malice or ineptitude. But the idea that my criticism is now a bigger problem than the *actual problem* is just daft, frankly.

    "Why are you retiring/quitting/moving to Australia?"
    "Well, my job is fine. In fact, I couldn't be happier. But I keep reading in the papers that GP is bad so I thought I'd better get out". SAID NO ONE EVER.

    I don't know if NHS England can make the job better. I don't believe they go into work each day to actively try and make it worse. But that's what keeps happening anyway. So here's some targeted inflammation for you; tell your BFFs at NHS England that if they really want to Make General Practice Great Again they should take all the five year forward view money and put it directly into the global sum. Nothing puts bums on seats like cold hard cash.

    In the meantime I will continue to call it as I see it. There is a great British tradition of therapeutic grumbling in times of adversity; it's not chronic inflammation, it's catharsis. And without catharsis you know what you end up being full of.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say