This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

The waiting game

Hooray! The NHS has freed up time we’re forced to waste elsewhere


copperfield duo 1500x1000px

In the same way that tomorrow never comes, it seems that the View to which we have all been looking Forward is, in fact, the horizon: a destination we’ll never get to.

Yes, OK, the ‘Time for Care’ scheme from NHS England’s GP Forward View has borne fruit, apparently freeing up 121,000 hours of clinical time, although this neatly overlooks the 121,001 hours of box-ticking it took for GPs to negotiate the scheme.

And, true, it briefly felt like we really could bounce back bouncebacks and deflect the DNA letters showered on us by hospitals using the rough, tough BMA template letters. Until, that is, the hospitals decided to laugh collectively in our face and CCGs decided to ignore the whole thing, since when it’s been workload-dumping business as usual.

But there was one Forward View pledge that really got my juices flowing and which, unless I’ve somehow been in a coma for the past two years, seems to have been filed quietly under ‘Let’s pretend it never happened’.

This neatly overlooks the 121,001 hours of box-ticking it took to negotiate the scheme

I’ll give you a clue. This past couple of weeks, a number of things happened, and here are some highlights:

• We’ve just heard that, because of a ‘software issue’, the CQRS system is not picking up codes for flu jabs given to certain at-risk groups. The solution is: a) we have to do a retrospective system search to ‘prove’ what we’ve done thus far to validate payment for any shortfall; and b) we will have to do some extra prospective coding for these patients to justify payments we’d otherwise miss in the future.

• Because of a ‘software issue’, our electronically transmitted lab results are not being coded properly, thereby screwing QOF targets for cholesterol and HbA1c. The solution is that we will have to search for all patients affected, then enter the data manually, otherwise we lose mega QOF bucks.

• The alignment of QOF with SNOMED codes, which we were previously told would cause no QOF problems, is very likely to cause QOF problems. I don’t know the reason for this, though my guess is it will be a ‘software issue’ and I don’t know the solution, either, but I do know it will involve GPs, time and pain.

You’ve possibly guessed what I’m driving at but just in case, here’s what the Forward View had to say about ‘streamlining of payment processes for practices’ and the ‘feasibility of a single payment vehicle’: ‘It is unacceptable for hard-pressed practices to have to waste time chasing or recording payments.’

Unless the current view is that the 121,000 hours of freed-up time means we’re no longer hard-pressed – and therefore wasting time chasing or recording payments is now, in fact, completely acceptable (and I wouldn’t put it past them) – then, yes, it is indeed unacceptable. It’s also unfair, time-consuming and demeaning.

This leaves us with two certainties. One being that, by the time I finish this sentence suggesting that by the time I finish this sentence something else will have gone wrong with the payment system, something else will have gone wrong with the payment system. And the other being that absolutely sod-all is being done about it.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex

Related images

  • copperfield duo 1500x1000px
coronavirus john lewis vouchers 180x250px v2

Rate this article  (4.89 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (3)

  • Spot on Tony as always. Remember 2004? “No more bean counting”

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well said Tony. It is not a surprise to most experienced GPs. There is no real will to make things better for GPs. Just dishonest ways of making us work and not pay. Like time limited depression reviews and the old obesity QoF. The current tax structure is complicated and speaks volumes of smoke and mirrors to con people. I am following the accountants advice not to work harder or do more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    I'm still waiting for the High Trust Low Bureaucracy Contract we accepted in 2004......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say