This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Debate: Do practices have a duty to support locums during the pandemic?

Two GPs share their perspectives on practices' duty to support locums during this period 

YES - Locums have helped practices in their time of need

dr jha

After becoming a locum due to personal circumstances, I had chosen a lower rate in return for regular sessions at a local practice. This worked well until 13 March, when I developed full-blown Covid-19 symptoms. I had been consulting without any PPE.

Despite requests to organise work from home, my practice did not employ me to do so. Overnight, I found myself unemployed and unwell, and then I was asked to shield (due to brittle asthma).

Not all locums are in my position, but many would have their own stories. Locum groups with daily shift offerings fell silent. The only shifts left were high-risk – patient facing with minimal PPE, even as calls went out for retired doctors and medical students to help the NHS. The biggest irony came when my retired doctor parents were asked to return and offered remote working options.

We know NHS England committed to practices being able to claim back costs incurred during the pandemic, while protecting funds for suspended LES and QOF work. And we also know practices have still had a lot of organisational work to do during this time.

The risk is now way beyond what could have been imagined

So if practices are still being paid and still have high volumes of work, why not use locums as before, for remote consultations or other tasks? This could even allow permanent staff to take time off and avoid potential burnout.

There is a moral aspect. It’s true we chose to locum and take the risk of self-employment. But the risk is now way beyond what could have been imagined.

Partners often talk about locums’ high fees but many work closely with a small number of practices with which they have built up relationships. Yet this seems to have been forgotten now many of us are facing financial ruin. We have supported practices during sickness and emergencies. And we still need to pay GMC, indemnity, BMA and RCGP fees.

But there are practical issues, too.

We will be an essential part of the efforts during the pandemic and its aftermath, especially now patient demand is rising again and staff need a break.

By leaving us to face financial ruin now, would you be surprised by a mass exodus of doctors out of general practice and the UK when you really need us?

Dr Saumya Jha is a locum GP based in north London

NO - This is the reason locums receive high fees

simon hulme

Can you have your cake and eat it? I would say no.

Why should GPs be different than other self-employed people who aren’t given financial favours? Surely part of the reason for the high fees locums charge is job insecurity and the need to save for a rainy day?

When I began my career many peers started off as locums, but few continued with this long term. Recently, the trend for GPs, often early in their career, seems to be to choose long-term locum work.

The NHS Digital GP Workforce Dashboard shows that in March 2020 around 10% of the GP workforce were locums, 58% of whom were under 45. Compared with March 2016, that’s almost an extra 3,000 GPs choosing locum work.

This distortion of the GP workforce over recent years is of concern. Market forces have driven up the demand for locums, leading to escalating fees. This has gone too far. Locums are vital for covering sickness, maternity leave and holidays but practices have been left needing them just to maintain a service. The option to locum is also important for colleagues who may have suffered health or personal problems and may be unable to rejoin the permanent workforce. I feel for them in the current situation.

As we come out of lockdown, things are getting busy and I am sure practices will be relying on locums again soon.

Can you have your cake and eat it? I'd say no

I hope some of those who have taken advantage of the benefits of locum work will see that the stability of a substantive post has its advantages. For those who are struggling for ad-hoc work there is permanent work available – practices have struggled for years to replace GPs who leave and there will be opportunities.

If locums continued to be given work even when it is not in the best interests of practices, this will distort the market further and market forces have to work both ways. We are already seeing a rebalancing; practices have applicants for unfilled roles. We’ve had no difficulty recruiting within weeks of advertising.

Is this part of the post-coronavirus ‘New Normal’? If so, then it gives me confidence about the stability and future of general practice.

Dr Simon Hulme is a GP partner in West Yorkshire

Rate this article  (3.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (63)

  • Locuming should be seen as a career option for the very few. Your patients don't want a locum and neither do most practices. Having refused to join the effort in keeping general practice going, keeping practices running so that the cartel can charge ridiculous fees for the simplest of jobs. If you turn your back on the core ethos of general practice and decide to milk it as a locum, you are not allowed to claim foul when the jobs dry up. Sadly , general practice will come running back soon, so you can charge an extra 10% to pay for your next 4 week holiday. In the mean time, we will be advertising for 2 new partners to keep our patients supplied with the service that they have known for decades. Applications welcome.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What utter rubbish. Locums are valued GP colleagues are an essential part of the workforce who should be supported and mobilised during this crisis. It’s no wonder that locums don’t want permanent jobs if their viewed by partners as some sort of parasite..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why some superior GPs go onto leadership high earning practices. Some people are made to realise you are here for certain job roles. Then comes the job satisfaction,commitment, exploitation and personal choices etc.
    Govt should make policies for every one on salaried roles.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All of a sudden you want employment benefits but don’t want to be an employee?
    Maybe you’d like to take some partnership drawings as well even though you’re not a partner? It’s only fair in these troubled times, right?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Locums are valued colleagues, but are by their very definition basing their business on ad-hoc work.

    Why on earth would locums expect to be booked for work when practices don't have any work for them?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a strange debate. There are risks in being a partner and risks in being a locum.
    Whichever yo are you have to own those risks.
    A partnership has a duty to support their patients as best possible, whether that involves locums or not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It’s interesting to see the empathy come across from our partner colleagues. If this is a reflection of the empathy some embody, I shudder to think of how some patients might be treated!
    Locums have not “milked” any system. The rise in locums has been due to unfair contracts in salaried roles and some partnership roles. Maybe focus on making these positions more attractive and fair!

    Also, if there was truly a reduction in work, then why oh why have partner pay scales remained the same?

    Some may feel that there has been a milking by some during the pandemic?

    NHS is not for profit, so if your lump sum is the same, usual work suspended.. but still paid for but you need less staff... someone is making a profit?!?

    As general practice did not become super efficient overnight 🤔

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Practices have been through challenging times for years with no let up. Locums have largely been insulated and have done well relatively speaking over the last decade from the challenging position practices have found themselves in. I appreciate that this is a generalisation.
    However, I don't think practices really 'owe it' to locums to suddenly look after their financial welfare. After all locums choose the freedom of being freelance precisely to de-couple themselves from the stresses and challenges of a practices.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Let the locums eat cake?
    You may lose your head

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say