This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Tomorrow’s IT for today’s GPs – building a future-ready system

Nic Fox

nic fox

 

We’re all often quick to point out the shortcomings in technology at the fingertips of GPs. Challenges with systems that don’t properly connect with one another; slow WiFi (not just an NHS problem, of course); data locked away and difficult to access. This is all true – but we must be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

What baby? For starters, every GP practice in our country has its clinical records in a digital system. We are the only major economy in the world to achieve this. GP systems are all connected to a wide range of national systems and services, such as the Electronic Prescription Service, Electronic Referral Service, Spine, NHSmail and Summary Care Record. This shows that interoperability – that vogue phrase of the day – can be achieved.

Systems are resilient and secure, and they are clinically and technically accredited for use in the NHS.

But while I urge us all to celebrate the strengths of our system and its technological achievements to date, be in no doubt of the clarity of feedback we have had from users and stakeholders that there are critical challenges and improvements to be achieved, and a determination to get this right.

The great advantage of the NHS being a planned system is that we are now getting the building blocks in place to set about a concerted, coherent strategy that will bring about significant benefits.

The NHS long-term plan and the new five-year contract for general practice enable us to be much more confident and certain in mapping out the path ahead.

Primary care networks will be a key component, providing greater ability for clinicians to become involved in pathway design with commissioners and, crucially, the greater joining up of services across organisational boundaries.

For us, the long-term plan and GP contract show clearly how the components of digital primary care will be woven together.

It means significant change in a short amount of time, but this approach is the right one for GPs, patients and the NHS as a whole

For example, by next month, at least 25% of appointments will need to be made available to book online, via the NHS App or other online GP services. A difficult step for some, especially when the supply versus demand challenge is significant, but one where practices that are already embracing the potential for using online appointments are yielding benefits.

At the end of 2019, GP IT Futures will replace GP Systems of Choice, the framework from which organisations buy GP IT systems and solutions. This will be about getting the basics right, as the RCGP rightly called for when they unveiled their tech manifesto earlier this year. It will be more than that too. It will open up a new way of working, with interoperable systems, integrated data and new capabilities on offer.

In introducing this framework, there are a number of important changes we are making for the benefit of patients, general practice and primary care teams.

Firstly, safe and secure access to patient data held in general practice systems has always, and continues to be, essential. It is true for patients accessing their own data through the NHS App or other systems, for better communications between general practice and other health and care organisations, and for the benefits that can be made to the research agenda.

We are already making progress – for example the introduction of SNOMED CT Clinical terminology across general practice to standardise clinical coding, or GP Connect which is providing modern interfaces to GP systems for sharing of appointment and clinical information.

But we must go further and faster. The new arrangements will place stronger technology, data and commercial requirements on suppliers to achieve this.

Secondly, an expanded set of business capabilities that the NHS can safely and easily buy. We’ve worked closely with the GP profession and in conjunction with the development of the Long Term Plan and the new arrangements will have a significant increase in the number of functions that are available, such as social prescribing.

Thirdly, we have worked closely with the market – with existing system suppliers and with potential new suppliers to the market. We’ve been extremely transparent about the requirements – we are seeking to be ambitious, but we are giving capable suppliers every chance to be successful and we want to build strong partnership arrangements with industry to deliver these essential capabilities.

And fourthly, we want better choice and buying arrangements for practices, primary care networks and CCGs. We want a dynamic and vibrant market of suppliers and solutions that are available to general practice. We will put in place a Digital Buying Catalogue that will allow the NHS to easily compare and purchase assured solutions. Not a one-size-fits-all approach, but one that empowers commissioners to buy the IT services you need, based on modern, standards-based, open architectures.

It is an ambitious project, meaning significant change in a short amount of time, but this standards-based approach is absolutely the right one. It’s right for you as a GP, right for patients and right for the NHS as a whole.

Nic Fox is director of primary care technology at NHS Digital

Rate this article  (1.33 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (14)

  • NHS IT a litany ot success the way our clinical system is currently working(more not)the above is ambitious but I can see it happening.Ive been doing this too long an am getting very very cynical.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is a cheerleading certificate a requirement for applicants for these posts?

    How do the pom poms not interfere with wifi access?

    It's true that a lot has been achieved, and we do need to remember that, but 'this plan is the only plan, and there is no other plan' suggests that 1984 wasn't high on the reading list.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The problem is Government planning in any IT area. Stop it. Have they not learnt anything from the CfH debacle which set our IT systems into aspic? At one time GPs could chose, and their main driver would have been ergonomics and patient safety. We lost 15 years of innovation and lost innovative IT companies because of Connecting for Health.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • please-delete-this-fucking-profile-i-cant-delete-it-in-my-account-settings

    driven primarily by the needs of administrators and central government. as an end user of a GP data input system for the last 15 years i can honestly say the 'improvements' introduced over my time as a GP have resulted in a system which is significantly slower to use, more prone to random server related 'freezes' and 'crashes' with very little improvement in end user real world usability. EMIS LV was rock solid, rarely crashed and you could input a consultation summary in seconds. on EMIS web the same process is slow, with server lag highly dependant of the quality of the local internet connection and prone to freezing. Imputing a consultation that previously took seconds now takes minutes- that isn't progress , it's a pain in the arse. they went to the moon with the computing power less than the average washing machine. complexity does not automatically lead to improvement, more often in IT it leads to greater fragility, but it certainly gets the IT administrators excited and gives politicians opportunities for tightening central control - Stalin would defiantly have been a fan

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Nic Fox is not a doctor. Typical a 'Gung Ho' IT professional who graciously admits to problems but minimises them, blinded as he is by the IT bright lights in the distance.

    In 1986 I started with the CGPMP programme on the Amstrad 1512 with a 20mb hard drive. I too was blinded by the IT light. Here we are 33 years later and the GP system is better but not by much.

    Now very much an IT cynic and don't get me started on the BILLIONS politicans have p1ssed up the wall on IT projects of all sorts that have failed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When the IT system is down, doctors are happy and guess what, the patients too. Finally some eye contact rather than screen or keyboard contact and actually dealing with the patient's rather than the government or QoF's agenda however "trivial".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gp IT was a world leader 25 years ago it true, but sadly those days are long gone. We are still using faxes for referrals, scanning paper letters and using paper prescriptions. In Denmark for example none of these 3 exist at all.
    And our systems are soooo sloowww as we watch little circles go round and round due to the governments insistence on remote servers without the good broadband needed to make them work well. And gp medical records are poor in the uk especially systemone.
    Above all please improve the hardware and the connections before imposing more IT ‘improvements’

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So that is the ‘choice’ that has happened in wales where half of practices were forced to change from emis to microtest . Yes microtest😱

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I love the 'its right for me' approach.... has anyone actually asked me? This guy should stick to an american shopping channel.... I dont think he knows his 'target audience' very well......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • |Gerard Bulger | GP Partner/Principal|19 Jun 2019 10:36am
    The problem is Government planning in any IT area

    That doesn't go far enough. The problem is government planning full stop....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say