This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GPs to be provided with occupational health support, after NHS England bows to demands

Exclusive All GPs will be provided with ‘high quality’ occupational health support if they need it, says NHS England in a significant victory for Pulse’s ‘Battling Burnout’ campaign highlighting the dangerous levels of stress and mental exhaustion in the profession.

The announcement came in NHS England’s official response to a letter sent by Pulse earlier this year - co-signed by 100 GPs - urging it to reconsider its ‘bafflingly short-sighted’ move to restrict occupational health support only to GPs when they had performance concerns raised.

It came hours before the LMCs Conference in York was about to debate a motion calling for the conference to ‘deplore the decision to no longer fund an occupational health service for GP practices, unless there is a performance issue’.

In the letter NHS England chair Professor Malcolm Grant recognised Pulse’s campaign and said the NHS could not afford to lose good GPs and that it would ‘play its part’ in ‘helping the profession deliver for patients’.

The GPC praised the ‘breakthrough’ and said that Pulse’s campaign had helped put more pressure on NHS England in negotiations.

An NHS England spokesperson told Pulse that it had taken a ‘step back’ from a previous announcement from NHS England in January that it intended to replace the current postcode lottery of occupational health provision - formerly provided by PCTs - with funding only for GPs ‘where there are concerns about performance’.

He said that NHS England had decided to procure a ‘high quality’ occupational health services that all GPs in England could access. Salaried GPs would also be covered by the service, but he said that practices would have to pay if any members of their staff - such as practice nurses or managers - used the service as employers.

Pulse’s Battling Burnout campaign ran the largest ever survey of GP burnout that showed over 40% of the profession at risk and publicised the issue in the national press. We also urged GPs to write to their local MP and sent NHS England chair Professor Grant a letter earlier this year deploring the body’s decision not to fund comprehensive support for stressed and burntout GPs, cosigned by the BMA, RCGP and over 100 individual GPs.

In his response to the letter, Professor Grant told Pulse: ‘GPs are the cornerstone of the NHS, providing an essential service in all our communities. It’s a hugely valued and important role but the demands can be intense. The role is set to become even more crucial because we need GPs to lead the transformation of primary care that we all want to see.

‘So we need good people to join the profession and to stay in the profession - we can’t lose them to burn out. I welcome Pulse’s work to improve the welfare of GPs. NHS England needs to listen with great care to what GPs are saying. We will play our part in helping the profession deliver for patients.’

Head of primary care development at NHS England, Dr David Geddes, a GP in York, explained that now it would fund an occupational health service that all GPs on the performers list across England could access - similar to the service offered to GPs in Wales.

He told Pulse: ‘We have taken a step back, thinking we need equity between the professions, and we need to ensure that what we do have is affordable. We will prioritise those that are on the national performers list: doctors, and dentists and optometrists, but not practice staff, not nurses. Not when they are employed by the practice.’

He added that the decision was made due to concerns over patient safety, although he denied that the change was a reversal of previous policy.

He said: ‘[Occupational health] is about making sure the doctor is safe to do their job, but also the job is safe for the doctor to do, that is a very important part of it. So it means that you don’t need to be burnt out to see our occupational health.’

Dr Geddes said that NHS England would now establish a procurement framework, ‘within the next four months or so’ that area teams will use to commission services that meet the national criteria.

He said: ‘As area teams’ contracts start to come up to expire we will offer that procurement framework so there will be a whole range of different providers who will all, if you like, meet the criteria of the service that we need to commission.’

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said that the announcement was a ‘step forward’ for GPs. He said: ‘We are pleased that NHS England has understood that it is crucial that GPs, as well as all other staff in the NHS, should have access to occupational health services. That is a breakthrough. It is important they have recognised the need to resource this.’

He added: ‘We are still in dialogue, so we have not finalised any agreements. We’re still concerned that practice staff do not appear to be part of the poroposed scheme, and we think it is fundamental that practice staff and nurses…should be given the same treatment as other staff in the NHS.

‘We’re pleased after the pressure we have put on NHS England, they have come back to us with proposals. That is a step forward. We are certainly in a better place than we were last year.

‘It is really important that publicity through the Pulse burnout survey, as well as opinions expressed by GPs, is vitally important so that politicians realise it is not just GPC leaders saying this.’

Related images

  • Battling Burnout Logo

Readers' comments (15)

  • At last some recognition that their policies are starting to kill us off .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting comments about "equity" - when won't be providing anything for practice staff.
    Is staff occupational health part of service provision (so part funding) in a. NHS bodies and b. non-NHS health service provider contracts?
    Do NHS England staff have decent occupational health services?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "high quality" what like the high quality Mental Health Services they provide!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's good that these have been reinstated but they should never have been stopped to begin with. This would have only saved a trivial amount of money but has generated a huge amount of bad will.

    NHS England should be ashamed of themselves, but I think they don't understand the concept of shame.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Talk about shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • DAILY MAIL WILL READ "GREEDY, LAZY, BENTLEY DRIVING, MANSION-OWNING GPs TOO LAZY TO WORK 18 HOUR DAYS"
    OR "GLOBAL WARMING ALL THE FAULT OF GPs".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Awful mess where so many are burning out by the day better be good if we are to save the service

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well done, I'm sure GPC would be parading this as a great victory for general practice.

    It's like your house is burning down and the fire fighters saves the shed and hailing it as a great success. Sorry to burst your bubble guys but if you actually bothered to stop the root cause of us burning out, there would be minimum need for an occi health service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Too late; I've gone!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    (1) I still think this is well done campaign although I realise there are some arguments which criticised Pulse and GPC wasted no time to take credit for this 'victory' and GPC did nothing to stop GPs from burning out.
    (2) The truth is unnecessary increase in demand and hence workload has been the unique reason for GP burning out(money only comes second to this because one can be paid same or even less by reducing workload by 30%) .
    (3) Bottom line is the only criminal is the government and those who are playing politics with the agenda of withdrawing more funding into the service . (Includes secondary care). All these inappropriate workload together with a public 'falsely' educated was down to the lack of commitment and ignorance of politicians and bureaucrats. We can influence them but we are never the one to press the button especially if they are already pre-occupied with another agenda. As I said before , this is a government of the GDP, by the GDP and for the GDP .
    (4) I support protesting against the government BUT one has to be clear on what one is fighting and protesting for in the day. What is the flag one is flying on the battlefield ? Is it a flag of NHS or a flag of 'no NHS'? Think carefully about the 'meaning of this war'. The typical joke was all these youngsters joining a mass of protest on the street and were asked, 'do you know what we are protesting today?' . The answer from the youngsters were,' we just protest , protest and protest!'
    (5) Yes. The current situation of NHS is unsustainable but any 'remedy' suggested(e.g. charging a fee) should be still about making the NHS sustainable again , NOT creating a portal for any politician from ANY party to finish off NHS once and for all.
    (6) I will say it again, we are in an extraordinary time of the history of general practice in this country. In front of us is a crossroad , left, right or the middle. The final decision has to be a democratic one no mater what tactics one uses to generate a 'decision'. Right or wrong , perhaps only history and our future generations can be the judge...........

    There will always be those
    who mean to do us harm
    To stop them , we risk awakening the same evil within ourselves
    Kirk Star Trek into Darkness 2013

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say