Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Government drops plans for doctors to have legal duty of candour to report poor care

The Government has dropped plans to impose a statutory duty of candour that would have legally obliged GPs to report treatment or care that they believed had caused death or serious injury.

In his response to the Francis Report on failures of care at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, health secretary Jeremy Hunt today said doctors would have a professional duty to report any failures of care or ‘near misses’ they come across, but this would be not be a legal obligation, despite this being a recommendation by Robert Francis.

But the Department of Health did state it would aim to introduce a criminal sanction for ‘wilful neglect’ by medical staff, which it said was ‘designed for those guilty of the most extreme types of poor care’.

The BMA has welcomed the Government’s decision to shelve the plans for a statutory duty of candour but warned that the new criminal sanction will not have the desired effects.

The health secretary’s response to the Francis Report said that existing professional guidance and codes would be reviewed to ‘strengthen’ the professional duty of candour, a process that will be carried out by the GMC and will be monitored by the Professional Standards Authority

The Government said: ‘The professional values of individual clinicians are critical in ensuring an open culture in which mistakes are reported, whether or not they cause actual harm.’

‘The General Medical Council, the Nursing and Midwifery Council and the other professional regulators will be working to agree consistent approaches to candour and reporting of errors, including a common responsibility across doctors and nurses, and other health professions to be candid with patients when mistakes occur whether serious or not, and clear guidance that professionals who seek to obstruct others in raising concerns or being candid would be in breach of their professional responsibilities.’

It added: ‘The professional regulators will develop new guidance to make it clear professionals’ responsibility to report “near misses” for errors that could have led to death or serious injury, as well as actual harm, at the earliest available opportunity and will review their professional codes of conduct to bring them into line with this guidance.’

‘The professional regulators will also review their guidance to panels taking decisions on professional misconduct to ensure they take proper account of whether or not professionals have raised concerns promptly.’

The BMA welcomed the Government’s announcement. Dr Mark Porter, chair of BMA Council, said: ‘We are… pleased that the Government has heeded the BMA’s warnings over the introduction of a statutory duty of candour for individuals, instead strengthening the professional duty that already exists. It is vital that organisations actively listen to their staff and take on their concerns.’

However, he added: ‘While extending wilful neglect as a criminal offence may go some way towards reassuring the public, it is unlikely to bring around the change in culture we need, and how this will work in practice is something that we will continue to discuss with the Government as there are already criminal sanctions in place in order to hold healthcare workers, including doctors, to account.’

Niall Dickson, chief executive of the GMC, said: ‘Through our guidance, we have already done a great deal to encourage a duty of candour among doctors, but we are not complacent. We know there is more to do. We must strengthen the link between our guidance and doctors’ practice on the frontline, the words on the page and actions on the ward. We look forward to working with doctors and others to make that happen.’

The Government also put forward plans to pilot ‘Schwartz rounds’ in GP practices.

The initiative, developed in the US but promoted in the UK by the King’s Fund through its ‘Point of Care’ programme, are described by the think-tank as: ‘A forum for clinical and non-clinical staff from all backgrounds and levels of an organisation to come together once a month, for one hour, eat lunch or breakfast together, and explore the impact that their job has on their feelings and emotions.’

The Department of Health’s response today said: ‘Supporting staff wellbeing means recognising the impact of the work that they do. The pioneering work on Schwartz rounds is one example of how staff can be supported to deal with the realities of care for staff. The Government has already signalled its support for this work…. For the first time ever, they will also be piloted with GP practices, district nurses and in the community.’

Readers' comments (7)

  • I am sure most of us could report an "incident" weekly at least.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can we also report when government policy endangers patients?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If you genuinely believe that DoH via NHSE is endangering patients, then yes you can.
    GPs are covered by the Public Interest Disclosure Act as if they were employees of NHSE.
    FOI response asking about whistleblower policy....

    "Our Corporate Governance Team have advised me that our policy adheres to the requirements of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 and that GPs are covered by this. The protection available to GPs is outlined in the Act and in our policy which was attached to our previous response.

    If you have any further questions, it may be useful to note that the current whistleblowing policy was developed by the Policy Directorate of NHS England and is overseen by the Director of Corporate Development whose details are publically available via the recently published NHS England organogram (http://data.gov.uk/organogram/nhs-england)

    Yours Sincerely,"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • By slashing the funding for the nation's healthcare isn't the government guilty of "wilful neglect"?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In my experience, candour is simply a word that is difficult to spell for the NHS. As Jeremy Hunt said 'a deep-rooted culture change is required. As to making the NHS more transparent - good luck, can't see it happening.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "By slashing the funding for the nation's healthcare isn't the government guilty of "wilful neglect"?"

    Yes, yes and yes. It is also guilty of wilful neglect of staff health. I do not know how they are managing to provide a service at all in this blame and bully culture. They have decimated the NHS and any mistakes made, which will happen because people under severe prolonged stress are much more likely to make mistakes as well as become ill, are the responsibility of this government. They have consulted no person on this madcap mishmash of a drive to sell off the NHS and 'reorganise' it. have spent billions with no coherent plan and certainly no backing from any research on best practise for patient care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wormwood Scrubs, here we come. We could probably do some health promotion in there. Surely some spin doctor could turn that into a positive Daily Mail headline before the next election.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say