This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

RCGP trialling extended role accreditation to replace GPSI

The RCGP is currently trialling a new GPs-with-extended-roles accreditation, which will replace the special interest certification and require GPs to undergo an annual appraisal.

An accreditation framework has been developed by the college, in collaboration with NHS England, to outline the routes to accreditation, the standards that are expected and how the appraisals will work.

According to the RCGP, a consistent process for accreditation and re-accreditation has been lacking 'since the dissolution of Primary Care Trusts in 2013'.

The report has defined extended practice as any activity that is 'beyond the scope of GP training and the MRCGP exam' and cannot be undertaken without further training.

It added that this qualification should ‘help to address areas of significant patient need’.

The extended roles accreditation involves an annual scope of practice appraisal, replacing the three-year re-accreditation seen in the previous scheme.

This will require GPs to provide evidence that they are maintaining their requisite knowledge and competencies, and that their skills are up to date.

An annual appraisal portfolio must also be provided which will include evidence related to CPD, patient and colleague feedback, as well as complaints and compliments.

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said: 'The college, with support from NHS England, has developed a new framework to support the accreditation of GPs with Extended Roles, previously referred to as GPs with Special Interests.

'This framework explains that the appraisal and revalidation processes provide a mechanism for GPwERs to demonstrate continued competence in their extended role – something that has not been explicit previously'.

Although the RCGP has said it will not accredit all extended roles, it confirmed its intention to work with other ‘reputable organisations’ to set appropriate standards.

The college is currently trialling an extended role in dermatology and skin surgery, but aims to 'phase in accreditation' in priority areas following the results of this test run.

Definition of a GP with an extended role (GPwER)

A GPwER is a GP who undertakes, in addition to their core general practice, a role that is beyond the scope of GP training and the MRCGP, and requires further training.

The extended role is typically undertaken within a contract or setting that distinguishes it from standard general practice and/or it is an activity offered for a fee outside of care to the registered practice population (teaching, training, research, occupational medicals, medico-legal reports, cosmetic procedures, etc).

Source: RCGP

Readers' comments (7)

  • Arent we all GPs with extended roles these days? - Oh but not outisde our practices...so it's ok to be a geriatrician or cardiologist or manage anticoagulation without accreditation in Gp but not out of GP...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • More bureaucracy, more regulation, just what we need to ensure things go from bad to worse in GP.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • RCGP is bad news. Just a look at what has happened with MRCGP is enough to predict how this will end up. If you are GPwSI, this is time to start thinking if this is worth it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is money in being the official regulator and yet more stress for those being regulated

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We do not need any more specialists. The RCGP is trying to create more brands to generate income. Patients value more generalists giving holistic care.A GP is a GP.We would stay in hospitals if we wanted to be specialists with proper resources.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • UtterFool

    More appraisal, more regulation. There are too many bodies looking to set things up in order to justify their existence. We are being regulated out of existence. So if you’re a GPwER you will have to do TWO appraisals every year?? Or collect TWICE as much evidence? Why add yet another level of bureaucracy? The only effect this will have is to reduce the numbers of GPs with special interest / extended role accreditation. And all to feed the ego of the RCGP. To all self important administrators out there...shut up already!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just a power grab by Biscuit Barrel and her toady ilk.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say