Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP golden hello pilots fail to attract enough candidates

A pilot scheme paying GPs £20,000 to join local practices has ’not had the desired effect’ after running for six months, with the CCG considering withdrawing the scheme.

The £250,000 scheme, run by NHS Leicester City CCG with funding from NHS England, offered GPs up to £20,000 to join practices, but only three out of 16 practices have been able to find new GPs.

A report to the CCG’s primary care strategy group revealed that eight practices have failed to recruit through the scheme, while the remaining five ‘decided to recruit jointly’ with the CCG co-ordinating the process.

One unsuccessful practice has pulled out of the scheme altogether.

This comes amid efforts by NHS England to implement a nationwide ‘golden hello’ scheme to tackle the current recruitment crisis.

When suggesting the pilot scheme last year, Leicester City Council’s health and wellbeing board had aimed to recruit 12 new GPs to the city, but the CCG report said that it ‘seems the approach to recruitment to date has not yet yielded the increase [in] numbers of GPs expected’.

It said the board was ‘recommended to consider whether the scheme should be paused [while] expert advice is sought on how to undertake an effective recruitment process’.

The report to the strategy group meeting, held last week (5 May), said: ‘Clearly the scheme to date has not had the desired effect, eight practices despite trying have failed to recruit with only three practices being successful.’

‘The options available at the moment are to continue with the joint advert to see if this approach does have a fundamental difference. Or alternatively pause the scheme and utilise some of the funding to bring some expertise in to determine whether there is a different approach that could be taken to recruitment.’

But according to local newspaper the Leicester Mercury, which reported on the meeting, CCG leaders said they ‘could not just drop’ the recruitment scheme, especially in light of the Government’s plans for seven-day opening.

It decided that the advertising of the scheme should continue but advice be sought on how to better market the roles.

Despite the overall negative outcome, four GPs were recruited with the help of the scheme, filling positions that had been vacant for two years. The GPs were offered £10,000 each for two years, £20,000 in total, provided they did not leave the job.

NHS England agreed to fund the pilot after NHS Leicester City CCG highlighted urgent GP shortages and an expected hike in retirement rates over the next ten years as 60 of Leicester’s 121 GPs partners were over 50 at the time.

NHS England announced a £10 million, 10-point plan for solving the GP workforce crisis in January this year, which included plans to offer golden handshakes.

But primary care commissioning lead Dr David Geddes commented just one month later that golden hello schemes ‘don’t work’, leading only to bidding wars between different areas with GP recruitment problems.

The Conservative Party has promised to increase the number of GPs by 5,000 by the end of this Parliament in 2020.

Birmingham LMC executive secretary Dr Robert Morley said the Leicester pilot was ‘further evidence of how bad the GP workforce crisis really is’.

In response, he urged the new Government to ‘overhaul current contractual mechanisms’ and offer ‘new additional and recurrent money from the Treasury’.

He said: ‘This demonstrates the obvious - that one-off, short term sticking plaster solutions cannot possibly rescue general practice from the current disastrous and destructive recruitment and retention crises. It is also , and the government must pull its head out of the sand and acknowledge this. What we needed is significant, recurrent, sustained investment in both core contractual funding and in mechanisms to incentivise long-term developments in the general practice workforce.

‘Without this a safe basic GP service is soon going to become wholly untenable, let alone the government’s pie in the sky promises over seven-day working, same day routine access and all the rest of the undeliverable pre-election promises.’

 

Pulse GP Jobs

Readers' comments (48)

  • Pay them (a lot more) and they will come.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The market speaks,as above,remember a lot of young GPs now have student loans to clear.?A bounty enough to clear these then you would be talking.A golden hellow does not sugar the bitter pill of General Practice as it currently is or at this level esecially after tax etc.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is anyone actually surprised?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • no surprise ---- what about a golden retention

    oh they are getting rid of that as well

    55 and going going gone

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This basically shows how pathetic the state of the surgeries in Leicester are, and also says a lot about the GP Partners who are currently running these surgeries. The sooner they introduce an all-Salaried GP model of service the better as it is not good to leave the future of General Practice in the hands of people who cannot run surgeries effectively.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Have just retired ( at 66) and would be happy to help out occasionally - but despite being revalidated for 5 years last year I have to undergo annual appraisal in order to stay on the list. Life is now too short to jump through that hoop but my experience is now permanently lost - more flexibility is needed ? lengthen the appraisal requirements to 2 years?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @10:16 ; Absolutely agree:
    To start with, it may make sense to pay off the student loan the young doctor has and that may be an incentive. A one off £20k minus 40% tax doesn't leave much for the incumbent. Even if the tax has to be paid on the loan pay off by employer would be a lot higher, it would be acceptable to the new recruits as it means getting rid of a massive burden right at career start
    It is a different matter that there is no trust that things will improve in GP land - how do we change that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just proves its not just about money. Work life balance needs to be improved and constant talk about 7 day week service is just silly given the current situation

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctors are not bloody stupid....here's 20K to ruin the rest of your life.....is that the value of their life and professional career.....20 grand..........**** *** Hunt and your stupid friend THE DAILY NUTTER.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The issue is the lack of understanding by politicians about the role of a GP. They are told we are the cheapest way to treat patients because of the block contract and we just absorb more unpaid work and are bullied and belittled by the press to be more available. Until we can speak with one voice about what we are willing to do and not be divided by self-interest every quick fix popularist solution will be thrown our way.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.