This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

A faulty production line

GP numbers have decreased in first year of NHS rescue package

The number of full-time-equivalent GPs has decreased in the first year since NHS England released its rescue package designed to alleviate the GP recruitment crisis, official figures have revealed today. 

The provisional figures, released by NHS Digital, show that there has been an increase of 36 in FTE GP numbers excluding locums in the first three months of 2017, as the reporting of locum figures has changed in the meantime. 

However, the figures also reveal that the number of FTE GPs has fallen by 542 since NHS England released its GP Forward View in April last year, designed to meet health secretary Jeremy Hunt’s target of 5,000 extra FTE GPs by 2020.

It also means that numbers have actually decreased since the target was set in September 2015 - meaning the Government now has to recruit 5,220 FTE GPs to meet its target.

GP leaders said that the figures ’demonstrate the failure of politicians’ to give support to GPs.

These are the first figures a year on from the release of the GP Forward View. The plans developed by NHS England involved an uplift in total GP funding of £2.4bn a year by 2020, and a separate package of £500m to implement immediate measures to support general practice.

This included measures to incentivise GPs to move to the areas hardest hit by the recruitment crisis, to incentivise GPs to stay in practice if they were considering leaving, and to smooth the process to re-enter UK general practice.

But the latest figures suggest that these measures have so far failed.

The total number of FTE GPs decreased from 34,914 in March 2016 to 34,372 in March 2017.

This comes after Pulse revealed that the number of GP vacancies has increased in the past year, with 12% of all positions now vacant, and one in five practices giving up the search for a new GP.

Dr Krishna Kasaraneni, BMA GP Education, Training and Workforce lead, said: ’These figures demonstrate the failure of politicians to uphold their pledges to deliver the GPs necessary to provide the number of appointments and sustainable service that patients deserve. The overall number of GPs working in England has dropped since 2015, which leaves the NHS a considerable distance short of the current targets for the GP workforce. There is little prospect of the promised 5,000 additional GPs materialising anytime soon.

’This continued workforce crisis has left many GP practices unable to properly staff their surgeries at a time when local services are struggling to cope with rising patient demand and flatlining budgets. A recent BMA survey showed that a third of GP practices had vacancies left unfilled for a year.

’The next government must ensure that we have a properly staffed service that can meet the needs of patients.’

 RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said: 'Of course any rise in GP numbers is encouraging, and we are seeing a small rise since the last figures in December – but we are still way off GP Forward View target, and indeed since September last year these figures show a drop of 381 GPs, which is a serious concern...

'Workload in general practice is soaring – 16% over the last seven years according to the latest research -  yet our workforce has not risen in step, and is now actually reducing. This isn’t acceptable.'

How GP numbers have decreased in past 12 months

 September 2015March 2016September 2016December 2016 (provisional)March 2017 (provisional)
Full-time-equivalent GPs 34,592 34,914 34,495 34,050 34,372
GP providers 19,995 19,034 21,163 20,835 20,702
Salaried/other GPs 6,826 6,687 7,292 7,300 7,390
GP registrars 4,719 4,909 5,273 5,183 5,250
GP retainers 64 68 72 69 81
GP locums 537 601 692 663 949

Source: NHS Digital

Readers' comments (18)

  • "The figures, released by NHS Digital, show that there has been a 300 increase in FTE GP numbers in the first three months of 2017, while the total number of GPs in England increased by 725 between December and March"
    And that will be the section HMG concentrates on reporting

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What are they smoking? Can we all have a round too:)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • National Hopeless Service

    So they include naughty, bad & NHS destroying locums in their lovely nice figures....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hacker: The National Health Service, Humphrey, is an advanced case of galloping bureaucracy!
    Sir Humphrey: Oh, certainly not galloping. A gentle canter at the most.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Didn't pulse publish a report on how NHS digital were calculating the figures - any chance of uploading the link again?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Couple of issues with the numbers. Secondly I do believe that there will be a big rise in the number of FTE GPs retiring or reducing their hours since 1st April.
    Either way we all know that the FTE GP numbers are going to reduce until General Practice is less toxic etc etc etc
    I retired this quarter in mid 50s. My niece is giving up being a GP in her 30s.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 11:11 - Not sure it really matters:-

    Sir Humphrey: If local authorities don't send us statistics, Government figures will be a nonsense.
    Hacker: Why?
    Sir Humphrey: They'll be incomplete.
    Hacker: Government figures are a nonsense, anyway.
    Bernard: I think Sir Humphrey wants to ensure they're a complete nonsense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As clear as mud.
    But let's accept that there has been a decrease in the number of FTE GPs. Could NHS Digital please help us to track down our missing colleagues, starting with:
    How many are sitting comfortably at CCG governing body tables?
    How many "represent" us at LMCs?
    How many have become medical directors for Health Education England?
    How many have joined DH & NHSE and their "agencies"?
    How many choose to give pointless advice to patients (if you eat less) from Public Health England and H&W Boards platforms?

    For more on "missing GPs' read the Peverley classic:

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 11:44
    You forgot CQC, GP Appraisers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Invest more in General practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say