Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Police should have greater access to medical records, says chief constable

The police should be given extended legal powers to access GP records for the purpose of protecting the vulnerable, and obtaining medical information outside the hours where it is possible to get a court order, a leading police officer has said.

Sir Peter Fahy, chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, said in an interview with the Guardian that vulnerable groups - increasingly comprised of the elderly and dementia sufferers - now account for 70% of police work.

He added that record access would allow police to track next of kin, and medical information for when dealing with someone with Alzheimer’s, or check for pertinent information on a patient’s drugs or alcohol history before responding to a call.

But the BMA has rejected the plans to extend police powers, saying that difficulties for the police were not sufficient to go against the fundamental rule of patient confidentiality.

The Guardian reports that Sir Peter even suggested doctors should be compelled to share the records of victims of domestic abuse, even where the patient has opposed reporting their situation.

Public concern about any extension of powers for police access to their medical records is likely to be heightened by the public attention drawn to NHS England’s flagship record sharing scheme, care.data.

The scheme was delayed in February as a result of a failed public awareness campaign – which reached less than a third of households – and widespread concern at the lack of controls on who could receive data.

Care.data would also enable the police a backdoor to records, requesting them from the Health and Social Care Information Centre database rather than having to approach the individual’s GP.

Sir Peter told the Guardian: ‘We could do a better job if we have greater access to information, which it is currently hard for us to get.’

‘It would give us a deeper understanding of those we are expected to help and their problems. The actions we take would be much improved if we had a better understanding of that history at the time we are called.’

On the call for GPs and other medical professionals to share records of those suffering domestic abuse he said: ‘The alternative is the woman continues to suffer … There should be the ability to share the information, against the woman’s wishes, to solve the problem, without a criminal justice system approach.’

‘Society has matured – there is a far greater expectation on public services to safeguard vulnerable people.’

‘Twenty years ago, with domestic abuse, it was seen as one of those things. Now there’s a greater expectation agencies will safeguard the victim whether or not they wish to make a complaint and enter the criminal justice system.’

But the chair of the BMA’s Medical Ethics Committee, Dr Tony Calland, said: ‘The essential principle that runs throughout the recording of medical information is that of confidentiality and trust. This principle has stood the test of time for millennia and still holds good today.’

‘​At present the checks and balances in the current legal position are satisfactory and whilst the current law may cause some difficulty for the police the case has not been made to recommend a substantial change in the law ​.’

Readers' comments (7)

  • hey why not? everyone else seems to have access.

    why not go further and ask the gp to look through the notes and write a report as we don't have anything else to do between playing golf and driving the bentley.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes, because governmental bodies have never been found to access data they are not entitled to access and they have never abused their position. And we know every single policemen are genuine and not a single one has ever been corrupt. So it's perfectly safe to tell my patient their confidential data will be just as safe with police having more access to their record.

    Not

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So the Chief Constable is reported as follows:
    "He added that record access would allow police to track next of kin, and medical information for when dealing with someone with Alzheimer’s, or check for pertinent information on a patient’s drugs or alcohol history before responding to a call."
    Have you ever tried to get information from the Police about a patient you are about to see / visit as to the risk to yourself?
    The Police want all the information they can get yet are very reluctant to share what they already have, even where there may be a significant risk to a health professional.
    Information-sharing is a two-way street, Chief Constable!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ooh those nice fluffy police chiefs just want to understand us better.....well he could now claim to be doing research and apply for access to care data records....shame some have uses the option to opt out now. Let's not forget how useful any data base could be to a state where the police have too much power - medical records have had very useful information in the past which have assisted the state to target vulnerable people --couldn't happen here?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh dear, Sir Peter Fahy has suddenly fallen from grace. Would you entrust your confidential medical history to him? -
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-28755375

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Police will not make criminal records disclosures or give information pertinent to risk assessments of dangerous patients that we see. What about information we might find "helpful" ?

    Criminal risks of assaults, harassment and damage to property by disaffected patients is getting more concerning. Many a time a patient takes issue with an honest factual report we are obliged to write for social services, or their solicitor or the Courts, Benefits afency, DVLA etc.
    I have personal experience of the Police failing to investigate or protect us when we have incidents at the practice. As for threats by patients "it is your word against his that he actually said that or meant to (kill you), (burn the practice down), (go after your family), (smash your car up) " I was told (about one of those !). Thank you Officer...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Would it not be sensible to regulate the Police first. Currently the British Police are unregulated and can do whatever they want. The IPCC is just a police protection agency, unlike the GMC Gestapo.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say